The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I think that the order is Xbox,gamecube and then ps2 because the xbox games r excellent such as halo and dead or alive 3 then the gamecube because they have been in the gaming buisness longer and know wot games r gud then ps2 cos all i think the only good games r gta3 and vice city and the wwe games and i think it not been in gaming as long as nintendo and ps2 is mainly 4 the dvd player
Page:
Azul˛°°˛ wrote:
> Nah, I don't have a GC, and yes, I know where you're gonna send
> me.......
http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/ [SPACE] display_messages.php?threadid=59967&forumid=132
Heh heh :D.
> Nah, I don't have a GC, and yes, I know where you're gonna send
> me.......
http://ukchatforums.reserve.co.uk/ [SPACE] display_messages.php?threadid=59967&forumid=132
Heh heh :D.
faster master blaster wrote:
> sorry i do not like nintendo i mean they got half of there ideas of
> sega and you call that exellent well if you ask me its cheating and
> they nicked segas main charecter and if i might say my fave sonic nuff
> said
1. Nintendo were around before SEGA
2. Nintendo make a bigger, better, and more varied selection of games than SEGA.
3. SEGA came to Nintendo out of their own choice.
> sorry i do not like nintendo i mean they got half of there ideas of
> sega and you call that exellent well if you ask me its cheating and
> they nicked segas main charecter and if i might say my fave sonic nuff
> said
1. Nintendo were around before SEGA
2. Nintendo make a bigger, better, and more varied selection of games than SEGA.
3. SEGA came to Nintendo out of their own choice.
Update2.01 wrote:
> Having a DVD player built in as very tempting for people who don't
> have a dvd player. Also handy when the PS2 is to be used in a
> different room from a standalone DVD.
That's true, but nowadays, DVD players are replacing video recorders, and coming as an essential with PC's - making a DVD console add-on useless. Plus, DVD players push up the price of consoles, as the PS2's isn't very good anyway - in fact, it's quite appaling.
> Well, if you already have a PS2, there's little point in switching
> then. And Nintendo will need some users to switch to bring there
> numbers up. Anyway, If I didnt have any Next Gen console, why should I
> buy a GC instead of PS2? GC has the same games which look just like
> PS2 originals, and some games come out on PS2 before GC. PS2 has more
> games, and it's got exclusives like GTA-VC.
PS2 ports? They're called multi-format games, mate. I could just as well call games on the PS2, GameCube ports but I won't, because it's not a very good argument. And 'same games that look like PS2 originals'? I'd like to see a game on the PS2 to rival the originality of any of Nintendo's games. Yes, the PS2 has more games but most of them are really rather poor and though the GTA series is good, Vice City is basically just what GTA3 should have been - making it a waste of money to buy both.
> But normally have upped graphics etc.
> Normally, the port games look identical or very close to the original
> PS2 version. So close that most people cant see the difference.
> A hard disc is not very big or heavy. And, PS2 has an internal bay for
> hard disc and BB adpator. Point being, the bay for it is already
> there, so how come PS2 is that much smaller than XBox? No, it's the
> dated tech, and the fact that the dated tech has to be ramped up to
> make it compete with the other consoles which makes it big.
Whatever.. the GameCube still manages to be more powerful than the PS2, even in it's smaller size.
> Having a DVD player built in as very tempting for people who don't
> have a dvd player. Also handy when the PS2 is to be used in a
> different room from a standalone DVD.
That's true, but nowadays, DVD players are replacing video recorders, and coming as an essential with PC's - making a DVD console add-on useless. Plus, DVD players push up the price of consoles, as the PS2's isn't very good anyway - in fact, it's quite appaling.
> Well, if you already have a PS2, there's little point in switching
> then. And Nintendo will need some users to switch to bring there
> numbers up. Anyway, If I didnt have any Next Gen console, why should I
> buy a GC instead of PS2? GC has the same games which look just like
> PS2 originals, and some games come out on PS2 before GC. PS2 has more
> games, and it's got exclusives like GTA-VC.
PS2 ports? They're called multi-format games, mate. I could just as well call games on the PS2, GameCube ports but I won't, because it's not a very good argument. And 'same games that look like PS2 originals'? I'd like to see a game on the PS2 to rival the originality of any of Nintendo's games. Yes, the PS2 has more games but most of them are really rather poor and though the GTA series is good, Vice City is basically just what GTA3 should have been - making it a waste of money to buy both.
> But normally have upped graphics etc.
> Normally, the port games look identical or very close to the original
> PS2 version. So close that most people cant see the difference.
> A hard disc is not very big or heavy. And, PS2 has an internal bay for
> hard disc and BB adpator. Point being, the bay for it is already
> there, so how come PS2 is that much smaller than XBox? No, it's the
> dated tech, and the fact that the dated tech has to be ramped up to
> make it compete with the other consoles which makes it big.
Whatever.. the GameCube still manages to be more powerful than the PS2, even in it's smaller size.
pumba wrote:
> y dont u understand the txt language
We all do, but using it makes you look like an inbred cretin.
> y dont u understand the txt language
We all do, but using it makes you look like an inbred cretin.
pumba wrote:
> y dont u understand the txt language
I do, but some people can be rather picky on this site. Don't worry about it - there's no rules to say you can't.
> y dont u understand the txt language
I do, but some people can be rather picky on this site. Don't worry about it - there's no rules to say you can't.
Update2.01 wrote:
> maddmun wrote:
> Update2.01 wrote:
> A few good games, but lots of PS2 ports.
> Therefore you can get most of your PS2 games on a GC along with the
> best GC exclusives.
> Well, if you already have a PS2, there's little point in switching
> then. And Nintendo will need some users to switch to bring there
> numbers up. Anyway, If I didnt have any Next Gen console, why should I
> buy a GC instead of PS2? GC has the same games which look just like
> PS2 originals, and some games come out on PS2 before GC. PS2 has more
> games, and it's got exclusives like GTA-VC.
Whereas the GC gets exclusives such as Metroid, Mario, Zelda and Starfox,
and of course Mario Kart
> But normally have upped graphics etc.
> Normally, the port games look identical or very close to the original
> PS2 version. So close that most people cant see the difference.
Timesplitters 2, looks much better on GC
> The console is big,
> Because of the hard Drive
> A hard disc is not very big or heavy. And, PS2 has an internal bay for
> hard disc and BB adpator. Point being, the bay for it is already
> there, so how come PS2 is that much smaller than XBox? No, it's the
> dated tech, and the fact that the dated tech has to be ramped up to
> make it compete with the other consoles which makes it big.
But, but, erm... the X-box is better!
> and the handset is not very nice to use.
> It's not THAT bad, and they are releasing a new SMALLER controller.
> Saw this, but still not as good as PS2 or GC.
I thought it was neraly as good as the GC controller (BEST IN THE WORLD)
> maddmun wrote:
> Update2.01 wrote:
> A few good games, but lots of PS2 ports.
> Therefore you can get most of your PS2 games on a GC along with the
> best GC exclusives.
> Well, if you already have a PS2, there's little point in switching
> then. And Nintendo will need some users to switch to bring there
> numbers up. Anyway, If I didnt have any Next Gen console, why should I
> buy a GC instead of PS2? GC has the same games which look just like
> PS2 originals, and some games come out on PS2 before GC. PS2 has more
> games, and it's got exclusives like GTA-VC.
Whereas the GC gets exclusives such as Metroid, Mario, Zelda and Starfox,
and of course Mario Kart
> But normally have upped graphics etc.
> Normally, the port games look identical or very close to the original
> PS2 version. So close that most people cant see the difference.
Timesplitters 2, looks much better on GC
> The console is big,
> Because of the hard Drive
> A hard disc is not very big or heavy. And, PS2 has an internal bay for
> hard disc and BB adpator. Point being, the bay for it is already
> there, so how come PS2 is that much smaller than XBox? No, it's the
> dated tech, and the fact that the dated tech has to be ramped up to
> make it compete with the other consoles which makes it big.
But, but, erm... the X-box is better!
> and the handset is not very nice to use.
> It's not THAT bad, and they are releasing a new SMALLER controller.
> Saw this, but still not as good as PS2 or GC.
I thought it was neraly as good as the GC controller (BEST IN THE WORLD)
Maverick42 wrote:
> Indeed it did - I worked on it for a while. Have you got a GameCube?
> Because if not, you know where I'm gonna tell you to go.. :D
Nah, I don't have a GC, and yes, I know where you're gonna send me.......
> Indeed it did - I worked on it for a while. Have you got a GameCube?
> Because if not, you know where I'm gonna tell you to go.. :D
Nah, I don't have a GC, and yes, I know where you're gonna send me.......
yeah
faster master blaster wrote:
> sorry i do not like nintendo i mean they got half of there ideas of
> sega and you call that exellent well if you ask me its cheating and
> they nicked segas main charecter and if i might say my fave sonic nuff
> said
What do you mean, they nicked Sonic. It was Sega who wanted Nintendo to have Sonic because Sega are not making another console. They're only in the games market now and produce games for other consoles.
> sorry i do not like nintendo i mean they got half of there ideas of
> sega and you call that exellent well if you ask me its cheating and
> they nicked segas main charecter and if i might say my fave sonic nuff
> said
What do you mean, they nicked Sonic. It was Sega who wanted Nintendo to have Sonic because Sega are not making another console. They're only in the games market now and produce games for other consoles.
sorry i do not like nintendo i mean they got half of there ideas of sega and you call that exellent well if you ask me its cheating and they nicked segas main charecter and if i might say my fave sonic nuff said
Page: