The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
hiya and welcome to who wants to be the brainy bud...are first contestent is...i don't know yet so come on....
i will ask you 5 question and if you get them right...4 or 5 right!..
then you can pick whatever you want don't ask me questions and plus these questions are tricky!
so let me test your brain...!
i will ask you 5 question and if you get them right...4 or 5 right!..
then you can pick whatever you want don't ask me questions and plus these questions are tricky!
so let me test your brain...!
Page:
The answer to Tonys is 6.32pm
I've got one.
If a clueless newbie starts a topic consisting of 97.8% pure SPAM (no weird white lumps) at 7.00 PM on a Friday when 2012 users are on the SR forums and 1256 of them withtin 5 seconds range on the topic itself. Taking into consideration the fact that the newbie has no grasp of grammer, increasing the time it takes users to understand it's rambling by 0.087 seconds per word, the average post being 3 words long.
A regular takes about 18 seconds to write a reply, 22 if it is quoted, which is 35% of the time.
An average user enjoys insults written by themselves and others for 0.97 seconds per word on each reply.
Using these facts, calculate: (taking into account most user will be eating snaks of some kind reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
What is the rate of replies recieved?
What percentage of these replies are insulting?
How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of insulting poor little newbies?
If a clueless newbie starts a topic consisting of 97.8% pure SPAM (no weird white lumps) at 7.00 PM on a Friday when 2012 users are on the SR forums and 1256 of them withtin 5 seconds range on the topic itself. Taking into consideration the fact that the newbie has no grasp of grammer, increasing the time it takes users to understand it's rambling by 0.087 seconds per word, the average post being 3 words long.
A regular takes about 18 seconds to write a reply, 22 if it is quoted, which is 35% of the time.
An average user enjoys insults written by themselves and others for 0.97 seconds per word on each reply.
Using these facts, calculate: (taking into account most user will be eating snaks of some kind reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
What is the rate of replies recieved?
What percentage of these replies are insulting?
How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of insulting poor little newbies?
Mr happy said:
>The dogs will collide at a velocity of 47.548mph, assuming the snow proximity density to be an integer of less than 5, in their dash towards the carrots. This collision will generate the necessary quadbipotic force to frictionally explode the sled's cargo of nitro-glycerine, and gib the dogs. The resulting explosion will spread the dog's remains over a range of no more than 200 metres and the two crews of men will then initiate a break-dancing competition to see who gets to cook and eat the remains with carrots
what the hell are you talking about?
>The dogs will collide at a velocity of 47.548mph, assuming the snow proximity density to be an integer of less than 5, in their dash towards the carrots. This collision will generate the necessary quadbipotic force to frictionally explode the sled's cargo of nitro-glycerine, and gib the dogs. The resulting explosion will spread the dog's remains over a range of no more than 200 metres and the two crews of men will then initiate a break-dancing competition to see who gets to cook and eat the remains with carrots
what the hell are you talking about?
becky81 wrote:
> Your ...CORRECT!!!!
> and my second is...?
Amy or lucy or chloe ?
> Your ...CORRECT!!!!
> and my second is...?
Amy or lucy or chloe ?
FinalFantasyFantel..said:
I've got one.
If a clueless newbie starts a topic consisting of 97.8% pure SPAM (no weird white lumps) at 7.00 PM on a Friday when 2012 users are on the SR forums and 1256 of them withtin 5 seconds range on the topic itself. Taking into consideration the fact that the newbie has no grasp of grammer, increasing the time it takes users to understand it's rambling by 0.087 seconds per word, the average post being 3 words long.
A regular takes about 18 seconds to write a reply, 22 if it is quoted, which is 35% of the time.
An average user enjoys insults written by themselves and others for 0.97 seconds per word on each reply.
Using these facts, calculate: (taking into account most user will be eating snaks of some kind reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
What is the rate of replies recieved?
What percentage of these replies are insulting?
How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of insulting poor little newbies?
I'M A NEWBIE!!
I've got one.
If a clueless newbie starts a topic consisting of 97.8% pure SPAM (no weird white lumps) at 7.00 PM on a Friday when 2012 users are on the SR forums and 1256 of them withtin 5 seconds range on the topic itself. Taking into consideration the fact that the newbie has no grasp of grammer, increasing the time it takes users to understand it's rambling by 0.087 seconds per word, the average post being 3 words long.
A regular takes about 18 seconds to write a reply, 22 if it is quoted, which is 35% of the time.
An average user enjoys insults written by themselves and others for 0.97 seconds per word on each reply.
Using these facts, calculate: (taking into account most user will be eating snaks of some kind reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
What is the rate of replies recieved?
What percentage of these replies are insulting?
How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of insulting poor little newbies?
I'M A NEWBIE!!
becky81 wrote:
> FinalFantasyFantel..said:
> I've got one.
>
> If a clueless newbie starts a topic consisting of 97.8% pure SPAM (no
> weird white lumps) at 7.00 PM on a Friday when 2012 users are on the
> SR forums and 1256 of them withtin 5 seconds range on the topic
> itself. Taking into consideration the fact that the newbie has no
> grasp of grammer, increasing the time it takes users to understand
> it's rambling by 0.087 seconds per word, the average post being 3
> words long.
> A regular takes about 18 seconds to write a reply, 22 if it is quoted,
> which is 35% of the time.
> An average user enjoys insults written by themselves and others for
> 0.97 seconds per word on each reply.
>
> Using these facts, calculate: (taking into account most user will be
> eating snaks of some kind reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
>
> What is the rate of replies recieved?
>
> What percentage of these replies are insulting?
>
> How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of
> insulting poor little newbies?
>
> I'M A NEWBIE!!
Duh.
Jesus Christ save us all.
> FinalFantasyFantel..said:
> I've got one.
>
> If a clueless newbie starts a topic consisting of 97.8% pure SPAM (no
> weird white lumps) at 7.00 PM on a Friday when 2012 users are on the
> SR forums and 1256 of them withtin 5 seconds range on the topic
> itself. Taking into consideration the fact that the newbie has no
> grasp of grammer, increasing the time it takes users to understand
> it's rambling by 0.087 seconds per word, the average post being 3
> words long.
> A regular takes about 18 seconds to write a reply, 22 if it is quoted,
> which is 35% of the time.
> An average user enjoys insults written by themselves and others for
> 0.97 seconds per word on each reply.
>
> Using these facts, calculate: (taking into account most user will be
> eating snaks of some kind reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
>
> What is the rate of replies recieved?
>
> What percentage of these replies are insulting?
>
> How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of
> insulting poor little newbies?
>
> I'M A NEWBIE!!
Duh.
Jesus Christ save us all.
FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> What is the rate of replies recieved?
The percentage compared to what?
It will be failrly high because everyone will make whitty insults disguised as posts.
>
> What percentage of these replies are insulting?
70% or upwards
>
> How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of
> insulting poor little newbies?
A surprisingly long time.
> What is the rate of replies recieved?
The percentage compared to what?
It will be failrly high because everyone will make whitty insults disguised as posts.
>
> What percentage of these replies are insulting?
70% or upwards
>
> How long will it take before regulars lose interest and are tired of
> insulting poor little newbies?
A surprisingly long time.
FinalFantasyFantel..said:
> reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
I think in the case of spamming newbies per annum sould easily be amended to per anum :-)
(That was rather clever I thought)
> reducing word-rate by 65% per annum)
I think in the case of spamming newbies per annum sould easily be amended to per anum :-)
(That was rather clever I thought)
Page: