The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Had a lecture yesterday about neural nets. Some of you may know what these are, some may not. For those that don't, here's a quick run-down - based on my understanding.
Nueral nets are a network of neurones. Funny that. A neurone has many inputs, and only one output. Each input is weighted, in that input 1 may have a weighting of 10, and input 2 has a weighting of 1. Therefore, input 1 is much more important than input 2. With me so far? Right.
If you have a neurone with 10 inputs, the threshold level may be, say, 50. This means that when the inputs are multiplied by their respective weightings, if the results is over 50, then the output is active. Otherwise the output is not active.
Here's a slightly simpler example:
A neuron has 3 inputs, with different weightings:
Input 1 has a weighting of 11.
Input 2 has a weighting of 6.
Input 3 has a weighting of 5.
The threshold level is 10. So, if input 1 is active, then the output is active as the threshold level is reached. If input 1 is not active, then the threshold level can still be reached if both input 2 AND input 3 are active.
If you're not with me, go back and read it again. It does make sense. Promise :-)
People are trying to write computer programs that can represent complex neural nets, as these nets can learn - essentially true Artificial Intelligence.
So what happens in the future when (and it WILL happen, just maybe a few hundred years from now) we create proper AI. Will they have legal rights? Would it be right to give them dangerous jobs? Only allow them certain thoughts and feelings?
Were is the line drawn between man and machine?
This is a difficult question, when you consider that the average human brain is comprised of around 100 BILLION neurones. But if neurones merely react to their inputs (like a computer program), then we have no control over them. Therefore we have no control over our actions.
Because of this we are not guilty of anything. Nor can we take credit for anything. We are just machines. Effectively.
Thoughts? (if you can call them that...)
Nueral nets are a network of neurones. Funny that. A neurone has many inputs, and only one output. Each input is weighted, in that input 1 may have a weighting of 10, and input 2 has a weighting of 1. Therefore, input 1 is much more important than input 2. With me so far? Right.
If you have a neurone with 10 inputs, the threshold level may be, say, 50. This means that when the inputs are multiplied by their respective weightings, if the results is over 50, then the output is active. Otherwise the output is not active.
Here's a slightly simpler example:
A neuron has 3 inputs, with different weightings:
Input 1 has a weighting of 11.
Input 2 has a weighting of 6.
Input 3 has a weighting of 5.
The threshold level is 10. So, if input 1 is active, then the output is active as the threshold level is reached. If input 1 is not active, then the threshold level can still be reached if both input 2 AND input 3 are active.
If you're not with me, go back and read it again. It does make sense. Promise :-)
People are trying to write computer programs that can represent complex neural nets, as these nets can learn - essentially true Artificial Intelligence.
So what happens in the future when (and it WILL happen, just maybe a few hundred years from now) we create proper AI. Will they have legal rights? Would it be right to give them dangerous jobs? Only allow them certain thoughts and feelings?
Were is the line drawn between man and machine?
This is a difficult question, when you consider that the average human brain is comprised of around 100 BILLION neurones. But if neurones merely react to their inputs (like a computer program), then we have no control over them. Therefore we have no control over our actions.
Because of this we are not guilty of anything. Nor can we take credit for anything. We are just machines. Effectively.
Thoughts? (if you can call them that...)
Page:
So is Aladdin. You just see a blue blob.
Oh yeah, Popeye is a good Robin Williams film.
OK, well take into account an unborn baby. It hasn't had the chance to learn anything yet, but an abortion after 8 weeks (or something like that) now constitutes manslaughter because it is capable of feeling. So is it alive if it doesn't know any better?
VenomByte wrote:
> Christ, that's worse spelling than YH :)
And what is THAT supposed to mean?
:-)
> Christ, that's worse spelling than YH :)
And what is THAT supposed to mean?
:-)
VenomByte wrote:
> Wtahc
Christ, that's worse spelling than YH :)
> Wtahc
Christ, that's worse spelling than YH :)
Wtahc lawnmower man instead. Similar sort of thing, in a way.
Lack of vision people!
How well do you think a film on neural nets would sell? I'm advocating this film (it ain't that bad) on the basis it deals with the moral and social aspects of increased artificial inteliigence.
I could have written loads of stuff about neural nets, if I'd wanted to.
Honest.
How well do you think a film on neural nets would sell? I'm advocating this film (it ain't that bad) on the basis it deals with the moral and social aspects of increased artificial inteliigence.
I could have written loads of stuff about neural nets, if I'd wanted to.
Honest.
Asimov would be most unhappy...
Bicentennial Man. Seen it.
Long, boring and utterly pointless chick-flick.
Long, boring and utterly pointless chick-flick.
*laughs*
I like the way he posted a completely serious topic on neural nets, Artificial Intelligence and complex computerised simulations, and you told him to watch Bicentennial Man.
Every time I hear the word Bicentennial, I want to say it the Ned Flanders way.
Bi-centinii-ri-tintini-in-tenntennial.
I like the way he posted a completely serious topic on neural nets, Artificial Intelligence and complex computerised simulations, and you told him to watch Bicentennial Man.
Every time I hear the word Bicentennial, I want to say it the Ned Flanders way.
Bi-centinii-ri-tintini-in-tenntennial.
Page: