GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Problems with header - looks rubbish after upload"

The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Wed 16/05/12 at 18:10
Regular
Posts: 7
Hi,

I changed my header image recently and have since had a problem with it looking completely rubbish. I have always uploaded PNG files as I've found the colour saturation and contrast is retained when it is often lost in jpegs and other file types. Now, however, even this isn't the case. I left it for a while to see if it had anything to do with the image needing to be moderated/approved but it's just the same...a bland version of what it should be.

All images upload and show faithfully elsewhere in the body content of the site.

Some particulars in case it matters:

1. I prefer to upload png files
2. I use Firefox for a browser on a macbook
3. I don't upload a logo on top of the header image.

Any help/fix would be much appreciated....

cheers
Wed 16/05/12 at 18:10
Regular
Posts: 7
Hi,

I changed my header image recently and have since had a problem with it looking completely rubbish. I have always uploaded PNG files as I've found the colour saturation and contrast is retained when it is often lost in jpegs and other file types. Now, however, even this isn't the case. I left it for a while to see if it had anything to do with the image needing to be moderated/approved but it's just the same...a bland version of what it should be.

All images upload and show faithfully elsewhere in the body content of the site.

Some particulars in case it matters:

1. I prefer to upload png files
2. I use Firefox for a browser on a macbook
3. I don't upload a logo on top of the header image.

Any help/fix would be much appreciated....

cheers
Wed 16/05/12 at 20:04
Regular
"Feather edged ..."
Posts: 8,536
Hi wondercloak and welcome to the Forums.

A URL would be helpful, to be able to see the problem that you describe :¬) and is this Instant Pro we are dealing with? Are you image size settings correct in your code?
Wed 16/05/12 at 22:38
Regular
Posts: 7
Hi.

Thanks for the reply. My website is:

http://www.conservationphotojournalism.com/

It's an instant pro site.

And yes, the image is 702 pixels in width, as specified on the upload screen in the instructions.

You can see the difference in clarity between the header and the images below (all PNGs too).

Looking forward to some superior knowledge pointing me in the right direction to address this.

Thanks
Thu 17/05/12 at 09:17
Moderator
"Are you sure?"
Posts: 5,000
Hi - nice website!

I can only guess that InstantPro is perhaps compressing your header image. The InstantPro header is 'special' as users have reported issues with animated GIFs in the past so it does behave differently than the main page body.

Compare the image file size (right hand click in browser) of the website version to your original to see it it's been reduced.

If that's happening perhaps a staffie will be able to say if there's a way round that.

[s]Hmmm...[/s] My Freeola InstantPro Site
Thu 17/05/12 at 11:08
Staff Moderator
"Aargh! Broken..."
Posts: 1,408
Hello wondercloak,

Could you please try uploading your banner image again for me and let me know whether the result is any better?
Thu 17/05/12 at 19:32
Regular
Posts: 7
Thanks Eccles and Hmmm...


I have checked the size and it's the same - 702 pixels wide on both the uploaded image and the header in the browser.

I have re-uploaded it and it's the same unfortunately. I tried it as GIF but it looks EVEN worse.
Thu 17/05/12 at 20:06
Regular
"Devil in disguise"
Posts: 3,151
It might be worthwhile uploading the original image elsewhere so we can have a look.

One thing I do notice though, all of your images have embedded colour profiles and the header image doesnt. Eccles will be able to answer this properly, but I wonder if the header is undergoing something server side thats stripping the colour profile.
Thu 17/05/12 at 20:10
Moderator
"Are you sure?"
Posts: 5,000
Hi.
Rather than the physical dimensions it's the actual file size that's worth checking - kbs rather than pixels.

But from Eccles reply it does sound as if some image processing is going on.


[s]Hmmm...[/s]


Edit - I'm writing this on my phone which has taken so long I missed Garin's reply...
Thu 17/05/12 at 23:01
Regular
Posts: 7
Hi - thanks for all your help so far.

As per Dr Garin's suggestion, for you to compare the two images I have placed the file in the body text of a page here....

www.conservationphotojournalism.com/guides

And Hmmm.. yes the file size is smaller. Sorry for misreading your suggestion first-time around.

The original file size is 236kb and it's coming up at 158.07kb off the site.

Cheers
Thu 17/05/12 at 23:52
Regular
"Devil in disguise"
Posts: 3,151
The one embedded in the guides page still has its colour profile, I dont think thats specifically the problem though.

The images seem to be identical, just different palettes. Something happening server side obviously. I'm sure Eccles will fix it!

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

Great services and friendly support
I have been a subscriber to your service for more than 9 yrs. I have got at least 12 other people to sign up to Freeola. This is due to the great services offered and the responsive friendly support.
Continue this excellent work...
Brilliant! As usual the careful and intuitive production that Freeola puts into everything it sets out to do, I am delighted.

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre
Feedback Close Feedback

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.