The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Hello.
In this passage, I will to refer to many things, this is what they mean.
"Regulars" - These kind hearted people come onto your website, and have fun talking to eachother, and post some great topics about games. Examples of these are: Ant, Elitesniper, Dan, Fogmaster, Fantasymeister. These people hardly win games, compared to the amount of work they do.
"We" - This also refers to the "regulars".
"Newbies" - These are the people that come on here SOLELY to win games, 95% of these will write one thing, steal a game from you, and then leave. The remaining 5% will stay after winning a game. These people do less work, and win more games.
"Staff" - This refers to anyone that works at Special Reserve.
We are getting very tired, and agitated at the fact that people come on here and win games, and never come back here again. This portrays the feeling of the forum simply being "used". We do not treat this forum like the 95% of newbies do. I.E. We do not have one night stands.
We care about the forum, and we enjoy returning to it, to post more things about games, and to talk to eachother. It is a social gathering as well as a games forum.
The staff, I believe, fail to see that we put much more effort and work into the site than the 95% of newbies, and also fail to realise that the newbies put no effort into maintaining their status in the forum.
Therefore, I propose this compremise. The newbies are unable to win, UNLESS they post at least 10 decent posts, which all refer to the name of the forum.
I have no say on the status of the reviews. I am happy that people can win with one review. I am unhappy with the fact that we put more time into the site than they do, but I understand that reviews have a better chance of winning a game.
However, it seems that newbies have a better chance than we do of winning a game. It also seems that whoever chooses gameaday fails to fully take in what has been written, and will ignore it if they have won before.
To summarise: We are unhappy with amount of newbies which simply leave after winning; we want newbies to post 10 decent topics before winning, to make the forum more effienent; and we want to have the same chance as winning as the newbies, which will also encourage more people to stay.
Thank you for reading. Any comments from the regulars will be welcomed.
In this passage, I will to refer to many things, this is what they mean.
"Regulars" - These kind hearted people come onto your website, and have fun talking to eachother, and post some great topics about games. Examples of these are: Ant, Elitesniper, Dan, Fogmaster, Fantasymeister. These people hardly win games, compared to the amount of work they do.
"We" - This also refers to the "regulars".
"Newbies" - These are the people that come on here SOLELY to win games, 95% of these will write one thing, steal a game from you, and then leave. The remaining 5% will stay after winning a game. These people do less work, and win more games.
"Staff" - This refers to anyone that works at Special Reserve.
We are getting very tired, and agitated at the fact that people come on here and win games, and never come back here again. This portrays the feeling of the forum simply being "used". We do not treat this forum like the 95% of newbies do. I.E. We do not have one night stands.
We care about the forum, and we enjoy returning to it, to post more things about games, and to talk to eachother. It is a social gathering as well as a games forum.
The staff, I believe, fail to see that we put much more effort and work into the site than the 95% of newbies, and also fail to realise that the newbies put no effort into maintaining their status in the forum.
Therefore, I propose this compremise. The newbies are unable to win, UNLESS they post at least 10 decent posts, which all refer to the name of the forum.
I have no say on the status of the reviews. I am happy that people can win with one review. I am unhappy with the fact that we put more time into the site than they do, but I understand that reviews have a better chance of winning a game.
However, it seems that newbies have a better chance than we do of winning a game. It also seems that whoever chooses gameaday fails to fully take in what has been written, and will ignore it if they have won before.
To summarise: We are unhappy with amount of newbies which simply leave after winning; we want newbies to post 10 decent topics before winning, to make the forum more effienent; and we want to have the same chance as winning as the newbies, which will also encourage more people to stay.
Thank you for reading. Any comments from the regulars will be welcomed.
Page:
Hello.
In this passage, I will to refer to many things, this is what they mean.
"Regulars" - These kind hearted people come onto your website, and have fun talking to eachother, and post some great topics about games. Examples of these are: Ant, Elitesniper, Dan, Fogmaster, Fantasymeister. These people hardly win games, compared to the amount of work they do.
"We" - This also refers to the "regulars".
"Newbies" - These are the people that come on here SOLELY to win games, 95% of these will write one thing, steal a game from you, and then leave. The remaining 5% will stay after winning a game. These people do less work, and win more games.
"Staff" - This refers to anyone that works at Special Reserve.
We are getting very tired, and agitated at the fact that people come on here and win games, and never come back here again. This portrays the feeling of the forum simply being "used". We do not treat this forum like the 95% of newbies do. I.E. We do not have one night stands.
We care about the forum, and we enjoy returning to it, to post more things about games, and to talk to eachother. It is a social gathering as well as a games forum.
The staff, I believe, fail to see that we put much more effort and work into the site than the 95% of newbies, and also fail to realise that the newbies put no effort into maintaining their status in the forum.
Therefore, I propose this compremise. The newbies are unable to win, UNLESS they post at least 10 decent posts, which all refer to the name of the forum.
I have no say on the status of the reviews. I am happy that people can win with one review. I am unhappy with the fact that we put more time into the site than they do, but I understand that reviews have a better chance of winning a game.
However, it seems that newbies have a better chance than we do of winning a game. It also seems that whoever chooses gameaday fails to fully take in what has been written, and will ignore it if they have won before.
To summarise: We are unhappy with amount of newbies which simply leave after winning; we want newbies to post 10 decent topics before winning, to make the forum more effienent; and we want to have the same chance as winning as the newbies, which will also encourage more people to stay.
Thank you for reading. Any comments from the regulars will be welcomed.
In this passage, I will to refer to many things, this is what they mean.
"Regulars" - These kind hearted people come onto your website, and have fun talking to eachother, and post some great topics about games. Examples of these are: Ant, Elitesniper, Dan, Fogmaster, Fantasymeister. These people hardly win games, compared to the amount of work they do.
"We" - This also refers to the "regulars".
"Newbies" - These are the people that come on here SOLELY to win games, 95% of these will write one thing, steal a game from you, and then leave. The remaining 5% will stay after winning a game. These people do less work, and win more games.
"Staff" - This refers to anyone that works at Special Reserve.
We are getting very tired, and agitated at the fact that people come on here and win games, and never come back here again. This portrays the feeling of the forum simply being "used". We do not treat this forum like the 95% of newbies do. I.E. We do not have one night stands.
We care about the forum, and we enjoy returning to it, to post more things about games, and to talk to eachother. It is a social gathering as well as a games forum.
The staff, I believe, fail to see that we put much more effort and work into the site than the 95% of newbies, and also fail to realise that the newbies put no effort into maintaining their status in the forum.
Therefore, I propose this compremise. The newbies are unable to win, UNLESS they post at least 10 decent posts, which all refer to the name of the forum.
I have no say on the status of the reviews. I am happy that people can win with one review. I am unhappy with the fact that we put more time into the site than they do, but I understand that reviews have a better chance of winning a game.
However, it seems that newbies have a better chance than we do of winning a game. It also seems that whoever chooses gameaday fails to fully take in what has been written, and will ignore it if they have won before.
To summarise: We are unhappy with amount of newbies which simply leave after winning; we want newbies to post 10 decent topics before winning, to make the forum more effienent; and we want to have the same chance as winning as the newbies, which will also encourage more people to stay.
Thank you for reading. Any comments from the regulars will be welcomed.
If this won gameaday, would it make you feel guilty of winning a game due to a completely un gaming topic!
Talking about Gamaday, now the new Zelda has been released, how long do you think it will be before it arrives (or have you already got it!)
Talking about Gamaday, now the new Zelda has been released, how long do you think it will be before it arrives (or have you already got it!)
Tuesday.
I won't win gameaday for this. All I ask is the staff read it, and truly consider it.
I won't win gameaday for this. All I ask is the staff read it, and truly consider it.
They might let you win just to make you feel bad...
As the staff will be reading this, who won the Naming contest?
Tony, webmaster and Ali read this! It will change the course of the history of Special Reserve or whatever name it will turn out to be.
Dan_uk wrote:
> If this won gameaday, would it make you feel guilty of winning a
> game due to a completely un gaming topic!
>
> Talking about Gamaday, now the new Zelda has been released, how
> long do you think it will be before it arrives (or have you
> already got it!)
On Monday I will check to ensure that Gameaday winners are getting their prizes sent out at the same time as all other pre-orders. We don't want you guys to have to wait for all the luverly new games you win
> If this won gameaday, would it make you feel guilty of winning a
> game due to a completely un gaming topic!
>
> Talking about Gamaday, now the new Zelda has been released, how
> long do you think it will be before it arrives (or have you
> already got it!)
On Monday I will check to ensure that Gameaday winners are getting their prizes sent out at the same time as all other pre-orders. We don't want you guys to have to wait for all the luverly new games you win
Grix Thraves wrote:
> Tuesday.
>
> I won't win gameaday for this. All I ask is the staff read it, and
> truly consider it.
The spirit of this competition is that the best contribution on the day should win. I looked through the winners list and saw a fair smattering of regulars. Even SimonSays has won once! (I'm sorry Simon, but you were quite lucky that day)
It's quite clear that the same people can win any day - even on consecutive days.
Where I think we can change slightly is to mark higher for entertainment value rather than spelling, grammar or length of message.
Of course I have no idea how Ali chooses the winners. It's up to him and nobody would dream of interfering. I'm sure he will read your messages.
> Tuesday.
>
> I won't win gameaday for this. All I ask is the staff read it, and
> truly consider it.
The spirit of this competition is that the best contribution on the day should win. I looked through the winners list and saw a fair smattering of regulars. Even SimonSays has won once! (I'm sorry Simon, but you were quite lucky that day)
It's quite clear that the same people can win any day - even on consecutive days.
Where I think we can change slightly is to mark higher for entertainment value rather than spelling, grammar or length of message.
Of course I have no idea how Ali chooses the winners. It's up to him and nobody would dream of interfering. I'm sure he will read your messages.
Dan_uk wrote:
> As the staff will be reading this, who won the Naming contest?
I'm not telling you who won the naming contest but unfortunately is was not somebody with an alias starting with Dan!
> As the staff will be reading this, who won the Naming contest?
I'm not telling you who won the naming contest but unfortunately is was not somebody with an alias starting with Dan!
When i won PDark it came after a week of release, that was excellent. There were some people that won the game after me and got it about 2/3 weeks afterwards, if the game is free I can wait as long as possible, there are other things to do with my time. Has anyone got Cubase VST? it's so good, making lots of tunes, SR I realised you don't sell this! you have some nasty looking keyboards and some nice soundcards but no decent music progs.
Page: