The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I got my gamecube new and only have 2 games pikmin and batman vengance but i want a really good game like tony hawks 1,2,3 our final fatasey 8 and i also want a really good game for my gameboy advance i here golden sun is really good is that true
Page:
goku4ever wrote:
> Oh yeah Star fox adventures will take quite a long time to complete, i
> heard it was going to be put onto 2 discs, and it will take 80 hours
> to complete, thats a long time.
80 hours for you maybe.
> Oh yeah Star fox adventures will take quite a long time to complete, i
> heard it was going to be put onto 2 discs, and it will take 80 hours
> to complete, thats a long time.
80 hours for you maybe.
When else do you have GCSE's and "A levels" buddy.
Any way didn't u look at the article in this months 'Nintendo Official Magazine' or have you also been short for money.
Any way didn't u look at the article in this months 'Nintendo Official Magazine' or have you also been short for money.
buddy, ha ha
you honestly beleive that it will take 80 hours to complete?, you beleive everything you read.
you really are stupid arent you.
1)their an official magazine so their blatently going to hype it up.
2) have you read the reviews, seen the screnn shots, played any rpg's b4? if you have then you'll know that it will never take 80 hours to complete.
3) just because it comes on two discs doesnt mean it will take forever to complete. look at Metal Gear Solid and Syphon Filter .
you honestly beleive that it will take 80 hours to complete?, you beleive everything you read.
you really are stupid arent you.
1)their an official magazine so their blatently going to hype it up.
2) have you read the reviews, seen the screnn shots, played any rpg's b4? if you have then you'll know that it will never take 80 hours to complete.
3) just because it comes on two discs doesnt mean it will take forever to complete. look at Metal Gear Solid and Syphon Filter .
Pokemon supposedly took 60 hours + so shut it boxcar boy!
have you played RPGs before?
Have you played this game before?
no
How can you say how long it will take?
Baldurs Gate, Diablo, Planescape:Torment, Neverwinter Nights. All these games take 50+ hours to complete. All RPGs.
What do you know?
Have you played this game before?
no
How can you say how long it will take?
Baldurs Gate, Diablo, Planescape:Torment, Neverwinter Nights. All these games take 50+ hours to complete. All RPGs.
What do you know?
gerrid wrote:
> have you played RPGs before?
> Have you played this game before?
> no
> How can you say how long it will take?
> Baldurs Gate, Diablo, Planescape:Torment, Neverwinter Nights. All
> these games take 50+ hours to complete. All RPGs.
> What do you know?
more than you obviously, youve just answered your own point, when i said its more likely to take 40 hours, and then you say it took you in the region of 50 hrs to complete these rpg's. so u really think that this will take an extra 30?? are you totally stupid.
and i didnt say "it will take 40.5 hrs",or anything specific all i was saying is that i dont think 80 hours is realistic, espcially if you've ever played rpgs b4. it'll be a lot less and i stand by my point, but i guess we'll see when its released. if you ever finish it!
> have you played RPGs before?
> Have you played this game before?
> no
> How can you say how long it will take?
> Baldurs Gate, Diablo, Planescape:Torment, Neverwinter Nights. All
> these games take 50+ hours to complete. All RPGs.
> What do you know?
more than you obviously, youve just answered your own point, when i said its more likely to take 40 hours, and then you say it took you in the region of 50 hrs to complete these rpg's. so u really think that this will take an extra 30?? are you totally stupid.
and i didnt say "it will take 40.5 hrs",or anything specific all i was saying is that i dont think 80 hours is realistic, espcially if you've ever played rpgs b4. it'll be a lot less and i stand by my point, but i guess we'll see when its released. if you ever finish it!
Actually, you didn't say that 80 hours wasn't realistic, you asked everyone of they were stupid and then said "it won't be 80 hours because it's an RPG and no RPGs are 80 hours" or something. You could have said that 80 hours wasn't reasonable, which would have been fine, but you decided to be foolish instead. Now no one takes you seriously.
gerrid wrote:
> Actually, you didn't say that 80 hours wasn't realistic, you asked
> everyone of they were stupid and then said "it won't be 80 hours
> because it's an RPG and no RPGs are 80 hours" or something. You
> could have said that 80 hours wasn't reasonable, which would have been
> fine, but you decided to be foolish instead. Now no one takes you
> seriously.
one thats makes no sense, but i think i know wot ur on about,
no yet again ur wrong, i said it would be nearer half, and i didnt say everyone was stupid, i sadi you were stupid. which you proving right now,
> Actually, you didn't say that 80 hours wasn't realistic, you asked
> everyone of they were stupid and then said "it won't be 80 hours
> because it's an RPG and no RPGs are 80 hours" or something. You
> could have said that 80 hours wasn't reasonable, which would have been
> fine, but you decided to be foolish instead. Now no one takes you
> seriously.
one thats makes no sense, but i think i know wot ur on about,
no yet again ur wrong, i said it would be nearer half, and i didnt say everyone was stupid, i sadi you were stupid. which you proving right now,
Yes. You "sadi" that I was stupid. Why exactly? Because I can't spell? Because I make no sense? Or because I make talk rubbish?
Which one of these makes me stupid boxcar_boy. You decide
Which one of these makes me stupid boxcar_boy. You decide
boxcar_boy wrote:
>
> one thats makes no sense, but i think i know wot ur on about,
>
> no yet again ur wrong, i said it would be nearer half, and i didnt say
> everyone was stupid, i sadi you were stupid. which you proving right
> now,
Where'd you learn punctuation like that? You must've had record grades in your school! Record low!
>
> one thats makes no sense, but i think i know wot ur on about,
>
> no yet again ur wrong, i said it would be nearer half, and i didnt say
> everyone was stupid, i sadi you were stupid. which you proving right
> now,
Where'd you learn punctuation like that? You must've had record grades in your school! Record low!
Page: