The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I'd certainly love to have a player the calibre of Van Nistelrooy playing for Spurs, but I think we're a few years away from attracting such fantastic players to North London.
He's an Arsenal fan who loves Henry, and reckons he's better just cuz he's scored more in the league and can score some from long range.
But surely, strikers are meant to get in the box at the right time, like Ruud does?? And are meant to leave the business around the middle of the field to the midfielders!?
What do you think?? Is my 'friend' correct in saying that Henry's 'much better', just becase he scores and plays differently??
They're are both 2 different top-strikers, and are both 2 different players! You never see Henry in the box asmuch do you!
Remember when Henry first came to Arsenal? His finishing was worse than Andy Cole.
Give Van Nistelrooy another season before he is judged properly. 30 Goals by February isnt bad though...
> Remember when Henry first came to
> Arsenal? His finishing was worse than Andy Cole.
Ah, but Henry had always played as a winger prior to coming to Arsenal. It's Arsene Wenger who has turned him into the striker he is.
Van Man has always been a striker.
Henry only started playing as a Winger for Juventus. Before that he always played up front. He only played on the wing for Juve becasue he coudldnt get a place up front.
As for Van Nistelrooy, He started his career as a Midfielder.
And Henry played as a striker at his first club Monaco, when United showed a strong interest in him.