Viewing Thread:
"Timesplitters; how good?"

I have read many reviews of Timesplitter's and they all say different things about it. The images I have seen look dark and gloomy. People say that it's far to easy to complete, and unlike goldeneye, theres not much objectives in each level. Am I horribly wrong? Somebody set me straight! :P

Also what do you think is better: Perfect Dark (N64) OR Timesplitters?

I think Timesplitters is hard. Its easy to complete the story mode on easy but it does get hard. The challenges are hard and takes practice to do them. I tried story n Medium on the first level got the key and died as the level was a bit bigger and the key was further into the level. I reckon that its a tough game depends if you can get use to the controls. I think i have got the hang of it as Iam fine with them. It might be better with the mouse and keyboard if they were supported it depends on if you have used PC first person shooters. I think that iam an experienced gamer and I think that its hard but with practice you'll be able to master it. You dont want the game to be over very quickly. Arcade deathmatches against the computer are so fun, the mapmaker. Its worth the money. I cant comment on Perfect Dark but Timesplitters is a good game it does slow down a little from time to time but thats with all the bots in 1 player with all bots on screen firing rockets and hightec weapons so Its very fast and is a good purchase.

I have read many reviews of Timesplitter's and they all say different things about it. The images I have seen look dark and gloomy. People say that it's far to easy to complete, and unlike goldeneye, theres not much objectives in each level. Am I horribly wrong? Somebody set me straight! :P

Also what do you think is better: Perfect Dark (N64) OR Timesplitters?