The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
if you have any thing to say on Nom, if you think that it's a good thing that they do screenshot explanations instead of long baragraphs or not, or if you think thier new total test is better than the old one, or if you miss anything that they dropped from the mag, post it.
Page:
Another thing i've thought of, the competions that NOM do I usualy try and enter them but you never hear anything about who's won do you !
i bought a mg called nintendo world once. it had way more info on the 'dolphin' than NOM but it was really badly set out, there was a ton of 'Stop the press' crapola and the paper was very cruddy quality. there was a desighn your own pokemon page in the back, which was crud, and the colours they used did not go. most of the info on the dolph' was just fonts and lots of pictures in the middle of the text.
Hey NOM, not that bad (i'll stick with it anyway) but NGC is really good. The advantage they have over NOM is that they are reveiwing the import versions of Gamecube games !
Stick with NGC, that rules!
Ditch NOM though, its for babies
Ditch NOM though, its for babies
Oh well, i'll stick with NOM and NGC !!! :)
No, they just keep the same name, and unfortunately the same quality
RM18 wrote:
> I like their paragraph long reviews and patronising style
Fare enough, do you know if they have bought out a new version of this magazine for Gamecube ?
> I like their paragraph long reviews and patronising style
Fare enough, do you know if they have bought out a new version of this magazine for Gamecube ?
I like their paragraph long reviews and patronising style
Hey, I once had to pay £4.99 for this magazine called 64 magazine, it was quite good but a bit of a rip off !!! :)
sory, i meant once a few months. (no ones perfect!)
Page: