The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
1. We might consider booting the odd Notable off the Notable list. But I'm not sure if it would be by democratic vote, as that would be very catty. A bit like Big Brother.
2. We might consider an interim status between the current range and banned. I favour "learner" for the status tag and pink for the name colour to warn of danger. We could call them "pinkies".
Changes would appear to be necessary to improve the written content.
2. We might consider an interim status between the current range and banned. I favour "learner" for the status tag and pink for the name colour to warn of danger. We could call them "pinkies".
Changes would appear to be necessary to improve the written content.
Page:
Doughnut Monster wrote:
> I forgot!
>
> or orange!
Maybe grey, a really pathetic shade of grey. That'd show them
> I forgot!
>
> or orange!
Maybe grey, a really pathetic shade of grey. That'd show them
I admit I like the idea of having a set number of notables. That would stop the notables taking their status for granted and working hard to keep the place. Perhaps notable elections could take place more frequently too, say every 2 months.
There would be the election for people voting someone to be notable and the election of who shouldnt be a notable any more.
There would be the election for people voting someone to be notable and the election of who shouldnt be a notable any more.
Kyz22 wrote:
> Doughnut Monster wrote:
> I like it to!
>
> what about if somebody's close to getting banned but ain't quite
> there
> you could make their name RED or something like that!
>
> JATs are red. Maybe maroon?
I forgot!
or orange!
> Doughnut Monster wrote:
> I like it to!
>
> what about if somebody's close to getting banned but ain't quite
> there
> you could make their name RED or something like that!
>
> JATs are red. Maybe maroon?
I forgot!
or orange!
Doughnut Monster wrote:
> I like it to!
>
> what about if somebody's close to getting banned but ain't quite there
> you could make their name RED or something like that!
JATs are red. Maybe maroon?
> I like it to!
>
> what about if somebody's close to getting banned but ain't quite there
> you could make their name RED or something like that!
JATs are red. Maybe maroon?
Be a lot less tolerant with trolls. Starting using the royal foot a lot more ruthlessly. These boards have stupidly high numbers of people who post first, think never.
I like it to!
what about if somebody's close to getting banned but ain't quite there you could make their name RED or something like that!
what about if somebody's close to getting banned but ain't quite there you could make their name RED or something like that!
Turning the notables on each other, great idea.
In a few months martial law will be declared as the forums plunge into a state of emercengy.
In a few months martial law will be declared as the forums plunge into a state of emercengy.
Well you could always have a set number of Notables, one steps up as one is pushed down. But if so then make the elections more frequent, then more people can have a chance at being Notable.
AliBoy wrote:
> Cool, you should make it that the notables get to vote on the other
> notables to boot out. Controversial. I like it.
Good idea
> Cool, you should make it that the notables get to vote on the other
> notables to boot out. Controversial. I like it.
Good idea
"namelink-staffplonker">Tony
Sounds good to me!
:-D
Sounds good to me!
:-D
Page: