The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
......Stand up and be counted boy, i think you owe DW an apology.
I don't think you realise what he's been through.
You should know better.
I don't think you realise what he's been through.
You should know better.
Page:
Oh my - Look everyone - Pointless Babble's ranting and arguing with people, Nothing much changes there then.
Just one question PB - If you really think that you are so superior to all these teenagers that you are arguing with here then why don't you just leave. Is it some kind of power / ego trip for you to think you can outsmart kids ?
Just one question PB - If you really think that you are so superior to all these teenagers that you are arguing with here then why don't you just leave. Is it some kind of power / ego trip for you to think you can outsmart kids ?
Ant wrote:
> Yes, I like facts.
You should utilise them more often then. ;)
> Really?
Yes, indeed. ;)
> Ah, but it may not when I'm at your mature, responsible age. I feel
> I'm reasonably clever for my age, I got in the top 10% of the country
> in an English test once. {:)
I think you'll find that it still will, for someone "reasonably clever" for their age you certainly don't look it. Speaking in slurred English for the most part of your posting, and contradicting yourself by stating you don't agree with one belief (evolution), whilst citing that "God" made you special in another comment. Plus you mention you only got in the top 10% of your English classes once whereas during my schooling I was in that margin persistantly, and continued to stay in it throughout A-Level literature, and onwards. ;)
That 10% of yours is really looking quite dim now. ;)
> Very good, lots of nice, big words in there.
Yes, I imagine you're having some difficulty with them, would you like to borrow a dictionary?
> On a regular basis, yes, but not in this forum. Usually in the Life
> Forum. Oh, and I can write a pretty good story too.
I asked if you were capable of making relevant comment, not whether you are good at creating works of fiction, so far the evidence suggests you're moderately to completely incapable of doing so.
Y'know, I think you'd fair better if you just stuck to your native mud slinging, your half-cocked retorts really pose no challenge for me to piece apart. Stick to what you know best, methinks. ;)
> Yes, I like facts.
You should utilise them more often then. ;)
> Really?
Yes, indeed. ;)
> Ah, but it may not when I'm at your mature, responsible age. I feel
> I'm reasonably clever for my age, I got in the top 10% of the country
> in an English test once. {:)
I think you'll find that it still will, for someone "reasonably clever" for their age you certainly don't look it. Speaking in slurred English for the most part of your posting, and contradicting yourself by stating you don't agree with one belief (evolution), whilst citing that "God" made you special in another comment. Plus you mention you only got in the top 10% of your English classes once whereas during my schooling I was in that margin persistantly, and continued to stay in it throughout A-Level literature, and onwards. ;)
That 10% of yours is really looking quite dim now. ;)
> Very good, lots of nice, big words in there.
Yes, I imagine you're having some difficulty with them, would you like to borrow a dictionary?
> On a regular basis, yes, but not in this forum. Usually in the Life
> Forum. Oh, and I can write a pretty good story too.
I asked if you were capable of making relevant comment, not whether you are good at creating works of fiction, so far the evidence suggests you're moderately to completely incapable of doing so.
Y'know, I think you'd fair better if you just stuck to your native mud slinging, your half-cocked retorts really pose no challenge for me to piece apart. Stick to what you know best, methinks. ;)
Go Ant!
*Waves a large Ant shaped flag*
*Waves a large Ant shaped flag*
Pointless Babble wrote:
> Well, lets take a look at the facts shall we, Ant? ;)
Yes, I like facts.
> 1) I am here, you are here.
Really?
> 2) My intelligence outgrades yours.
Ah, but it may not when I'm at your mature, responsible age. I feel I'm reasonably clever for my age, I got in the top 10% of the country in an English test once. {:)
> Now, the logical conclusion would be that my genome contains something
> that aided my nurture more than yours did, to the point of this
> outcome. Therefore, it would be methodical to assume in that case,
> that if there can be so many variations in a people there must be some
> process by which they advance.
Very good, lots of nice, big words in there. God made me special.
> Out of curiousity, do you ever make any relevant comments?
On a regular basis, yes, but not in this forum. Usually in the Life Forum. Oh, and I can write a pretty good story too.
> Well, lets take a look at the facts shall we, Ant? ;)
Yes, I like facts.
> 1) I am here, you are here.
Really?
> 2) My intelligence outgrades yours.
Ah, but it may not when I'm at your mature, responsible age. I feel I'm reasonably clever for my age, I got in the top 10% of the country in an English test once. {:)
> Now, the logical conclusion would be that my genome contains something
> that aided my nurture more than yours did, to the point of this
> outcome. Therefore, it would be methodical to assume in that case,
> that if there can be so many variations in a people there must be some
> process by which they advance.
Very good, lots of nice, big words in there. God made me special.
> Out of curiousity, do you ever make any relevant comments?
On a regular basis, yes, but not in this forum. Usually in the Life Forum. Oh, and I can write a pretty good story too.
gerrid wrote:
> Bare of a n00b.
>
> They call me Patrick Sueze
I repeat.
> Bare of a n00b.
>
> They call me Patrick Sueze
I repeat.
Well, lets take a look at the facts shall we, Ant? ;)
1) I am here, you are here.
2) My intelligence outgrades yours.
Now, the logical conclusion would be that my genome contains something that aided my nurture more than yours did, to the point of this outcome. Therefore, it would be methodical to assume in that case, that if there can be so many variations in a people there must be some process by which they advance.
Out of curiousity, do you ever make any relevant comments?
1) I am here, you are here.
2) My intelligence outgrades yours.
Now, the logical conclusion would be that my genome contains something that aided my nurture more than yours did, to the point of this outcome. Therefore, it would be methodical to assume in that case, that if there can be so many variations in a people there must be some process by which they advance.
Out of curiousity, do you ever make any relevant comments?
Pointless Babble wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> "Insolence personified" springs to mind.
>
> That you are, boy, that you are. ;)
True, but I'm not the one who apparently believes in the so-called 'evolutionary process'. ;)
> Ant wrote:
> "Insolence personified" springs to mind.
>
> That you are, boy, that you are. ;)
True, but I'm not the one who apparently believes in the so-called 'evolutionary process'. ;)
moderation wrote:
> PB really is and speaks a load of $h!t
*Laughs at the cretin*
Coming from you that really is rich. ;)
Even if that were the case, it would still place me several tiers above yourself in the evolutionary scale. ;)
> PB really is and speaks a load of $h!t
*Laughs at the cretin*
Coming from you that really is rich. ;)
Even if that were the case, it would still place me several tiers above yourself in the evolutionary scale. ;)
Tóm wrote:
> Pointless Babble, you clearly lashed out at DW. And you say he needs
> to grow up?
>
> You can't admit you're in the wrong. Who needs to grow up now?
PB really is and speaks a load of $h!t
> Pointless Babble, you clearly lashed out at DW. And you say he needs
> to grow up?
>
> You can't admit you're in the wrong. Who needs to grow up now?
PB really is and speaks a load of $h!t
Ant wrote:
> "Insolence personified" springs to mind.
That you are, boy, that you are. ;)
> "Insolence personified" springs to mind.
That you are, boy, that you are. ;)
Page: