The "Xbox Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
but really these nintys are having a laugh, there's like a handful of games that are good on the GC and a shed load (a big shed to) on the x box. and the PS2? well the games companys can't be bothered with it anymore so why should i LOL.
well i might get stuntman and tekken 4 but still.
anyway what i hate about these nintys are the games they say are so good really aint. ok so it's a matter of taste and if i was 5 1/2 i'd love a GC but i'm 20 and i want blood and gore.
most GC owners must be about 10 as they argue like kids and get all up tight if you slate mario and everyone knows sonic is better.
if i had my way sega would still have a console and it would be ninty the game developer and i'd have me sega machine next to an x box and live happlying ever after knowing all the nintys would be crying as they haven't got the guts to buy a non nintendo machine muahahahahhahahahaha
ok so this post will probably encourage them but why can't we all be happy gamers?
oh well naff all i can do except laugh at there little faces and there silly little cube, sav had a GC for about a week and he found a use for the handle LOL
> Honestly, is sl@gging off another
> console more important than playing or talking about games on the
> machine you own?
You might wanna write that in the Ninty forum while your at it as its easy to lose count of the amount of mongs that make the transition from that forum to this one with similar if not worse comments.
Not saying 2 wrongs make a right, but I can tell you now we put up with a lot more of this crap in here than the Ninty forum has to deal with and 9 times out of 10, at least the ones that are making these comments about the GC are saying it in this forum rather than going into the Ninty forum and mouthing off.
Trust me, people in here would LOVE the chance to talk about games more, unfortunatly there seems to be some fanboy (the majority of them Ninties) policy thats against us doing so in peace without pathetic little comments and topics.
A thinking mans shooter, no gung ho heroics will win mission in this game, you have to work as a team with your A.I. soldiers to get through the levels alive. Plus with the added realism, wide array of vehicles and mission which stand head and shoulders above other, disappointing Tactical squad games like *spits* Ghost Recon, this is a games which gives you difficult, but also fun challenges.
As for this argument, well I don't really like replying to things like the original post, as quite frankly arguments like this I find a pathetic waste of everybody's time. Honestly, is sl@gging off another console more important than playing or talking about games on the machine you own?
Halo 2 will no doubt use tactics again so its not a simple case of running in all guns blazing and coming out without a scratch like a lot of FPS games.
> Well Rainbow Six: Raven Shield is coming to X-Box along with the likes
> of Ghost Recon and Conflict: Desert Storm.
I did say they're weren't many, the three isn't very many now is it? Besides, Raven Shield, Splinter cell etc are multi-format.
And Edgy, you just copied exactly what I said!
> LOL to say the GC isn't grown up i mean come on, look at the games and
> there style on sav's E3 DVD you have to pick this DVD up as the GC
> lineup makes me laugh so much.
Indeed, GameCube games are funny. That is a good thing. They entertain you and you just admitted it.
>
> then you got x box with it's "thinking games" where there's
> a bit more than jumping platform to platform.
>
Sure, you've got games which require you to use your mind, but that happens on all consoles. If you didn't have to think in any games, then here wouldn't be any challenge.
> also look how boxed in metroid looks,
The only shots so far have been indoor shots. What would you rather? A sci-fi shooter based in Dartmoor? A sci-fic shooter based in the Sahara where you can see for miles and miles?
in halo you have vast open
> landscapes you can see for miles it gives a great feel for distance
Oh goody, I can kill the enemy before it becomes a threat!
on
> metriod your so boxed in that fighting 1 enemy without getting hit is
> almost impossible.
That's what makes it challenging - if that's the case. Considering I've never played the game and neither have you, slating if for the way it plays is not a fair argument.
> LOL to say the GC isn't grown up i mean come on, look at the games and
> there style on sav's E3 DVD you have to pick this DVD up as the GC
> lineup makes me laugh so much.
Your face makes me laugh so much. HA HA HA Look at your face! Taffer.
>
> then you got x box with it's "thinking games" where there's
> a bit more than jumping platform to platform.
Thinking games? Okay now that *is* funny.
Lets see now...umm..running and shooting...driving fast...hack n slash...
Nope, no thinking games. If you had a brain you'd realise that hardly any 'console' games are thinking games. They were always designed to be more of a 'pick up and play' style.
>
> also look how boxed in metroid looks, in halo you have vast open
> landscapes you can see for miles it gives a great feel for distance
It's called a building you @£%&ing moron, how many buildings have you walked through that had corridors anymore than about 3 metres across? And Personally I think that stalking through a dark corridor, with some steam coming out of pipes, strange noises coming from up ahead, not knowing which way to turn at crossways etc is much more atmospheric than running through a huge field where you can see everything coming 10 minutes before it arrives!*
*I'm not saying this is what its like in Halo, it's just he said huge open landscapes were better.
on
> metriod your so boxed in that fighting 1 enemy without getting hit is
> almost impossible.
And you'd know that because you've played it I suppose?