Viewing Thread:
"September the 11th my tribute"

I've put together a simple tribute site.
here it is.

http://www.geocities.com/cheatser2/Sept11th_Tribute.html

The baby part was to reitarate how he doesn't realise what he's doing. Well, yes, to some degree, he does know what he's ding. But if he took the time to listen to what the world wanted, then he'd be singing a different tune.

Of course, he'd probably go ahead ad do what he wanted anyway...

Scouse Tw@t wrote:
> Precisely. He's too busy making everyone elses minds up for them. Look
> at Blair for example, he doesn't want to be seen
> "disagreeing" with the Prez, so he goes along with
> everything he says.


*

So a baby can actually make peoples' minds up for them, can it? I don't think you understood what I said.

The expression "Like a baby with a loaded gun" isn't used because a baby would be especially mallicious or want to kill everyone it sees. A baby holding a loaded gun is dangerous because the baby does not understand the power, fear and consequences it weilds.

I agree bush does need to finish one job before he starts the next, or he should at least wait for approval from the UN before launching a War on Iraq.

But I think he'll launch a war on Iraq whatever the UN say.

what I think should happen when somebody wants to declare war is there should be some sort of public vote as well as the UN's desicion.
but the vote would only help president/kings ect. decide what they think is best for their country.

but in this case an all out war may not be the answer, a series of covert operations and possibly some negotiation should do the job.
but that's highly unlikely with Saddam.

I don't think this is a war on Terror any more Bush seems to be using the war on Terror as an excuse to finish of Saddam.
something Bush Senior never did?

why?

Probabaly because Bush senior was perhaps one of the best presidents america ever had,
also because he new when he had gone to far and he quitted while he still had his pride.

So Bush Jr beware, because Saddam is indeed as evil as everybody says he is and he has the ways, the means and the will to use Weapons Of Mass destruction.
and beleive me if he has obne then surely he'll use it.

Other nuclear armed countries have nuclear weapons to defend themselfs from poeple like Saddam or to deal with a cosmic threat i.e Asteriods
but in Saddams case he has them so he can use them against anyone he doesn't like or he sees as a threat.

Infact it would surpise me if Saddam and Bin Laden were working together to plot terrorist attacks on Britan and the US, I don't know when this might be but it's highly likely.
I have a funny feeling it might happen on Friday the 13th of September.
they would use Friday the 13th being as it is a superstitious day (Supposed to be unlucky) it is certainly probabale and we should remain on high alert untill at least sunday.

Sadamm is a real threat and he needs to be dealt with,
but is War the answer?
You decide!

Precisely. He's too busy making everyone elses minds up for them. Look at Blair for example, he doesn't want to be seen "disagreeing" with the Prez, so he goes along with everything he says.

Scouse Tw@t wrote:
> Bush IS too dangerous, don't even deny that fact. He's like a baby
> with a loaded gun.


*

So what you're saying is that he does not comprehend the power he holds?

Bush IS too dangerous, don't even deny that fact. He's like a baby with a loaded gun.

And in amidst all this "let's attack Iraq" rubbish, Bin Laden is still out there, smoking his Cuban cigars and what-not. Bush needs to get his priorities sorted out first. Priority 1: Get Bin Laden, the reason for all this anger. Priority 2: THEN stop Saddam.

Let me guess, your a Tauros, or a saggitarian?

I'll get back to talking computer games, when I talk about subjects like this my views just offend people.

So watz bttr Gayciube or Bill Box?

ya bum :p

Doughnut Monster wrote:
> lol, well i'm glad that's sorted.
>
>
> raaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


*

Looks like my work here is done.

WHOOOOOOSH etc