GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Game"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Sat 08/12/07 at 14:50
Regular
"Author of Pain"
Posts: 395
OK, so I was just in Game in Staines. I was innocently perusing the PC chart when out of the corner of my eye, some 8-10 year old kid slaps Oblivion and some other game down I didn't quite see on the counter. The bloke on the till peers down at him and asks politely "is anyone else with you?", to which the kid responds by silently pointing behind him to who I presume was his mother.

What happened next shocked me completely. Till chap says to hovering lady person "I'll need you to be at the till for the transaction, as both of these games are rated 15". Woman looks down at little 8 year old, back at till bloke and shuffles forward.

Transaction goes through. 8 year old successfully purchases 2 15 rated games and goes off to play them, mother in tow.

In ten year's time, after this kid has hacked twelve people to death with a machete before killing himself by boring parker pens into his eyes, they will blame the video games.

Not the crappy parents. Not the guy in Game who knew he was selling games to someone too young to own them, but didn't care as long as he covered his own a**e. Genius.
Tue 15/01/08 at 17:39
Regular
"@optometrytweet"
Posts: 4,686
I was playing 18 rated titles at the age of 11 over a mates hose and it hasn't warped me (at least, I dont think it has). I still believe in them ans when the manager wasn't around my ID tactic was harsh and I made sure if a parent bought it for the child I made sure that the parent was 100% sure of the content and would only accept payment if the money came directly from the parent - the kid hadn't taken part of the transaction at all.

I know videogames have changed from the days I was playing 19. GTA with it's little polygon bullets and weird looking cars, Duke Nukem and it's feeble attempt to bring sex into the next gen shooter. Compared to what is out there today they are tame.

Agreed, the internet is a decent place to get games underage. I bought several and everybody is none the wiser, some games my parents still don't know I have and I'm nearly 20.

But I now believe that the BBFC are getting lapse in their classification. Mass effect for example - moderate violence, swearing with lesbian and straight sex scenes and it only gets a 12 rating. Blue Dragon hints at quite a bit of swearing contains fantasy violence and some scary scenes and it is unclassified by the BBFC. All it gets is a PEGI 12+.

I'm for the certificates, but I think parents should be educated on what they mean as I got fed up with the number of people saying "well my son is bright, I'm sure he can figure it out" just as much as when people go "I don't want that game because it will be too easy" on a PEGI 3+ game.
Tue 15/01/08 at 15:34
Regular
"Devil in disguise"
Posts: 3,151
The problem with this debate is that people keep trying to argue with a conscious rationale about something that (if true) happens on a subconscious level. So we seem to end up with lots of pointless assertions. Being able to tell the difference between a video game and reality or saying that games arent realistic isnt really the issue.
Tue 15/01/08 at 14:41
Regular
"Hellfire Stoker"
Posts: 10,534
And jewel cases can be smashed and sharpened... :)

It's an easily influenced ueber-minority who are committing said crimes because of games; same with those Black Metal fans in Norway some years ago. It's a parent's responsibility I'd guess; would it be a bad idea to let their kids play GTA/Manhunt titles, do they know about the content? But then, there are only very few who can fail to tell the difference between real and pretend violence; as Vaz or Liebermann (Yes, politicos from both sides of the Atlantic!) don't seem to understand.

I know my dad didn't have a problem with me playing GTA2 when I was 12, as I can tell the difference between real and fake violence, and of course GTA's have become more "realistic" since. Shooting a load of polygons is a good release of anger, rage etc anyway.
Tue 15/01/08 at 14:05
Moderator
"possibly impossible"
Posts: 24,985
Let's face it, games are dangerous. All those sharp edges really hurt when someone throws one at you...
Tue 15/01/08 at 10:13
Regular
"THFC"
Posts: 4,488
I got caught speeding, tried to tell em i was playing Mario kart but they had none of it.

apparently, throwing red turtle shells at other cars is not in the highway code either?????
Tue 15/01/08 at 09:06
Regular
"Hello?"
Posts: 368
I think that if people really are going to commit such awful crimes then it surely must go deeper than the fact that they have played a violent video game or watch a particularly disturbing movie. I have been brought up around video games and having older brothers I started playing older games at a young age.

I think that the mentality of a person who will commit crimes does not do this just because they have seen it on a game. I think they could use these games as sick and twisted ideas. Video games are so popular because they are what they are, a virtual world you can immerse yourself in. You could be the best in the world at Tiger Woods on the Playstation but not able to hit a golf ball to save your life.

What I'm trying to point out is that games (at the moment) are so far from real life that to make a link between say a murder and a computer games influence is absurd. You can't blame a developer for making a 'made up game' that has someone been pinpointed as the reason the person committed the crime.

There was talk around the 9/11 plane crashes that this was inspired by the Grand Theft Auto series. This to me is just someone trying to push the issue onto an industry that has never supported such crimes. Video games are supposed to take people into a 'virtual reality'. 99.9% of people will never think of killing someone after playing a video game.

I believe that age restrictions on games are a good thing to a certain extent but to be honest if a kid really wants a game that badly, he will get it. The internet is one way. I played games that were of a restriction I shouldn't have played. I'm not out committing crimes etc. It really does boil down to the mentality of the person behind the game, not the game itself.

I even like the idea of detailing what sort of material is in the game, like VHS did, they has a column stating whether things like violence, sex were moderate or frequent. This is a great idea and could help parents out when choosing whether to let there child play a certain game.

Well that's my view on things anyways.
Mon 14/01/08 at 21:03
Regular
"@optometrytweet"
Posts: 4,686
I worked in Game and that is the way you have to do it. If you refuse the sale the parents buy it for them. If you refuse to sell the game to the parents they get violent (as I found out on several occasions as I didn't want to see little kids getting hold of GTA or Gears of War).

However, the law states that it is illegal to supply to persons under the age limit but not to someone else that is over that age that will supply it.

In the end I used discretion. Say if two teens came in and tried to buy an 18 and one was and the other clearly wasn't (the one who wasn't who instigated the sale), I wouldn't sell, even if one could prove the age. However, I left it at the parent's discretion.

BUT! If it was a parent buying the game I clearly stated that the game contained whatever it contained (carjacking, prostitution, sex, drugs, guns, beheading, gambling, poor graphics to name a few), as many parents believe that the age restriction tells the buyer how hard the game is (yes, some people ARE that stupid... somehow the certificates they judge film content with is completely different to the SAME DESIGN on a game. 99% of them won't buy it after you tell them.

I do believe in the system, but in the end it was my job on the line - told what I felt was right and then passed the responisibility nto the parents. If the parents buy it the kids will get hold of it, thats a sad fact. If you refuse to sell it one day, there is no saying they'll not be back in a few hours buying it straight from another employee/store.

I apologise if I have created the next Hannibal Lecter. But did all I could without being attacked in the style of a murder in a videogame.
Mon 14/01/08 at 19:39
Regular
Posts: 21
I love Mario Party DS!!! How about you guys?
Wed 12/12/07 at 01:49
Regular
"Previously Vampyr"
Posts: 4,618
Everpain wrote:
> In ten year's time, after this kid has hacked twelve people to
> death with a machete before killing himself by boring parker
> pens into his eyes, they will blame the video games.


If its any consolation to you, i blame hitler's mother, not the video games he was playing.
Mon 10/12/07 at 18:34
Regular
"Monochromatic"
Posts: 18,487
Grix Thraves wrote:
> This might sound a bit weird but hear me out
>
> Is there any actual evidence that a game that's rated as a age
> above the child using it can actually -damage- the child?
>
> I've always seen it as a very individual thing.. but still - is
> there any proof it's dangerous?
>
> It's easy to say 'they're there for a reason' but what's the
> reason?
>
> And yes I'm serious

If you dont distinguish between TV and games (I do because of the interactivity) then yeah, Bandura and his behaviourist mob did a huge ammount of studies on TV violence and it's influence on kids. In the short-term it did make them more violent.
Personally i think it's an individual thing but that they still shouldnt be playing those type of games, even if the effects are only short-term.
As for links to murderers etc. It'll never be proved because i think you have to be fairly damaged in the first place and no study is going to find a 100-1000 damaged children and test whether you can turn them into psychopaths. I dont think it's a stretch though to say that taking someone not fully connected to reality or morality and giving them an alternative to those things would be a bad idea.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

The coolest ISP ever!
In my opinion, the ISP is the best I have ever used. They guarantee 'first time connection - everytime', which they have never let me down on.
Continue this excellent work...
Brilliant! As usual the careful and intuitive production that Freeola puts into everything it sets out to do, I am delighted.

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre
Feedback Hide Feedback Tab

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.