The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
UPDATE---UPDATE---UPDATE---UPDATE
Ahem. We've decided to extend this competition until the end of December to give more people a chance to join up and become popular. Also, if this wasn't made clear in the original post, the winner will only get his/her prize when they become a regular.
Cheers
Ali
UPDATE---UPDATE---UPDATE---UPDATE
The winner will be chosen by the great Snuggly himself, no less.
To compete you have to be a Newbie. The competition can only be won by a genuine newbie joining the forums AFTER today 4 pm on November 21st.
Newbies can enter by proposing themselves on this thread.
They MUST be seconded (on this thread) by at least TWO regulars, staff or notables. Just say "I second [name] for this GAD" or similar.
The more support shown on this thread, the more likely they are to win.
Their overall performance on the forums also counts.
The WINNER will be the BEST NEWBIE as judged by Mr Snuggly on December 13th.
OKAY, go for it (Oh, you're not here yet are you).
Tell yer mates.
Ahem. We've decided to extend this competition until the end of December to give more people a chance to join up and become popular. Also, if this wasn't made clear in the original post, the winner will only get his/her prize when they become a regular.
Cheers
Ali
UPDATE---UPDATE---UPDATE---UPDATE
The winner will be chosen by the great Snuggly himself, no less.
To compete you have to be a Newbie. The competition can only be won by a genuine newbie joining the forums AFTER today 4 pm on November 21st.
Newbies can enter by proposing themselves on this thread.
They MUST be seconded (on this thread) by at least TWO regulars, staff or notables. Just say "I second [name] for this GAD" or similar.
The more support shown on this thread, the more likely they are to win.
Their overall performance on the forums also counts.
The WINNER will be the BEST NEWBIE as judged by Mr Snuggly on December 13th.
OKAY, go for it (Oh, you're not here yet are you).
Tell yer mates.
Page:
I wonder why no one has hardly second me.
Hmm....
Hmm....
Of course... you could just stop posting completely until the competition ends.
*evil smirk*
*evil smirk*
If i turn reg Before the competition ends, am i disqualified? if i am.. this is Retarded! :)
Drunk Cow wrote:
> Oh, did I say PychoticKiller!! Some wierd demon must have made me do
> it. :x
yeah, you can never trust them demons..
> Oh, did I say PychoticKiller!! Some wierd demon must have made me do
> it. :x
yeah, you can never trust them demons..
PsychoticKiller wrote:
> Drunk Cow wrote:
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
>
> R-E-S-P-E-C-T! THAT IS WHAT I GET!
Oh, did I say PychoticKiller!! Some wierd demon must have made me do it. :x
> Drunk Cow wrote:
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
>
> R-E-S-P-E-C-T! THAT IS WHAT I GET!
Oh, did I say PychoticKiller!! Some wierd demon must have made me do it. :x
Drunk Cow wrote:
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
R-E-S-P-E-C-T! THAT IS WHAT I GET!
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
R-E-S-P-E-C-T! THAT IS WHAT I GET!
Smerc wrote:
> Drunk Cow wrote:
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
>
>
> I would second him to but I cant.
Well, when you become a regular on the Tenth second him. At least according to your stats. Just remember that the contest ends on the 13!!!
> Drunk Cow wrote:
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
>
>
> I would second him to but I cant.
Well, when you become a regular on the Tenth second him. At least according to your stats. Just remember that the contest ends on the 13!!!
Drunk Cow wrote:
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
I would second him to but I cant.
> I second PcychoticKiller for this GAD!!!:0
I would second him to but I cant.
†HÊ_MÅÐMÃÑ wrote:
> Smerc wrote:
> †HÊ_MÅÐMÃÑ wrote:
> i second smerc
>
>
> Thanks Madman.
>
> no, thank you
Why thank me?
> Smerc wrote:
> †HÊ_MÅÐMÃÑ wrote:
> i second smerc
>
>
> Thanks Madman.
>
> no, thank you
Why thank me?
Page: