Viewing Thread:
"Chris Jericho as WWF champion"

Chris Jericho's title reign is a joke.I have watched most of
his title defence matches so far,in most of them there's
either outside interference or Jericho cheats.I have only
seen one or two matches where,s he's won without interference or cheating.Those matches were a triple threat
on RAW and against Maven on SMACKDOWN.

This is WWF 3rd Millenium, It' their job to destroy good potential like Y2J. I feel so left out I have never seen an iron man match :(

Ant wrote:
> MikeAll wrote:
> Triple H is good but he's not great.

Ah, but surely he's
> a better wrestler overall than The Rock?

He may not be a fantastic, amazing
> wrestler or promo-cutter, but he certainly knows the game (no pun intended).

I see HHH and the Rock at the same level. Top class entertainers. The best matches in recent WWF history are Rock VS HHH. They are good enough to be put in a iron man match- Only the best are put in that: ROCK HHH HBK BRET!! (Not Jericho:)

MikeAll wrote:
> Triple H is good but he's not great.

Ah, but surely he's a better wrestler overall than The Rock?

He may not be a fantastic, amazing wrestler or promo-cutter, but he certainly knows the game (no pun intended).

Triple H is good but he's not great.

Ice Blaster wrote:
> It''s official- Jericho Sucks and The Rock rules:

'-- The WWF has modifyed
> their official WrestleMania.com matches page by pushing down the Chris Jericho
> vs. Triple H match, and listing The Rock vs. Hollywood Hulk Hogan match as the
> top match listed. Take this for what it's worth, but rumors were circulating
> before as Rock/Hogan topping off this year's WrestleMania pay-per view.

I expected to that to happen anyway, because Hogan is a classic star, bigger than Jericho, Rock, or HHH.

The reason for it is because it's the match everyone's been waiting for, the two biggest egos against each-other.

Are you insinuating that HHH sucks too?

Ice Blaster wrote:
> †hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> Erm, you'll be
> disapointed to hear the Big Show has six years (!) of his
> contract left to
> run...

Which doesn't mean a thing you will be pleased to know!!

----

Well, thank god to that! :-)

†hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> Erm, you'll be disapointed to hear the Big Show has six years (!) of his
> contract left to run...

Which doesn't mean a thing you will be pleased to know!!

†hë_Çøñg_Mðñ wrote:
> Scott Giles wrote:
> When does the Cong Man's run out.....god he is getting
> on a bit :D Release him i
> say.

I agree

---

I'll second that.

Scott Giles wrote:
> When does the Cong Man's run out.....god he is getting on a bit :D Release him i
> say.

I agree

When does the Cong Man's run out.....god he is getting on a bit :D Release him i say.