The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yep, as Afro said, indie shops like CA Games etc...have PAL Super MArio Sunshine in.
YAY!
And it rocks...
Fun, fun, fun all the way, I've only got a few shines cos I've been playing about a bit, the leaf boat and trying out wall jumping.
I would stay and say more, but this was just a quick break from it...
YAY!
And it rocks...
Fun, fun, fun all the way, I've only got a few shines cos I've been playing about a bit, the leaf boat and trying out wall jumping.
I would stay and say more, but this was just a quick break from it...
Page:
Blank wrote:
> If you were to say "It is a game of quality" I would've let
> it slide. It just annoys me people say "It's quality"
But typically quality means superior grade. Therefore saying a game is superior grade IS saying it is a good game.
> If you were to say "It is a game of quality" I would've let
> it slide. It just annoys me people say "It's quality"
But typically quality means superior grade. Therefore saying a game is superior grade IS saying it is a good game.
If you were to say "It is a game of quality" I would've let it slide. It just annoys me people say "It's quality"
cookie monster wrote:
>
> But saying "this game is quality" is an acknowledged phrase
> for saying the game is very good. Where as "this game has
> graphics" is just obvious.
Well some people acknowledge it, I don't. I like everything to be done properly. :)
>
> But saying "this game is quality" is an acknowledged phrase
> for saying the game is very good. Where as "this game has
> graphics" is just obvious.
Well some people acknowledge it, I don't. I like everything to be done properly. :)
I didn't even know the Bruce Lee game was out! It feels like only yesterday when there was a man from the development team on the TV talking about how the XBox could let them do nicer stuff or something - I saw it for the rectum sniffing that it was.
Blank wrote:
> cookie monster wrote:
> Explain how something that is bad can be of good quality?
>
> I never said it could be. My point was that just saying
> "quality" is not enough - there is good quality and bad
> quality. Quality on it's own would mean nothing in that context. It
> would be like saying "This game has graphics" - obviously it
> has graphics, but are they good or bad?
But saying "this game is quality" is an acknowledged phrase for saying the game is very good. Where as "this game has graphics" is just obvious.
> cookie monster wrote:
> Explain how something that is bad can be of good quality?
>
> I never said it could be. My point was that just saying
> "quality" is not enough - there is good quality and bad
> quality. Quality on it's own would mean nothing in that context. It
> would be like saying "This game has graphics" - obviously it
> has graphics, but are they good or bad?
But saying "this game is quality" is an acknowledged phrase for saying the game is very good. Where as "this game has graphics" is just obvious.
Silent85 wrote:
> Oliver Gibson speech that is and yes I mean look how much promise the
> bruce lee game had for xbox and ITS PAP(context dependant)
There's a big difference, for one this is Mario there hasn't been a single bad Mario adventure ever. Two, 99% of people have said it's superb, some even say it's one of the best games they've ever played. Three, did the Bruce Lee game really show any promise?
> Oliver Gibson speech that is and yes I mean look how much promise the
> bruce lee game had for xbox and ITS PAP(context dependant)
There's a big difference, for one this is Mario there hasn't been a single bad Mario adventure ever. Two, 99% of people have said it's superb, some even say it's one of the best games they've ever played. Three, did the Bruce Lee game really show any promise?
Well to start with if people liked Mario 64 then i think they will like this, don't you and you can tell if you will like a game.
Well i can, if i am waiting for a game i am never dissappointed!
Well i can, if i am waiting for a game i am never dissappointed!
cookie monster wrote:
> Explain how something that is bad can be of good quality?
I never said it could be. My point was that just saying "quality" is not enough - there is good quality and bad quality. Quality on it's own would mean nothing in that context. It would be like saying "This game has graphics" - obviously it has graphics, but are they good or bad?
> Explain how something that is bad can be of good quality?
I never said it could be. My point was that just saying "quality" is not enough - there is good quality and bad quality. Quality on it's own would mean nothing in that context. It would be like saying "This game has graphics" - obviously it has graphics, but are they good or bad?
Blank wrote:
> I wish people would stop saying things like "I am looking forward
> to this quality game". If you haven't played it, you don't know
> if it's any good or not. Also, quality doesn't necessarily mean it's
> good - you can have a bad quality game, you know. Your sentence should
> have read "I am looking forward to playing what will hopefully be
> a good quality game".
Oliver Gibson speech that is and yes I mean look how much promise the bruce lee game had for xbox and ITS PAP(context dependant)
> I wish people would stop saying things like "I am looking forward
> to this quality game". If you haven't played it, you don't know
> if it's any good or not. Also, quality doesn't necessarily mean it's
> good - you can have a bad quality game, you know. Your sentence should
> have read "I am looking forward to playing what will hopefully be
> a good quality game".
Oliver Gibson speech that is and yes I mean look how much promise the bruce lee game had for xbox and ITS PAP(context dependant)
Blank wrote:
> I wish people would stop saying things like "I am looking forward
> to this quality game". If you haven't played it, you don't know
> if it's any good or not. Also, quality doesn't necessarily mean it's
> good - you can have a bad quality game, you know. Your sentence should
> have read "I am looking forward to playing what will hopefully be
> a good quality game".
Explain how something that is bad can be of good quality?
> I wish people would stop saying things like "I am looking forward
> to this quality game". If you haven't played it, you don't know
> if it's any good or not. Also, quality doesn't necessarily mean it's
> good - you can have a bad quality game, you know. Your sentence should
> have read "I am looking forward to playing what will hopefully be
> a good quality game".
Explain how something that is bad can be of good quality?
Page: