The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I was walking through sainsburys yesterday, and my eyes fixed on the march issue of NGC. I hadn't got it yet, so I went and bought it. In the car i was reding the review of SA2B, when i turned the page to see a BIG fat 70% at the bottom!! 70%!! I couldn't believe it! I feel that it is so underrated. I would have at least given it 85+. Any views on the review?
Page:
Edgy, SA1 was FARRRR bigger than SA2! Even if you didn't like some of the characters, Sonic and Tail's levels alone were about 5 times longer than the whole of SA2, and were MUCH faster!
Sa2 is not a little on the short side- it takes 2 days!
As for the extra GC features, I doubt that they'll enlarge the game at all!
Sonic
Sa2 is not a little on the short side- it takes 2 days!
As for the extra GC features, I doubt that they'll enlarge the game at all!
Sonic
I'd say the two S.A games are just as good as each other.
*waits for sonicrav to shout at him so takes out gun*
*waits for sonicrav to shout at him so takes out gun*
Both the sonic games are just as fun as eachother. I have pre-ordered SA2:battle (GC) and have completed SA 1. They are apparantly great and are both a joy to play.
I just read the cube europe review of SA2:battle. They gave it 9.5 out of 10. There seem to be mixed opinions on sonic. I just don't know which way to turn...help....
Page: