Viewing Thread:
"Hot Lesbian Action"

Apparently, this is the title for one of the segments on RAW. Okay, it may be a bit of fun, but I don't really wanna watch it with my 11-year-old brother.

And if my parents saw...

Apparently, it involved 2 girls. S'all I know for the moment.

Another rather questionable RAW idea.

they showed the HLA but didn't bother showing the bit where Rosie and Jamal beat them up conveniently went to break

Lol at MoJoooooooooo.

A$hcutu5 wrote:
> I don't care as long as its good!!!

--------

Um... you seem to be missing the fact that if they cut it out (which they could, but since there's a lot of build up for it during the show, I doubt they will) then you WON'T BE ABLE TO SEE IT. Hence, it will not matter whether it is good or not, as you will not see it. Do you see?

Jetster wrote:
> I bet Sky Sports cut it out anyway.

I don't care as long as its good!!!

p.s. send your brother to the shops!!!

p.p.s send your parents to the supermarket and/or the pub :D

I bet Sky Sports cut it out anyway.

Ratings are confusing. 1.0 is like three quarters of a million or something like that (I'm sure I'm way off there, but that's the sort of stuff it is)

Why can't they just use the term "viewers" like they do here, so you know how many people watched it by looking at it immediatly, ie 7 million or whatever

It didn't help the ratings in America either. Apparently, it did a 3.4 which is the lowest rating it has had in 4 years.

Oh My God. What a couple of ugly carpet munchers. Man, that has really put me off.

http://www.backstagewrestling.com/galleries/raw_hla/020.jpg

http://www.backstagewrestling.com/galleries/raw_hla/013.jpg

There you go

Yes, the words you're looking for are "ugly" "terrible" "disturbing" "vomit inducing"

Thank you, and good night

Jetster wrote:
> I'm going to be watching it! Oh baby I'm getting aroused just thinking
> aboot it :)


Same here!