The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Having written this out, I just realised I can't post it in Prime. So no doubt it will get a load of replies like: I h8 XBox, ur mum iz a bloater, or some crap like that from some spotty oik who can barely throw a sentence together.
*Sigh*
Such is life. Continuing:
- - - - - - - - - - -
XBox is the choice for me, the console best suited to my needs. How do I know this? Well, recently I have owned/still own an N64, a DC, PS2, and an XBox. The only "next gen" console I have not played is the GC, but I am assuming the games to be in a similar style to the N64.
I sold my PS2 to get my XBox, but I stil own the others. Why did I sell my PS2? Well, I found the games to be *too* realistic. Yup. Some people say that the GC games are too unrealistic, but I feel that too much realism can be bad as well.
Look at stuff like GT3 and MGS2, it all looks very nice and realistic, and "ooh! The guards can hear you!" but that realism detracts from the game, for me anyway.
The XBox sits somewhere in the middle, although possibly slightly nearer to the PS2 than to the GC.
The games are realistic, to an extent, but they don't take that realism and make it anal. Look at PGR, for example. The cities are real, but the handling is not. The handling is *slightly* arcadey which for me makes the game more fun. You can string together handbrake turns and slides into huge combos. This is far more enjoyable than GT3. IMHO.
The other major launch title for XBox was Halo. This is harldy a simulation in the same vein as something like Project IGI on the PC, but that is it's strong point.
I don't want to come back from work to sit down and play a game where I'm so relieved to finish the level that I save about 4 times to make sure it's done. Games should be about fun, not a challenge. At least, that's how I look at it.
I don't want something challenging in my game, I want games that I can play for half an hour while dinner's cooking and forget about my crappy day. I want to play with a smile on my face, not a grimace of concentration.
Xbox gives me the best games for what I want. Fun games with a realistic tinge.
But for others, there are games like Galleon (NOT coming out on PS2, interestingly...) and Morrowind that are PC style games. But on a console. Why would you want PC style games on a console? Well, if you've been sitting a PC all day at work, you don't really want to sit at a PC all evening playing games, at least, I don't want to.
XBox gives me the chance of playing PC style games in the comfort of my lounge where I can have mates round for a gaming-pizza-beer session. How many of you can get 4 people round your PC in any comfort? Exactly.
And I haven't even mentioned how much money you save without having to upgrade your PC every 18 months or so.
Or the fact that the XBox is pretty much future proof. With the built in HDD and Broadband connector. People say that the XBox is expensive, yet is the same price as the PS2 at launch, with more hardware for your money.
How much will have spent in total on their PS2 if they bought on at launch, and then have to buy memory cards and the HDD/Modem jobby as well. That's probably approaching £400. If not more.
And the GC. It's nice and cheap at launch, sure. But you'll have to buy a memory card or two, putting it up to £200. Then if you want a DVD player as well, like me, then that's another £150ish for a half decent one. Ooh, look, £350. Hmmm, maybe the XBox isn't that expensive afterall, eh?
Sod the size of the console (another hting people pick up on), it just sits under your telly, you don't have to move it very often, so what's the problem? But at least there's one good thing about the sze of it. The XBox actually looks like it's worth £300, unlike the PS2. :-D
But you may be different. You may already have a DVD player, so your motives will be different to mine. I'm just explaining (for some bizarre reason) why I chose to part with £400 of my money.
So there you go.
*Sigh*
Such is life. Continuing:
- - - - - - - - - - -
XBox is the choice for me, the console best suited to my needs. How do I know this? Well, recently I have owned/still own an N64, a DC, PS2, and an XBox. The only "next gen" console I have not played is the GC, but I am assuming the games to be in a similar style to the N64.
I sold my PS2 to get my XBox, but I stil own the others. Why did I sell my PS2? Well, I found the games to be *too* realistic. Yup. Some people say that the GC games are too unrealistic, but I feel that too much realism can be bad as well.
Look at stuff like GT3 and MGS2, it all looks very nice and realistic, and "ooh! The guards can hear you!" but that realism detracts from the game, for me anyway.
The XBox sits somewhere in the middle, although possibly slightly nearer to the PS2 than to the GC.
The games are realistic, to an extent, but they don't take that realism and make it anal. Look at PGR, for example. The cities are real, but the handling is not. The handling is *slightly* arcadey which for me makes the game more fun. You can string together handbrake turns and slides into huge combos. This is far more enjoyable than GT3. IMHO.
The other major launch title for XBox was Halo. This is harldy a simulation in the same vein as something like Project IGI on the PC, but that is it's strong point.
I don't want to come back from work to sit down and play a game where I'm so relieved to finish the level that I save about 4 times to make sure it's done. Games should be about fun, not a challenge. At least, that's how I look at it.
I don't want something challenging in my game, I want games that I can play for half an hour while dinner's cooking and forget about my crappy day. I want to play with a smile on my face, not a grimace of concentration.
Xbox gives me the best games for what I want. Fun games with a realistic tinge.
But for others, there are games like Galleon (NOT coming out on PS2, interestingly...) and Morrowind that are PC style games. But on a console. Why would you want PC style games on a console? Well, if you've been sitting a PC all day at work, you don't really want to sit at a PC all evening playing games, at least, I don't want to.
XBox gives me the chance of playing PC style games in the comfort of my lounge where I can have mates round for a gaming-pizza-beer session. How many of you can get 4 people round your PC in any comfort? Exactly.
And I haven't even mentioned how much money you save without having to upgrade your PC every 18 months or so.
Or the fact that the XBox is pretty much future proof. With the built in HDD and Broadband connector. People say that the XBox is expensive, yet is the same price as the PS2 at launch, with more hardware for your money.
How much will have spent in total on their PS2 if they bought on at launch, and then have to buy memory cards and the HDD/Modem jobby as well. That's probably approaching £400. If not more.
And the GC. It's nice and cheap at launch, sure. But you'll have to buy a memory card or two, putting it up to £200. Then if you want a DVD player as well, like me, then that's another £150ish for a half decent one. Ooh, look, £350. Hmmm, maybe the XBox isn't that expensive afterall, eh?
Sod the size of the console (another hting people pick up on), it just sits under your telly, you don't have to move it very often, so what's the problem? But at least there's one good thing about the sze of it. The XBox actually looks like it's worth £300, unlike the PS2. :-D
But you may be different. You may already have a DVD player, so your motives will be different to mine. I'm just explaining (for some bizarre reason) why I chose to part with £400 of my money.
So there you go.
Page:
Sodding Idiot - would you be Your Honour?
Although I disagree with your GC price up (For 200 you get a memory card AND the game of your choice and an Xbox quality DVD only costs around 100 quid...).
But the rest seemed pretty alright.
You like Halo and PGR which is a good reason to get one.
PGR doesn't appeal to me and while Halo is good, it's not nearly enough for me to choose it over Mario and Zelda or Smash brothers.
So I'll be choosing the Gamecube.
But the rest seemed pretty alright.
You like Halo and PGR which is a good reason to get one.
PGR doesn't appeal to me and while Halo is good, it's not nearly enough for me to choose it over Mario and Zelda or Smash brothers.
So I'll be choosing the Gamecube.
Having written this out, I just realised I can't post it in Prime. So no doubt it will get a load of replies like: I h8 XBox, ur mum iz a bloater, or some crap like that from some spotty oik who can barely throw a sentence together.
*Sigh*
Such is life. Continuing:
- - - - - - - - - - -
XBox is the choice for me, the console best suited to my needs. How do I know this? Well, recently I have owned/still own an N64, a DC, PS2, and an XBox. The only "next gen" console I have not played is the GC, but I am assuming the games to be in a similar style to the N64.
I sold my PS2 to get my XBox, but I stil own the others. Why did I sell my PS2? Well, I found the games to be *too* realistic. Yup. Some people say that the GC games are too unrealistic, but I feel that too much realism can be bad as well.
Look at stuff like GT3 and MGS2, it all looks very nice and realistic, and "ooh! The guards can hear you!" but that realism detracts from the game, for me anyway.
The XBox sits somewhere in the middle, although possibly slightly nearer to the PS2 than to the GC.
The games are realistic, to an extent, but they don't take that realism and make it anal. Look at PGR, for example. The cities are real, but the handling is not. The handling is *slightly* arcadey which for me makes the game more fun. You can string together handbrake turns and slides into huge combos. This is far more enjoyable than GT3. IMHO.
The other major launch title for XBox was Halo. This is harldy a simulation in the same vein as something like Project IGI on the PC, but that is it's strong point.
I don't want to come back from work to sit down and play a game where I'm so relieved to finish the level that I save about 4 times to make sure it's done. Games should be about fun, not a challenge. At least, that's how I look at it.
I don't want something challenging in my game, I want games that I can play for half an hour while dinner's cooking and forget about my crappy day. I want to play with a smile on my face, not a grimace of concentration.
Xbox gives me the best games for what I want. Fun games with a realistic tinge.
But for others, there are games like Galleon (NOT coming out on PS2, interestingly...) and Morrowind that are PC style games. But on a console. Why would you want PC style games on a console? Well, if you've been sitting a PC all day at work, you don't really want to sit at a PC all evening playing games, at least, I don't want to.
XBox gives me the chance of playing PC style games in the comfort of my lounge where I can have mates round for a gaming-pizza-beer session. How many of you can get 4 people round your PC in any comfort? Exactly.
And I haven't even mentioned how much money you save without having to upgrade your PC every 18 months or so.
Or the fact that the XBox is pretty much future proof. With the built in HDD and Broadband connector. People say that the XBox is expensive, yet is the same price as the PS2 at launch, with more hardware for your money.
How much will have spent in total on their PS2 if they bought on at launch, and then have to buy memory cards and the HDD/Modem jobby as well. That's probably approaching £400. If not more.
And the GC. It's nice and cheap at launch, sure. But you'll have to buy a memory card or two, putting it up to £200. Then if you want a DVD player as well, like me, then that's another £150ish for a half decent one. Ooh, look, £350. Hmmm, maybe the XBox isn't that expensive afterall, eh?
Sod the size of the console (another hting people pick up on), it just sits under your telly, you don't have to move it very often, so what's the problem? But at least there's one good thing about the sze of it. The XBox actually looks like it's worth £300, unlike the PS2. :-D
But you may be different. You may already have a DVD player, so your motives will be different to mine. I'm just explaining (for some bizarre reason) why I chose to part with £400 of my money.
So there you go.
*Sigh*
Such is life. Continuing:
- - - - - - - - - - -
XBox is the choice for me, the console best suited to my needs. How do I know this? Well, recently I have owned/still own an N64, a DC, PS2, and an XBox. The only "next gen" console I have not played is the GC, but I am assuming the games to be in a similar style to the N64.
I sold my PS2 to get my XBox, but I stil own the others. Why did I sell my PS2? Well, I found the games to be *too* realistic. Yup. Some people say that the GC games are too unrealistic, but I feel that too much realism can be bad as well.
Look at stuff like GT3 and MGS2, it all looks very nice and realistic, and "ooh! The guards can hear you!" but that realism detracts from the game, for me anyway.
The XBox sits somewhere in the middle, although possibly slightly nearer to the PS2 than to the GC.
The games are realistic, to an extent, but they don't take that realism and make it anal. Look at PGR, for example. The cities are real, but the handling is not. The handling is *slightly* arcadey which for me makes the game more fun. You can string together handbrake turns and slides into huge combos. This is far more enjoyable than GT3. IMHO.
The other major launch title for XBox was Halo. This is harldy a simulation in the same vein as something like Project IGI on the PC, but that is it's strong point.
I don't want to come back from work to sit down and play a game where I'm so relieved to finish the level that I save about 4 times to make sure it's done. Games should be about fun, not a challenge. At least, that's how I look at it.
I don't want something challenging in my game, I want games that I can play for half an hour while dinner's cooking and forget about my crappy day. I want to play with a smile on my face, not a grimace of concentration.
Xbox gives me the best games for what I want. Fun games with a realistic tinge.
But for others, there are games like Galleon (NOT coming out on PS2, interestingly...) and Morrowind that are PC style games. But on a console. Why would you want PC style games on a console? Well, if you've been sitting a PC all day at work, you don't really want to sit at a PC all evening playing games, at least, I don't want to.
XBox gives me the chance of playing PC style games in the comfort of my lounge where I can have mates round for a gaming-pizza-beer session. How many of you can get 4 people round your PC in any comfort? Exactly.
And I haven't even mentioned how much money you save without having to upgrade your PC every 18 months or so.
Or the fact that the XBox is pretty much future proof. With the built in HDD and Broadband connector. People say that the XBox is expensive, yet is the same price as the PS2 at launch, with more hardware for your money.
How much will have spent in total on their PS2 if they bought on at launch, and then have to buy memory cards and the HDD/Modem jobby as well. That's probably approaching £400. If not more.
And the GC. It's nice and cheap at launch, sure. But you'll have to buy a memory card or two, putting it up to £200. Then if you want a DVD player as well, like me, then that's another £150ish for a half decent one. Ooh, look, £350. Hmmm, maybe the XBox isn't that expensive afterall, eh?
Sod the size of the console (another hting people pick up on), it just sits under your telly, you don't have to move it very often, so what's the problem? But at least there's one good thing about the sze of it. The XBox actually looks like it's worth £300, unlike the PS2. :-D
But you may be different. You may already have a DVD player, so your motives will be different to mine. I'm just explaining (for some bizarre reason) why I chose to part with £400 of my money.
So there you go.
Page: