The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Sven against the swedes. Who will win?
Is everyone watching the game tomorrow? I hope so.
It's gonna be ENGLAND! all the way, *i hope*
Is everyone watching the game tomorrow? I hope so.
It's gonna be ENGLAND! all the way, *i hope*
Page:
go fever go fever
Ant wrote:
> Lawless Fever wrote:
> Jeebus, sod off.
>
> I'd rather not, thanks.
Well then stop being so ignorant and narrow-minded. As I said, I have nothing against you, but don't try and restrict my views, it will go nowhere. You don't exactly see me trying to make you fall short on your religious views now, do we?
Shall we just kiss and make up? Well, forget the kissing part, but the latter I would favour :P
> Lawless Fever wrote:
> Jeebus, sod off.
>
> I'd rather not, thanks.
Well then stop being so ignorant and narrow-minded. As I said, I have nothing against you, but don't try and restrict my views, it will go nowhere. You don't exactly see me trying to make you fall short on your religious views now, do we?
Shall we just kiss and make up? Well, forget the kissing part, but the latter I would favour :P
Ali@specialreserve wrote:
> Just a small point Mr Fever, if you continue to swear like a small,
> ill-educated boy I won't hesitate in banning you.
Alright, fair enough. Afterwards, I did feel a little guilt-stricken about it, but I was really angry at Mills, give me the benefit of the doubt. Anyway, I also feel as though I'm ganged upon here. I have nothing against Ant, but I feel that I shouldn't be scrutinised for my personal views. It's called freedom-of-speech.
This staff member, and this restriction of my views, kinda peeves me off, to be honest. I'm sorry, but that's how I feel. Go ahead and ban me, but what would that solve? Nothing...
> Just a small point Mr Fever, if you continue to swear like a small,
> ill-educated boy I won't hesitate in banning you.
Alright, fair enough. Afterwards, I did feel a little guilt-stricken about it, but I was really angry at Mills, give me the benefit of the doubt. Anyway, I also feel as though I'm ganged upon here. I have nothing against Ant, but I feel that I shouldn't be scrutinised for my personal views. It's called freedom-of-speech.
This staff member, and this restriction of my views, kinda peeves me off, to be honest. I'm sorry, but that's how I feel. Go ahead and ban me, but what would that solve? Nothing...
Go Ali, go Ali
Ok maybe Heskey should'nt have been playing on the left and it was partly svens fault, but dropping darius would be an absolute outrage after the way he played today. and er about the 4-3-3 formation....its been tryed....did'nt work.....
Quinty wrote:
> What so just because Vassel did'nt have a shot on goal means he should
> be left out of the next match? er no
>
> he was Englands "shinign light" today, hence he was given
> the man of the match award
But should Heskey be left out because he was forced to play on the left side of the midfield? er-no.
Heskey has the experience too.
Against Nigeria maybe he should try 4-3-3...
I admit it's a tough choice, both have their cases. Heskey, when he was allowed to, played well today (that turn was one of the highlights of England's performance), and I think he tried hard on the left side. Heskey also has the experience, and when's he on scoring form, he scores a lot. And of course, Heskey and Owen are a great pair.
Vassell works hard, was very lively today and although he didn't shot it against Sweden, he's got an excellent shot on him.
It's up to Sven now...I would slip him a tenner to let Heskey play, but he already has enough of them.
And one more thing...why should Heskey be made to play on the left? Why not put the oh so wonderful Vassell there, see if he can do any better.
> What so just because Vassel did'nt have a shot on goal means he should
> be left out of the next match? er no
>
> he was Englands "shinign light" today, hence he was given
> the man of the match award
But should Heskey be left out because he was forced to play on the left side of the midfield? er-no.
Heskey has the experience too.
Against Nigeria maybe he should try 4-3-3...
I admit it's a tough choice, both have their cases. Heskey, when he was allowed to, played well today (that turn was one of the highlights of England's performance), and I think he tried hard on the left side. Heskey also has the experience, and when's he on scoring form, he scores a lot. And of course, Heskey and Owen are a great pair.
Vassell works hard, was very lively today and although he didn't shot it against Sweden, he's got an excellent shot on him.
It's up to Sven now...I would slip him a tenner to let Heskey play, but he already has enough of them.
And one more thing...why should Heskey be made to play on the left? Why not put the oh so wonderful Vassell there, see if he can do any better.
What so just because Vassel did'nt have a shot on goal means he should be left out of the next match? er no
he was Englands "shinign light" today, hence he was given the man of the match award
he was Englands "shinign light" today, hence he was given the man of the match award
Quinty wrote:
> So Ant, your saying you would rather have heskey than vassel? are you
> having a giraffe?
Nope, not at all.
Did Vassell actually have one decent shot on goal today? I know Owen and Heskey did.
And remember, Owen and Heskey play together all the time and they combine well.
Owen and Vassell just didn't 'click' today.
> So Ant, your saying you would rather have heskey than vassel? are you
> having a giraffe?
Nope, not at all.
Did Vassell actually have one decent shot on goal today? I know Owen and Heskey did.
And remember, Owen and Heskey play together all the time and they combine well.
Owen and Vassell just didn't 'click' today.
So Ant, your saying you would rather have heskey than vassel? are you having a giraffe?
Page: