The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'ratchet and clank 2'.
Ok getting bored with all the Vice City talk so I thought I'd be different and do a thread on Ratchet and Clank(Also released on Friday if you hadn't noticed).
Anyone else got it? Whaddya think?
(No spoilers please!)
Anyone else got it? Whaddya think?
(No spoilers please!)
Page:
grand theft ali wrote:
> its well good whoever dislikes ti is a moron
Good to know there is such a thing as a non biased forum member still.
> its well good whoever dislikes ti is a moron
Good to know there is such a thing as a non biased forum member still.
its well good whoever dislikes ti is a moron
WòókieeMøn§†€® wrote:
> Okay, it's not considered a major review source, but check out the
> 8-page review on BBC1 Ceefax, page 536.
The guy who write the reviews is called Dave Gibbon, i think that says it all really :D
Though I have to say for a game i'd never heard of, the footage i've seen of it does look very good.
> Okay, it's not considered a major review source, but check out the
> 8-page review on BBC1 Ceefax, page 536.
The guy who write the reviews is called Dave Gibbon, i think that says it all really :D
Though I have to say for a game i'd never heard of, the footage i've seen of it does look very good.
Wahey! There we go! Its not the only thing I`ve read that suggests it either :D I guess it comes down to whether or not a reviewer is willing to go up against Mario. If they rate other games more highly, and people disagree completely, they could lose a lot of credibility, but there are some who are willing to take the risk. (In that I don`t include Edge who seem to spend most of their time thinking out how to use their next set of "shock tactics").
ssxpro wrote:
> Several multi-format reviewers have rated Ratchet and Clank as being
> better than Mario.
Okay, it's not considered a major review source, but check out the 8-page review on BBC1 Ceefax, page 536.
It ends:
"Ratchet & Clank is an amazingly large game for a platformer.
It will take even a serious gamer a good while to get through this - but they will have a brilliant time whil they are doing it.
While Mario Sunshine may be considered a classic, Ratchet & Clank offers an even better experience. Superb gameplay and awesome graphics make this an absolute must."
> Several multi-format reviewers have rated Ratchet and Clank as being
> better than Mario.
Okay, it's not considered a major review source, but check out the 8-page review on BBC1 Ceefax, page 536.
It ends:
"Ratchet & Clank is an amazingly large game for a platformer.
It will take even a serious gamer a good while to get through this - but they will have a brilliant time whil they are doing it.
While Mario Sunshine may be considered a classic, Ratchet & Clank offers an even better experience. Superb gameplay and awesome graphics make this an absolute must."
Blank wrote:
> Does anyone else think that the chap runs really slowly?
Hey! I'm the only posh kid around here!
:)
> Does anyone else think that the chap runs really slowly?
Hey! I'm the only posh kid around here!
:)
I played the demo and immediately disliked it. I couldn't really tell you why. Does anyone else think that the chap runs really slowly?
Several multi-format reviewers have rated Ratchet and Clank as being better than Mario. After all, Mario is much more like Jak and Daxter with its simpler moves and story. Besides, do you wanna watch a silly old man with a moustache run around being a plum, or a cool robot and his new alien friend?
Starlight wrote:
> Mario
Indeed. R.I.P.
> Mario
Indeed. R.I.P.
Sounds like brilliant game - Not sure what to get next week - Ratchet + Clank or Smackdown SYM
Page: