Viewing Thread:
"Through sheer morbid curiosity"

Thread only for those who have come across or against me in one discussion or another on these boards.

Question;

What do you think of me?

Answers (yes, you MUST use one of these, unless you don't want to...)

a) well informed, intellectual poster, strong but realistic views
b) Good, informative poster
c) a voice among the masses, no-one "special"
d) consistent poster. poster of consistently irrelevant and boring drivel at least
e) can be good, but not often
f) troll

fire away, make me laugh.

As I said in the Copularity thing.

(I) If monkeys could talk they wouldn't talk to you.

You have to remember people wont have the same views as you, having a go at ant because he likes WWE and Panto isn't right. Think of others and not just yourself when you are on here perhaps?

(h) A Fortune Cookie

Goatboy wrote:
> (g) Egotistical

rather egotistic than statistic wouldn't you say?

(g) Egotistical

Ant wrote:
> Pantomime rules.

DEAR GOD I HOPE THERE WAS SOME SARCASM THERE!

He's behind you.

Insane Bartender wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> Of course it could be that I'm totally mad, which is the more
> plausible explanation.
>
> Entirely. You should grow out of the whole WWE thing when you hit
> puberty though. It's as bad as pantomime.

Pantomime rules.

Ant wrote:
> Of course it could be that I'm totally mad, which is the more
> plausible explanation.

Entirely. You should grow out of the whole WWE thing when you hit puberty though. It's as bad as pantomime.

Of course it could be that I'm totally mad, which is the more plausible explanation.

You post well, but as I did say in my Copularity Pontest before it got accidently deleted it seems as though you have your head up your own behind a lot of the time. Maybe I'm getting the wrong expression but you seem to think you're higher than a lot of people...

Could be wrong though. And maybe it's because I like WWE and I didn't exactly find your comment hilarious, but there you go.