The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
unless you live in america not many peeps have seen this but i have my mate downloaded and i watched there and it rocks.
its got gore violence and ZOMBIES
if anyone knows somthing about it or have seen it please post
its got gore violence and ZOMBIES
if anyone knows somthing about it or have seen it please post
Page:
yes yes i know res evil aint that gory, but it is still a fun film to watch but its still enough to creep you out, when your all alone with no lights
"I don't care if the zombies look crap and the blood looks like ketchup"
Actually the blood in Dawn Of The Dead looked like orange metled crayon, in the audio commentary Tom Savini (that how you spell it?) actually apologises for the blood looking so bad
Actually the blood in Dawn Of The Dead looked like orange metled crayon, in the audio commentary Tom Savini (that how you spell it?) actually apologises for the blood looking so bad
I saw Resi Evil and I thought it was entertaining, but nowhere near on a par with any of Romero's zombie films.
It had its moments, but just wasnt gory enough for a zombie film! I know the director had to cut it to receive an R rating, but it seemed a little bit too tame at the end of the day. The whole laser matrix thing that diced the black chap was about the most amusing part of the film, even though a similar thing had been done in Cube.
It was good for a film based on a game, but ultimatley quite forgettable.
It had its moments, but just wasnt gory enough for a zombie film! I know the director had to cut it to receive an R rating, but it seemed a little bit too tame at the end of the day. The whole laser matrix thing that diced the black chap was about the most amusing part of the film, even though a similar thing had been done in Cube.
It was good for a film based on a game, but ultimatley quite forgettable.
cooooldude2001 wrote:
> HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA have you even seen this movie? the zombies are so
> updated to the 21st century and most of the action isn't about them;
> there's zombie dogs, lickers and other huge weird psycho things and it's
> worth going to see.
>
> Also big things like spiderman have 100 or more million pounds to make
> it, res evil only had 35 and it woops aaass. I have to say I've seen
> spiderman and res evil and res evil is the better of the two films
I've tried my best to render the above into something even vaguely coherent so that I can reply to it. But basically I wouldn't expect anyone with the grammatical ability of a small bar of toffee to be able to understand the complexities of something as fiendishly complex and psychologically multi-layered as Spiderman, well for him anyway.
Sit in your chair and go yay BLAM zombie blood guts gore wow this is the best film ever, and be careful to wipe that line of foamy spittle off the side of your mouth. But you should realise that a zombie film, or indeed any film, is not just about what things look like. So what if there's funky looking zombies, if the film's not actually any good? You could have given Kevin Costner's "the Postman" a billion dollar budget, blown the whole lot on the best CGI ever and it would still be one of the worst films ever made, so bad that it's not even cool in a cult-bad-movies sense.
Romero's films and Raimi's are just better. I don't care if the zombies look crap and the blood looks like ketchup. The films, in my opinion, are greatly better than Resident Evil. And Resident Evil isn't a bad film. It's just not a classic. At least take the chance to watch older films otherwise you're going to be ripped off by the studios turning out substandard schlock. Instead of trying to raise the bar, they'll wait till no-one's looking and then lower it themselves and pretend to be the new standard.
There can be more to zombie films than BLAM BLAM splatter. And it's almost funny that you think having different types of zombies is what I was refering to when I originally said this. Watch the last of the Dead series. That contrasts the attitudes of the scientists, the military and the zombies themselves and asks who the real monsters are in the film. But you don't have to watch it that way as it also works on an entirely normal zombie film level. Resident Evil also didn't have anything approaching the legendary Dawn of the Dead, set in a shopping mall. This is one of my favourite films ever.
All you seem to want is eye candy films. Nothing particularly wrong with that but films can be so so much more.
> HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA have you even seen this movie? the zombies are so
> updated to the 21st century and most of the action isn't about them;
> there's zombie dogs, lickers and other huge weird psycho things and it's
> worth going to see.
>
> Also big things like spiderman have 100 or more million pounds to make
> it, res evil only had 35 and it woops aaass. I have to say I've seen
> spiderman and res evil and res evil is the better of the two films
I've tried my best to render the above into something even vaguely coherent so that I can reply to it. But basically I wouldn't expect anyone with the grammatical ability of a small bar of toffee to be able to understand the complexities of something as fiendishly complex and psychologically multi-layered as Spiderman, well for him anyway.
Sit in your chair and go yay BLAM zombie blood guts gore wow this is the best film ever, and be careful to wipe that line of foamy spittle off the side of your mouth. But you should realise that a zombie film, or indeed any film, is not just about what things look like. So what if there's funky looking zombies, if the film's not actually any good? You could have given Kevin Costner's "the Postman" a billion dollar budget, blown the whole lot on the best CGI ever and it would still be one of the worst films ever made, so bad that it's not even cool in a cult-bad-movies sense.
Romero's films and Raimi's are just better. I don't care if the zombies look crap and the blood looks like ketchup. The films, in my opinion, are greatly better than Resident Evil. And Resident Evil isn't a bad film. It's just not a classic. At least take the chance to watch older films otherwise you're going to be ripped off by the studios turning out substandard schlock. Instead of trying to raise the bar, they'll wait till no-one's looking and then lower it themselves and pretend to be the new standard.
There can be more to zombie films than BLAM BLAM splatter. And it's almost funny that you think having different types of zombies is what I was refering to when I originally said this. Watch the last of the Dead series. That contrasts the attitudes of the scientists, the military and the zombies themselves and asks who the real monsters are in the film. But you don't have to watch it that way as it also works on an entirely normal zombie film level. Resident Evil also didn't have anything approaching the legendary Dawn of the Dead, set in a shopping mall. This is one of my favourite films ever.
All you seem to want is eye candy films. Nothing particularly wrong with that but films can be so so much more.
I got it on DVD bout a month ago so I beat everyone, not gloating just saying. MUHAHAHAHa
oh yeh and
[]D()[]\[]CY
FILM BUFF
[]D()[]\[]CY
FILM BUFF
Mr. Happy wrote:
> Call me a poncy filmbuff if you want but for god's sake go and
> watch:
>
> Night of the Living Dead
> Day of the Dead
> Dawn of the Dead
>
> Evil Dead
> Evil Dead II
>
> and then you will realise that Resident Evil is merely a mediocre
> zombie film, despite all its technical hoo-ha and big name actors.
>
> Sorry guys but zombie films from the 80's kick the atrophied butt of
> Resident Evil.
HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA have you even seen this movie the zombies are so updated to the 21st century and most of the action isnt about the teres zombie dogs lickers and other huge weird pycho things and its worth going to ce
also big things like spiderman have 100 or more million pounds to make it res evil onlyhad 35 and it woops aaass i have to say ive seen spiderman aand res evil and res evil is the better of the two films
> Call me a poncy filmbuff if you want but for god's sake go and
> watch:
>
> Night of the Living Dead
> Day of the Dead
> Dawn of the Dead
>
> Evil Dead
> Evil Dead II
>
> and then you will realise that Resident Evil is merely a mediocre
> zombie film, despite all its technical hoo-ha and big name actors.
>
> Sorry guys but zombie films from the 80's kick the atrophied butt of
> Resident Evil.
HAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHA have you even seen this movie the zombies are so updated to the 21st century and most of the action isnt about the teres zombie dogs lickers and other huge weird pycho things and its worth going to ce
also big things like spiderman have 100 or more million pounds to make it res evil onlyhad 35 and it woops aaass i have to say ive seen spiderman aand res evil and res evil is the better of the two films
Mr. Happy wrote:
> Night of the Living Dead - Seen it, and the remake
> Day of the Dead - Seen it
> Dawn of the Dead - Own it on DVD
>
> Evil Dead - Own it on DVD
> Evil Dead II - Own it on DVD
Although Evil Dead 1 and 2 aren't really zombie films, they're still excellent, as are Night and Dawn. Only seen Day twice, and that was years ago. I'd probably like it more now
> Night of the Living Dead - Seen it, and the remake
> Day of the Dead - Seen it
> Dawn of the Dead - Own it on DVD
>
> Evil Dead - Own it on DVD
> Evil Dead II - Own it on DVD
Although Evil Dead 1 and 2 aren't really zombie films, they're still excellent, as are Night and Dawn. Only seen Day twice, and that was years ago. I'd probably like it more now
Mmm... Mila Jovovich...
Page: