The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This is if France go out of course, which looks likely
it Happened to Beckham..
or is the hatrad just an English thing?
it Happened to Beckham..
or is the hatrad just an English thing?
Page:
Dario Silva should have also got his marching orders, wot a gimp.
Shepps wrote:
> Bit of a mickey take though how Henry got sent off yet Dario Silva the
> cheating little goon didn't.
My thoughts exactly.
> Bit of a mickey take though how Henry got sent off yet Dario Silva the
> cheating little goon didn't.
My thoughts exactly.
I think the ref was in danger of loosing control of the game and wanted to stamp down his authority.
Henry was the unlucky guy to be on the wrong end of it.
You can't say that Henry has a habit of chopping players down, like Keane.
It was a classic center forwards tackle, and should have been treated as such, with a yellow card.
Henry was the unlucky guy to be on the wrong end of it.
You can't say that Henry has a habit of chopping players down, like Keane.
It was a classic center forwards tackle, and should have been treated as such, with a yellow card.
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> Meka Dragon wrote:
> Either way, you can't argue that it wasn't guay.
>
> Indeed. Bloody guay-lord! ;-)
Homer Simpson, looking at a globe:
"Hehe, there's a country called You are gay"
> Meka Dragon wrote:
> Either way, you can't argue that it wasn't guay.
>
> Indeed. Bloody guay-lord! ;-)
Homer Simpson, looking at a globe:
"Hehe, there's a country called You are gay"
The French won't hate Henry, he just put in a rash tackle. The Beckham thing was different cos what Beckham did was stupid, Henry just made an honest mistake.
Bit of a mickey take though how Henry got sent off yet Dario Silva the cheating little goon didn't.
Bit of a mickey take though how Henry got sent off yet Dario Silva the cheating little goon didn't.
Meka Dragon wrote:
> Either way, you can't argue that it wasn't guay.
Indeed. Bloody guay-lord! ;-)
> Either way, you can't argue that it wasn't guay.
Indeed. Bloody guay-lord! ;-)
AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> Lol I was waiting for your comments wookie, typical Arsenal Fan :D
Got nothing to do with Arsenal, mate. He wasn't playing for Arsenal!
I genuinely think it was a very harsh decision. It wasn't from behind, he only just missed the ball, and the Uruaguay player could have avoided the challenge. The guy went so far up in the air it was ridiculous! Even a yellow would have been harsh.
> if it was David Beckham or Roy Keane that had done it.. would you be
> saying the same thing??
>
> Thought not :D
You thought wrong then. I'm not a fan of Beckham, and I can't stand Keane - but the fact is, it wasn't that bad a challenge.
> Lol I was waiting for your comments wookie, typical Arsenal Fan :D
Got nothing to do with Arsenal, mate. He wasn't playing for Arsenal!
I genuinely think it was a very harsh decision. It wasn't from behind, he only just missed the ball, and the Uruaguay player could have avoided the challenge. The guy went so far up in the air it was ridiculous! Even a yellow would have been harsh.
> if it was David Beckham or Roy Keane that had done it.. would you be
> saying the same thing??
>
> Thought not :D
You thought wrong then. I'm not a fan of Beckham, and I can't stand Keane - but the fact is, it wasn't that bad a challenge.
Either way, you can't argue that it wasn't guay.
AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> *It was Uruguay*
Indeed, but I was typing quickly without thinking.
> *It was Uruguay*
Indeed, but I was typing quickly without thinking.
AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> Doesnt it also depend on what happens in the other game, since France
> are bottom, if Urguay beat beat Senegal and France beat Denmark lose
> 2-0 to France, would that not mean Senegal and Uraguy go through?
If France win 2-0 they will have goal difference of +1, and Denmark would be -1.
If Uruguay also beat Senegal 1-0 Urugauy would have GD of 0 and Senegal 0. Uruguay and France would go through, with France group winners.
If France only win 1-0 they would have the same goal difference as Denmark, but Denmark would have scored 2 goals in total, and France only 1. France would have a GD of 0, and would not go through as Uruguay would have scored more goals.
BUT if France win 2-1 their record; points, GD and goals scored would be identical to Denmarks, but they would have beaten Denmark, so would come above them - unless another team also shares the exact same record - then it gets complex.
Basically, it will be one of Denmark and France, and one of Uruguay and Senegal. I tip Senegal and Denmark.
> Doesnt it also depend on what happens in the other game, since France
> are bottom, if Urguay beat beat Senegal and France beat Denmark lose
> 2-0 to France, would that not mean Senegal and Uraguy go through?
If France win 2-0 they will have goal difference of +1, and Denmark would be -1.
If Uruguay also beat Senegal 1-0 Urugauy would have GD of 0 and Senegal 0. Uruguay and France would go through, with France group winners.
If France only win 1-0 they would have the same goal difference as Denmark, but Denmark would have scored 2 goals in total, and France only 1. France would have a GD of 0, and would not go through as Uruguay would have scored more goals.
BUT if France win 2-1 their record; points, GD and goals scored would be identical to Denmarks, but they would have beaten Denmark, so would come above them - unless another team also shares the exact same record - then it gets complex.
Basically, it will be one of Denmark and France, and one of Uruguay and Senegal. I tip Senegal and Denmark.
Page: