Viewing Thread:
"Staffies please read"

i have found out that it was a user named toricollis or toricolllis who posted the immature and offensive threads. I was torticollis. similar, but not the same. I think it was a mistake for you to ban me as it was toricolllis who offended everyone.

AfroJoe wrote:
> I wouldn't have thought toricollis would've been a name that new users
> could use, because it is 'Similar to a name already in use'.
>
> :-)

Yeah, someone wouldn't be able to create a "toricollis" because it is too close to that of (apparently) yours. So someone is lying.........

no. I can prove this. this was sent by an SR staffie. Ill give you his email to prove it, and here are the details of the post.

It was posted by toricolllis on account 55974286
It was posted on 2002-11-16 22:48:30, it has 348 words

that was written by [email protected] about ten minutes ago.

I think its possible toricullis was just DWs spelling mistake. Unless you can prove his existance in any other way?

I wouldn't have thought toricollis would've been a name that new users could use, because it is 'Similar to a name already in use'.

:-)

well i was torticollis, apparently this dude called toricollis and the like posted some really offensive stuff. My user name torticollis was banned wrongly.

Umm... yeah.

i have found out that it was a user named toricollis or toricolllis who posted the immature and offensive threads. I was torticollis. similar, but not the same. I think it was a mistake for you to ban me as it was toricolllis who offended everyone.