The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
> any way i havn't had time to get my NOM yet can some one tell me the
> top three on the tony hawk 3 high score challenge
1. David Peacock - 10,374,124
2. Kevin Llewelyn - 7,656,193
3. Jack Williams - 5,993,705
> GEEK!
Oh my aching sides. I am so convinced. Aha. Aha. Ha.
They're both good, but future Publising's magazines have always been the best since Sega Power...
~~Belldandy~~
> Got my issue of NOM today - I was suprised it came so early. The extra
> supplement was a nicely put together magazine of up and coming Star
> Wars games.
>
> Just to point out though, NOM have been on an uphill streak over the
> last few months, with loads of improvements on the magazine it's
> unbelievable. They also rate games a lot better, and don't seem to be
> biased at all.
>
> Definitely the best Nintendo mag.
GEEK!
> Tiltawhirl wrote:
> >"The eco-friendly theme is refreshing, making the world
> beautiful is
> cool"
>
> LOL, I think the monkeys may have been replaced by 22 year old pot
> heads.
At least your saying your people unlike some typing chimp posters....
>"The eco-friendly theme is refreshing, making the world beautiful is
> cool"
LOL, I think the monkeys may have been replaced by 22 year old pot heads.
So do the majority of GC owners :D.
I read every page of NGC, even of games I'm not interested in, it's a far better magazine.
I wish NOM would be like it used to be.
Does anyone remember who the editor was around the time the N64 was released? He was some fat guy and they always made jokes comparing him to David Mariner from Waverace 64. Anywya, he was the best and so was the rest of the team. It was full of humour, some of it quite adult that the kids wouldn't get, there was none of this crap modern 'minimalist' layout they have now, and most importantely it was interesting. It was a bit like Conker's Bad Fur Day.