The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I have made some update's too my site, I was wondering if I coulds get some suggestions/comments anything that might benefit my site.
www.developking.tk (btw i'm not advertising nor am I spamming I just want too get a few suggestions on what could make my site better )
thank's
AJ
www.developking.tk (btw i'm not advertising nor am I spamming I just want too get a few suggestions on what could make my site better )
thank's
AJ
Page:
the site is currently down so i linked my .tk address to a friends address.
Erm lol, it redirects to some geocities site made using the page builder now ;)
MJswerve wrote:
> The point made was that its quite ironic to use front page to make a
> html/javascript/css tutorial type site using front page. Surely you
> agree :p
Well, yes, I see where your coming from with that.
Still, it's good to see you did change the design, template or not, it's certainly a lot nicer than what you had before
> The point made was that its quite ironic to use front page to make a
> html/javascript/css tutorial type site using front page. Surely you
> agree :p
Well, yes, I see where your coming from with that.
Still, it's good to see you did change the design, template or not, it's certainly a lot nicer than what you had before
I personally liked the previous one but everyone was hassling me about it saying it wwas crap so i decided to change it!
Don't get me wrong - I think this is a very, very slick design. But it is a heck of a jump from the website Cheeseman posted here a few days ago. If he made it himself, then great. I don't see anything wrong with using a template anyway, but if you *are* using one then it's a bit weird trying to teach people HTML.
cjh wrote:
> But it looks good, so whats wrong with using Frontpage???
>
> Despite what some people think, using FrontPage to make a Web Page
> doesn't automaticly mean it is crap.
>
> I like the design, no matter how you made it, it looks good, well
> done.
The point made was that its quite ironic to use front page to make a html/javascript/css tutorial type site using front page. Surely you agree :p I agree the design is nice but I am surprised at the radical change of quality between this and the old site.
> But it looks good, so whats wrong with using Frontpage???
>
> Despite what some people think, using FrontPage to make a Web Page
> doesn't automaticly mean it is crap.
>
> I like the design, no matter how you made it, it looks good, well
> done.
The point made was that its quite ironic to use front page to make a html/javascript/css tutorial type site using front page. Surely you agree :p I agree the design is nice but I am surprised at the radical change of quality between this and the old site.
i did in fact make my own template just as i did the last one(even though it was crap) but then i just write my tutorials on it by frontpage as i find it easier to place things that just looking at a load of text.
AJ
AJ
But it looks good, so whats wrong with using Frontpage???
Despite what some people think, using FrontPage to make a Web Page doesn't automaticly mean it is crap.
I like the design, no matter how you made it, it looks good, well done.
Despite what some people think, using FrontPage to make a Web Page doesn't automaticly mean it is crap.
I like the design, no matter how you made it, it looks good, well done.
If he did then yes it is lol
Isn't it a bit cheeky using Frontpage to make a website of HTML tutorials?
Page: