The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
The latest sales figures do not read good for the Nintendo Gamecube at all.
GC sold 10,000
Xbox sold 21,000
and PS2 sold a staggering 95,000 3 times as may as the other two put together.
Pretty poor reading if you are an Xbox owner, but far worst for Ninty fanboys.
Less than half the amount of Xbox, why is the GC doing so poorly well thats is obvious to everyone except hardened Ninty fanboys.
No dvd people would rather pay a little extra for that function.
GC packages are actually no cheaper than the Xbox or PS2.
Rubbish games line-up that prove the gamer has moved on from
games like Mario. Dont take my word for it look at the figures, Starfox was hardly a resounding success either.
Games are taking far too long to produce (I thought the GC was a sinch to program for), people sick of waiting.
Xbox and PS2 get all the really big titles because they have the bigger, better and industry standard format .
GC sold 10,000
Xbox sold 21,000
and PS2 sold a staggering 95,000 3 times as may as the other two put together.
Pretty poor reading if you are an Xbox owner, but far worst for Ninty fanboys.
Less than half the amount of Xbox, why is the GC doing so poorly well thats is obvious to everyone except hardened Ninty fanboys.
No dvd people would rather pay a little extra for that function.
GC packages are actually no cheaper than the Xbox or PS2.
Rubbish games line-up that prove the gamer has moved on from
games like Mario. Dont take my word for it look at the figures, Starfox was hardly a resounding success either.
Games are taking far too long to produce (I thought the GC was a sinch to program for), people sick of waiting.
Xbox and PS2 get all the really big titles because they have the bigger, better and industry standard format .
Page:
Top score wrote:
> That was last year then.
Given that I've stated dozens of times on this site and also my special observe profile also clearly states that I am 23 years old, I can only assume that your inexperience causes you to have a gaping ignorance of basic mathematics...
> That was last year then.
Given that I've stated dozens of times on this site and also my special observe profile also clearly states that I am 23 years old, I can only assume that your inexperience causes you to have a gaping ignorance of basic mathematics...
Insane Bartender wrote:
> I was 4.
That was last year then.
> I was 4.
That was last year then.
Miserableman wrote:
> Your point would be valid were Top Score not 11.
And how old were you before you kissed a girl?
I was 4.
> Your point would be valid were Top Score not 11.
And how old were you before you kissed a girl?
I was 4.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> I won't blame you for being a virgin. No-one is to blame really. But
> the sooner you get out there, pucker up and kiss the girls, the sooner
> you'll get over yourself, and realise that you're a complete buffoon.
Your point would be valid were Top Score not 11.
> I won't blame you for being a virgin. No-one is to blame really. But
> the sooner you get out there, pucker up and kiss the girls, the sooner
> you'll get over yourself, and realise that you're a complete buffoon.
Your point would be valid were Top Score not 11.
Update2.01 wrote:
> Stop it, shut up about "essex girls". Very offensive - my
> Sister lives there - and she's nothing like that!
Its a well known fact. Why do think Goaty lives down there? ;-)
> Stop it, shut up about "essex girls". Very offensive - my
> Sister lives there - and she's nothing like that!
Its a well known fact. Why do think Goaty lives down there? ;-)
Update2.01 wrote:
> Stop it, shut up about "essex girls". Very offensive
How is it offensive? Sexual promiscuity is lauded as almost heroic in men, so why should it be different for women? The only offensive thing here is your sexist comment.
> Stop it, shut up about "essex girls". Very offensive
How is it offensive? Sexual promiscuity is lauded as almost heroic in men, so why should it be different for women? The only offensive thing here is your sexist comment.
Top score wrote:
> That's because even they have standards.
I will now sit back and chuckle to myself, wondering if you have ever even kissed a girl before in your life, other than your mum and other relations.
I greatly suspect that the answer is no.
But that's OK. Not everyone hits their stride and learns how to attract women straight away. It's one of those things that seems to have been kept out of "human instict", and also something that government education doesn't teach.
I won't blame you for being a virgin. No-one is to blame really. But the sooner you get out there, pucker up and kiss the girls, the sooner you'll get over yourself, and realise that you're a complete buffoon.
> That's because even they have standards.
I will now sit back and chuckle to myself, wondering if you have ever even kissed a girl before in your life, other than your mum and other relations.
I greatly suspect that the answer is no.
But that's OK. Not everyone hits their stride and learns how to attract women straight away. It's one of those things that seems to have been kept out of "human instict", and also something that government education doesn't teach.
I won't blame you for being a virgin. No-one is to blame really. But the sooner you get out there, pucker up and kiss the girls, the sooner you'll get over yourself, and realise that you're a complete buffoon.
Stop it, shut up about "essex girls". Very offensive - my Sister lives there - and she's nothing like that!
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Actually, I have never slept with anyone from essex
That's because even they have standards.
> Actually, I have never slept with anyone from essex
That's because even they have standards.
Actually, I have never slept with anyone from essex, which is still a better record than you Cherry, having never slept with anyone at all...
Page: