The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Gamecube - Nintendo have always been at the forefront of pad design, with notable milestones being the introduction of analogue stick (N64) and shoulder buttons (SNES). The Gamecube designer seems to be no different. The analogue stick is perfectly placed, and the positioning of the butons seems perfect for all shaped hands. It just feels right, and the built in rumble pack and superb shoulder triggers only add to the comfort.
Playstation 2 - It seems Sony have taken heed opf the old adage 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'. Little has changed from the PSone pad apart from analogue sensitive buttons, but the lack of games that have taken advantage of it means it is essentially the same pad. Saying that, it is still quite good.
XBox - What a shocker. Unless you have giant hands the controller seems to bulky, and unlike the Gamecube pad which seems like an extension of your hand you constantly have to wrestle with this pad, and the moulded D-pad and close, tiny buttons don't help. Microsoft's inexperience in the console industry definitely shows.
It seems only Nintendo have a real commitment to improvement and quality, and unlike PS2 who seem content to tweak their existing controller, Nintendo have really pushed the boat out in terms of design and comfort, and in my opinion have the best next-gen pad. But as the N64 showed controller excellence doesn't necessarily = huge sales.
What do you think is the best?
all of your effort into the game making it hard and not fun. you sub-consiosly
enjoy the game which you controll the best, most.
This means that the ps2 controller, people are alredy familier with so that is fine. The gamecube controller is, a better controller than both the xbox and ps2, but it is new so it needs time to settle in. lasly the xbox, badly made and new so, is is awful.
> Legendary Link wrote:
> The buying public (people who have never bourght a
> consol befor) probably are.
In that case, why have so many people bought the
> PS2, which looks like an expensive skiffle board?
maybe cause they don't know what a skiffle board is, and maybe cause its the only next gen consol on the market.
> The buying public (people who have never bourght a consol befor) probably are.
In that case, why have so many people bought the PS2, which looks like an expensive skiffle board?
> Yes, that is what I'm like.
I respect your opinion, but I disagree. I don't know maybe I'm in the minority.
On an interesting note, who buys a console on the basis of looks, or how much does it influence your decision?