The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
As Doughnuts monster self appointed campaigne manager i reckon that voting for doughnuts is the best person you could choose.
I reckon he would make a good notable because of his constant good posts and the fact that whatever he writes even if it's pure spam he can make me laugh.
Also he has a zero tolarance policiy with the J.A.T's and the newbies. If someone annoy's him he will go out of his way to get them back.
So if you want to vote for one of the newer regulars go ahead but you will be missing out on a man who is funny yet serious in his own sense.
Call me a butt licker if you like, but i couldn't care less.
VOTE DOUGHNUT MONSTER.
I reckon he would make a good notable because of his constant good posts and the fact that whatever he writes even if it's pure spam he can make me laugh.
Also he has a zero tolarance policiy with the J.A.T's and the newbies. If someone annoy's him he will go out of his way to get them back.
So if you want to vote for one of the newer regulars go ahead but you will be missing out on a man who is funny yet serious in his own sense.
Call me a butt licker if you like, but i couldn't care less.
VOTE DOUGHNUT MONSTER.
Page:
Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> Small Frog wrote:
> Isn't genetalia spelt genitalia?
Most probably but
> the song I had spelt it like this.
I blame them
Bout time I changed that
> tag anyway me thinks
I see I got your motor working again!
> Small Frog wrote:
> Isn't genetalia spelt genitalia?
Most probably but
> the song I had spelt it like this.
I blame them
Bout time I changed that
> tag anyway me thinks
I see I got your motor working again!
Small Frog wrote:
> Isn't genetalia spelt genitalia?
Most probably but the song I had spelt it like this.
I blame them
Bout time I changed that tag anyway me thinks
> Isn't genetalia spelt genitalia?
Most probably but the song I had spelt it like this.
I blame them
Bout time I changed that tag anyway me thinks
Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> Doughnut Monster wrote:
Is your motor stuck hampsta?
*Inserts 10p to get it
> working again*
It'll cost you more than that
*Inserts 50P and a chocolate filled doughnut.
"Hey this damn thing won't give me my 10P change.
I was going to get a mini doughnut wiv that"
> Doughnut Monster wrote:
Is your motor stuck hampsta?
*Inserts 10p to get it
> working again*
It'll cost you more than that
*Inserts 50P and a chocolate filled doughnut.
"Hey this damn thing won't give me my 10P change.
I was going to get a mini doughnut wiv that"
Isn't genetalia spelt genitalia?
Doughnut Monster wrote:
Is your motor stuck hampsta?
*Inserts 10p to get it working again*
It'll cost you more than that
Is your motor stuck hampsta?
*Inserts 10p to get it working again*
It'll cost you more than that
Jimmy Duck wrote:
> Look mate, i've gone through being a newbie and that just the way that they are
> treated. As you say some aren't but it is just the way. It is cruell, but going
> around saying it shouldn't happen is just a waste of time.
You're talking rubbish and you know it. The only way it won't happen is if idiots like you grow up and start acting responsibly. I can argue, since I seem to be a lot more vocal and have a substantially larger vocabulary than some regulars, but some younger newbies might be put off, because of the way they were treated by biased fools such as yourself.
Hey, it could happen...
> Look mate, i've gone through being a newbie and that just the way that they are
> treated. As you say some aren't but it is just the way. It is cruell, but going
> around saying it shouldn't happen is just a waste of time.
You're talking rubbish and you know it. The only way it won't happen is if idiots like you grow up and start acting responsibly. I can argue, since I seem to be a lot more vocal and have a substantially larger vocabulary than some regulars, but some younger newbies might be put off, because of the way they were treated by biased fools such as yourself.
Hey, it could happen...
Gangsta Hamsta wrote:
> Doughnut Monster wrote:
I'd probabaly
> get banned after snuggly gives me a
> spanking with his ten foot stick.
Hur hur hur
Is your motor stuck hampsta?
*Inserts 10p to get it working again*
> Doughnut Monster wrote:
I'd probabaly
> get banned after snuggly gives me a
> spanking with his ten foot stick.
Hur hur hur
Is your motor stuck hampsta?
*Inserts 10p to get it working again*
Doughnut Monster wrote:
I'd probabaly
> get banned after snuggly gives me a spanking with his ten foot stick.
Hur hur hur
I'd probabaly
> get banned after snuggly gives me a spanking with his ten foot stick.
Hur hur hur
Look mate, i've gone through being a newbie and that just the way that they are treated. As you say some aren't but it is just the way. It is cruell, but going around saying it shouldn't happen is just a waste of time.
Jimmy Duck wrote:
> Small Frog wrote:
> You see, that's just the sort of attitude that you don't
> need on the forums. I
> hadn't spoken to Mr Monster before yesterday, and I
> had no idea he was 'kind' to
> JATs and Newbies. Therefore, I was simply
> making my opinion that Newbies should
> be treated fairly known to
> everyone.
So back off, you fool.
Who you calling a fool boy, Many newbies
> and JATs deserve what they get.
Some yes but not many.
Some are spammers and will always be that way.
For others that want to be honest posters and not to be a spammer they should be given the chance to prove themselves.
Just because of their title it doesn't meant that they should be treated any differently from regulars or Notables.
Think of it this way.
If I were to call a Notable a spammer or start treating them like a newbie then they'd be pretty peeved and I'd probabaly get banned after snuggly gives me a spanking with his ten foot stick.
It works the same way for newbies.
They'd feel exactly the same way as a Notable would when picked on.
> Small Frog wrote:
> You see, that's just the sort of attitude that you don't
> need on the forums. I
> hadn't spoken to Mr Monster before yesterday, and I
> had no idea he was 'kind' to
> JATs and Newbies. Therefore, I was simply
> making my opinion that Newbies should
> be treated fairly known to
> everyone.
So back off, you fool.
Who you calling a fool boy, Many newbies
> and JATs deserve what they get.
Some yes but not many.
Some are spammers and will always be that way.
For others that want to be honest posters and not to be a spammer they should be given the chance to prove themselves.
Just because of their title it doesn't meant that they should be treated any differently from regulars or Notables.
Think of it this way.
If I were to call a Notable a spammer or start treating them like a newbie then they'd be pretty peeved and I'd probabaly get banned after snuggly gives me a spanking with his ten foot stick.
It works the same way for newbies.
They'd feel exactly the same way as a Notable would when picked on.
Page: