The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Write, lets see who you should think should be the next Notable and why.
I dont really know that many so i can't choose just yet.
I dont really know that many so i can't choose just yet.
Page:
Ooooooooh i've got an election.
Yeah. It's [email protected]
SolidSnakeXXI wrote:
> J Savo wrote:
> SolidSnakeXXI wrote:
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan
> through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
>
> yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
>
> what is that smell
>
> *looks at joinercus*
>
> Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
>
> *realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL*
>
> LOL
Hey, U got a MSN addy SSXXI
> J Savo wrote:
> SolidSnakeXXI wrote:
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan
> through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
>
> yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
>
> what is that smell
>
> *looks at joinercus*
>
> Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
>
> *realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL*
>
> LOL
Hey, U got a MSN addy SSXXI
J Savo wrote:
> SolidSnakeXXI wrote:
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan
> through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
>
> yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
>
> what is that smell
>
> *looks at joinercus*
>
> Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
>
> *realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL*
LOL
> SolidSnakeXXI wrote:
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan
> through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
>
> yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
>
> what is that smell
>
> *looks at joinercus*
>
> Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
>
> *realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL*
LOL
SolidSnakeXXI wrote:
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
what is that smell
*looks at joinercus*
Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
*realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL*
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
what is that smell
*looks at joinercus*
Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
*realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL*
SolidSnakeXXI wrote:
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
what is that smell
*looks at joinercus*
Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL
> J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
>
> Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan through
> threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then
> maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for
> someone looking purely at figures.
yeah-you tell him SolidSnakeXXI
what is that smell
*looks at joinercus*
Is that you SolidSnakeXXI
realises it isn't then boots joinercus in the B*lls, then LOL
J Savo wrote:
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan through threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for someone looking purely at figures.
> >Joinercus wrote:
> >Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
>
> this will just waste time you GIMP
Yeah - I agree. If you want to know who to vote for, just scan through threads and see who comes up with the most interesting points. Then maybe if you're unsure you can check their stats. You can't vote for someone looking purely at figures.
Joinercus wrote:
> Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
this will just waste time you GIMP
> Check the stats of every Regular, or possibly newbie.
this will just waste time you GIMP
Page: