GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"6-Man Elimination Hell In A Cell Match Details"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Sat 23/11/02 at 16:23
Regular
Posts: 787
Okay, Russ kinda reminded me that this needs sorting out, so here we go.

The Qualifiers:

Reaver (Ant)
Scotty Dogg (Figo)
Hawk (AfroJoe)
Grandprix
The Jackal (RM18)
DW/RawIsAndy


The Writers:
Assuming that Cong Man won't have time, the siz writers will be -

Ant
Grandprix
RM18
AfroJoe
Figo
Starlight

ONE writer will NOT have an elimination during their part. If one of the listed don't think they'll have time or don't want to write for any reason, then that's fine, please let me know here.


The Event:

The match WILL take place at SRW Spun Out. ASSUMING that the next Eclipse is posted next Sunday, then SRW Spun Out should begin on the 8TH DECEMBER. This means that Grandprix can only do one Eclipse before the PPV, but that's due to Christmas. Spun Out will last for TWO WEEKS, and the HIAC match is the main event.

Some CAW Wrestlers WILL be in two matches. Reaver (Ant) and Jetster will defend the SRW Tag Team Championships against Rosey and Jamal (Jericho15 and Bazzman), and Hawk (AJ) will challenge STD (Figo) for the HardCAW Championship. These will obviously take place before the HIAC.


The Order:

I will write the first part, probably including one elimination. At the current time, the person who's part will not contain an elimination is Starlight, because I'm not entirely sure he'll be able to write a part anyway. It is also most likely that Grandprix will write the last part, although not totally confirmed at this time. The rest of the order will be sorted out in convos on MSN, so if you lot can let me know what sort of times you know you'll be on MSN then I can work something out.

Any more questions? Ask them here. {:)

Thanks for reading, Ant.
Tue 03/12/02 at 19:08
Regular
"sdomehtongng"
Posts: 23,695
RM18 wrote:
> Say The Jackal is in the last three, or Grandprix is in the final two.
> Now, either we are going to have a situation where mine and
> Grandprix's CAWs are not in the final few so its unbiased, or if they
> are, me and Grandprix are going to have to write the other as the
> winner, for fear of looking biased.

---

Yeah, but that can be the case the other way too.

For example, if Reaver goes out before the last two:
Ant writes - I go out
I write - Grandprix goes out
Grandprix writes - RM18 goes out
RM18 writes - Reaver goes out
So then Starlight'd have to write, not eliminating anyone (if it's done Ant's way), which'd leave Figo to write a bit with his guy in it, meaning that he'd also have to make the other guy win, coming to that biased ruling again.

Say that happened - there would either be a predictable ending or a biased winner.
Tue 03/12/02 at 18:08
Regular
Posts: 5,630
No, it has to be the way me and Afro suggested it - the next part written should always be the last person eliminated, thats' the only way.

Say The Jackal is in the last three, or Grandprix is in the final two. Now, either we are going to have a situation where mine and Grandprix's CAWs are not in the final few so its unbiased, or if they are, me and Grandprix are going to have to write the other as the winner, for fear of looking biased.
Tue 03/12/02 at 16:13
Regular
"sdomehtongng"
Posts: 23,695
Yep, fine by me.
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:38
Regular
"I like cheese"
Posts: 16,918
All right then, I know that some people will argue this but this is just a quick, early order for the writers:

Ant
Starlight
Figo
AfroJoe
RM18
Grandprix


Everyone okay with that? I don't care how you choose winners, just try and do it as unbiasedly as possible.
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:28
Regular
"sdomehtongng"
Posts: 23,695
Personally, I think we should just all be as unbiased as we can be, and organise who writes which part.
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:27
Regular
"sdomehtongng"
Posts: 23,695
Ant wrote:
> I dunno - I'm confused. Someone do this for me.

---

We should get Grandprix and RM18 to organise it.

They're the more organised... I think.

:-D
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:25
Regular
"I like cheese"
Posts: 16,918
Bah, I dunno. We could organise an idea, it's just a questions of fairness...any of the six guys could win the titles...

Can we trust each-other not to be biased towards our own competitors? Maybe promise to do it totally randomly, so even if Grandprix is writing the last and part and the final two are Grandprix and Reaver then it won't matter.

I dunno - I'm confused. Someone do this for me.
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:24
Regular
"Too Orangy For Crow"
Posts: 15,844
There is no problem. I can be completely trusted with the last part. Anyone who knows me will know I can be trusted.
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:20
Regular
"sdomehtongng"
Posts: 23,695
No, thought of it again.

It's late at night though, and I'm very tired, and this'll either be very stupid or there'll be some way around it, but I'll say it anyway.

When you write the first part, you most probably won't eliminate Reaver, which'd mean, he'll either have to win or get to the last 2 anyway, or it won't work correctly.

For example, if Reaver goes out before the last two:
Ant writes - I go out
I write - Grandprix goes out
Grandprix writes - RM18 goes out
RM18 writes - Reaver goes out
So then Starlight'd have to write, not eliminating everyone, which'd leave Figo to write a bit with his guy in it.

Then we'd have just Figo and Starlight left, or you'd have to write again... or something.
Mon 02/12/02 at 22:16
Regular
"sdomehtongng"
Posts: 23,695
Ant wrote:
> Unless RIA makes it all the way to the final pairing, then Starlight's
> part will not have an elimination in it.

---

Okey dokey.

---

> Well...it would help if you named them.

---

Well, actually, I had found something wrong before, but ironically, now you've asked me to tell what it is, I can't find anything wrong.

Gay brain. :-D

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Best Provider
The best provider I know of, never a problem, recommend highly
Paul
Simple, yet effective...
This is perfect, so simple yet effective, couldnt believe that I could build a web site, have alrealdy recommended you to friends. Brilliant.
Con

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.