The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
SSBM is a great game as we all know, but depends heavily on multiplayer.
And Eternal Darkness is a stunner of a game, but with no multiplayer.
Ive got 2 controllers and might be gettin one more this month.
So what do ye guys recon, SSBM or ED?
Amos.
> SSBM: It has an amazing multiplayer and a surprisingly large single
> player with 3 game modes to complete with all 25 characters. It has
> almost 30 "battelfields" to play on and almost 300 trophies
> to collect. The multi player has a lot of diffrent modes aswell as a
> tournament. The only thing is that this game can get repetetive and
> boring after a while.
>
> ED: I don't own this game but It looks good except it is a little bit
> to easy.
EEEEXXXXCCCCUUUUSSEEE ME! It is not all easy too be quite frank, it has 3 different settings with their own set of difficulty parameters. It doesn't just state HARD MODE, MEDIUM MODE, and EASY MODE; it makes it more of a lucky guess choice.
ED: I don't own this game but It looks good except it is a little bit to easy.
It is an adventure game since you can see your person moving around the screen, instead of through his/her eyes in a FPS.
> but is super smash bros worth it if i only have 2 controllers (if i
> didnt get the third)?
Naa! You can have either a 1 on 1 battle or a 2 on 2 battle with either a copmuter attacker on your side or your friend.
I have both and they are well worth buying, and if you want you can buy SSBM with Mario Party 4 and get 2 (yes 2) wavebird controllers free at TOYS'R'US ;
I saw it today at break (at work experience, not school) in the SUN.