The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
You are about to embark on a journey of great rewards where your combat and strategy skills will be challenged and honed to a fine edge
thats all there is, no clues as yet, if im given any i'll pass em on.
whoever helps me solve it gets to hug machie
clue 1: Breakfast anyone?
clue 2: Yes or No
clue 3: clue
I think the binary definately has something to do with it, but no idea what
thats all there is, no clues as yet, if im given any i'll pass em on.
whoever helps me solve it gets to hug machie
clue 1: Breakfast anyone?
clue 2: Yes or No
clue 3: clue
I think the binary definately has something to do with it, but no idea what
Page:
You are about to embark on a journey of great rewards where your combat and strategy skills will be challenged and honed to a fine edge
thats all there is, no clues as yet, if im given any i'll pass em on.
whoever helps me solve it gets to hug machie
clue 1: Breakfast anyone?
clue 2: Yes or No
clue 3: clue
I think the binary definately has something to do with it, but no idea what
thats all there is, no clues as yet, if im given any i'll pass em on.
whoever helps me solve it gets to hug machie
clue 1: Breakfast anyone?
clue 2: Yes or No
clue 3: clue
I think the binary definately has something to do with it, but no idea what
No, they just copied the phrase because it sounds good.
what's it for?
The problem with codes and ciphers is there is usually a key to cracking them. Without the key or even what we are looking for, it's difficult.
I separated the bold letters and the normal letters and tried to spot any words. I saw 'or' 'on' 'eat' 'rumba' 'coat' 'about' and 'till'. There may be a few more. It doesn't mean a lot to me.
I separated the bold letters and the normal letters and tried to spot any words. I saw 'or' 'on' 'eat' 'rumba' 'coat' 'about' and 'till'. There may be a few more. It doesn't mean a lot to me.
The bold letters in the order they appear are:
yuaboutoebrkrygrtrshrumbadraegysksleaedheafnege
(could someone post the same for non-bold)
It's 47 letters long (missed 3 characters first time :p, I think that's right now). There's an absence of the letter i; which you probably wouldn't expect in a standard piece of English text although it's not a huge string. That probably suggests it has either had some form of cipher applied to it but the letter 'e' is the most frequent so that is unlikely - or it's not intended to represent a piece of text on its own.
What is this from, btw?
yuaboutoebrkrygrtrshrumbadraegysksleaedheafnege
(could someone post the same for non-bold)
It's 47 letters long (missed 3 characters first time :p, I think that's right now). There's an absence of the letter i; which you probably wouldn't expect in a standard piece of English text although it's not a huge string. That probably suggests it has either had some form of cipher applied to it but the letter 'e' is the most frequent so that is unlikely - or it's not intended to represent a piece of text on its own.
What is this from, btw?
I would say that seeing as it has not been written specifically for a code (it's been lifted from a game i believe), you should be looking at the way it's written, not whats written. The spacing between the bold is probably the key.
Bob_The_Moose wrote:
> ... There's an absence of the letter i; which you
> probably wouldn't expect in a standard piece of English text
The words "skills", "will" and "fine" are in there.
> ... There's an absence of the letter i; which you
> probably wouldn't expect in a standard piece of English text
The words "skills", "will" and "fine" are in there.
I meant once you separated the bold and non-bold characters. There are no i's in the bold set. But I hadn't realised there were only 3 i's in the whole thing so maybe that's just chance. After playing around with them as separate strings for a while I haven't got them to give to anything obvious so Nin's mention of the spacing is probably more promising.
I get bold characters to be at positions:
[0, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 25, 31, 32, 35, 36, 42, 44, 46, 50, 54, 55, 58, 60, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 74, 77, 80, 83, 86, 93, 94, 97, 101, 102, 104, 105, 108, 109]
umm... treating the first character as position zero.
And the distances between two consecutive characters is apparently
[2, 1, 4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 7, 6, 1, 3, 1, 6, 2, 2, 4, 4, 1, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 7, 1, 3, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1]
I get bold characters to be at positions:
[0, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 25, 31, 32, 35, 36, 42, 44, 46, 50, 54, 55, 58, 60, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 74, 77, 80, 83, 86, 93, 94, 97, 101, 102, 104, 105, 108, 109]
umm... treating the first character as position zero.
And the distances between two consecutive characters is apparently
[2, 1, 4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 7, 6, 1, 3, 1, 6, 2, 2, 4, 4, 1, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 7, 1, 3, 4, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1]
Page: