The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
There are 6 people banned on the Top 100 posters list and another on the sorted by words list. Thats more than I have ever, ever seen before.
Page:
Ultima Weapon wrote:
> Coley is professor frink...I think.
>
> UW.
Why are you telling me I am professor Frink I was Coley I got banned in April.
> Coley is professor frink...I think.
>
> UW.
Why are you telling me I am professor Frink I was Coley I got banned in April.
DW wrote:
> Right, I've missed it. Why was J Savo/Lethal Weapon banned? Hmmm...
--
He was banned simply because he was there.
:-D
> Right, I've missed it. Why was J Savo/Lethal Weapon banned? Hmmm...
--
He was banned simply because he was there.
:-D
Right, I've missed it. Why was J Savo/Lethal Weapon banned? Hmmm...
I think you should be allowed to use some foul words.I know some of you are thinking "Somebody please think of the children" but the lowest age would be about 13 and you already know the words from school anyway and most of it would be for a joke not to make fun of someone.
ElfMan wrote:
> whats the point
The point is, people come on here to win a game, the idea is to write a review in your own words and not copy something that someone has already done before.....ie put some of your own effort into writing a reveiw and then you'll be respected alot more.
Plus people who win and are then subsequently found to have copied deserve to have their prize/user taken away.
IMO for what ever it counts.
> whats the point
The point is, people come on here to win a game, the idea is to write a review in your own words and not copy something that someone has already done before.....ie put some of your own effort into writing a reveiw and then you'll be respected alot more.
Plus people who win and are then subsequently found to have copied deserve to have their prize/user taken away.
IMO for what ever it counts.
whats the point, you win or you dont win, it doesn't mean that ur reviews bad, it means others where better!! Why cheat, i dont see the point :S
Ingenium Bartender wrote:
> it only takes 10 minutes to write a review. It probably takes longer
> to search the web for a decent review that might not be picked up by a
> search engine.
>
> damn fools
Yeah but if you arern't good at english then you arent really going to have as good a chance of winning, as if you had just copied a review from some site.
> it only takes 10 minutes to write a review. It probably takes longer
> to search the web for a decent review that might not be picked up by a
> search engine.
>
> damn fools
Yeah but if you arern't good at english then you arent really going to have as good a chance of winning, as if you had just copied a review from some site.
it only takes 10 minutes to write a review. It probably takes longer to search the web for a decent review that might not be picked up by a search engine.
damn fools
damn fools
8 people now banned on the top 100 words list.....another one heads to the SR gravesite.
Page: