The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Anyone got jurassic park 3 yet? I know it doesnt lay a scratch on the original but its still an ok film.
I got it in a DVD special set. It had the DVD, 2 story board lobby cards, a picture of a raptor, a movie cell (mine is part of the fight between T-rex and the spineosorous or whatever its called) and a cetificate of authenticity signed by two producers from the movie. Not bad for £19.99.
I got it in a DVD special set. It had the DVD, 2 story board lobby cards, a picture of a raptor, a movie cell (mine is part of the fight between T-rex and the spineosorous or whatever its called) and a cetificate of authenticity signed by two producers from the movie. Not bad for £19.99.
Page:
It's just Vottanator and his ill-founded beliefs..
Stryke wrote:
I just view JP3 as a
> superior film, IMHO, which is a better IMHo than yours.
----------
What?
I just view JP3 as a
> superior film, IMHO, which is a better IMHo than yours.
----------
What?
Mystique wrote:
> CDouch wrote:
> WH Smiths
I got mine from the Newbury store, they only
> had 2 so you might
> find it hard to get hold of.
Is it a Smiths
> exclusive? Is there like a 'special edition' sticker on it? how will i know its
> a special edition!?
Its in a cardboard box with 3 scratch marks down it. It has the JP3 logo and says something like Special edition box set. I only saw it in Smiths so it could be an exclusive. Have a look on their web site.
> CDouch wrote:
> WH Smiths
I got mine from the Newbury store, they only
> had 2 so you might
> find it hard to get hold of.
Is it a Smiths
> exclusive? Is there like a 'special edition' sticker on it? how will i know its
> a special edition!?
Its in a cardboard box with 3 scratch marks down it. It has the JP3 logo and says something like Special edition box set. I only saw it in Smiths so it could be an exclusive. Have a look on their web site.
The_Vottanator wrote:
> There is no way JP3 is as good as the original. I know you have a serious
> problem with Spielberg, Gaz. So I suppose I can understand you saying that. :-D
--
Bah, fool. It's got nothing to do with how much I hate Spielburg, although he is still crap ;-)
I just view JP3 as a superior film, IMHO, which is a better IMHo than yours.
> There is no way JP3 is as good as the original. I know you have a serious
> problem with Spielberg, Gaz. So I suppose I can understand you saying that. :-D
--
Bah, fool. It's got nothing to do with how much I hate Spielburg, although he is still crap ;-)
I just view JP3 as a superior film, IMHO, which is a better IMHo than yours.
The_Vottanator wrote:
> There is no way JP3 is as good as the original. I know you have a serious
> problem with Spielberg, Gaz. So I suppose I can understand you saying that. :-D
>
The original had much more of a storyline and was, and still is, a BRILLIANT
> film. The second WAS dire. I don't care if it was Spielberg, it was still dire.
> The 3rd wasn't bad. Not great but not as bad as the second.
---------------
I only saw #2 when it was ITV recently, how bad is that? Heh! We had it on video about 3 times and I never once sat down to watch it!
But I quite liked it
VERY different to the book, which I'd read prior
But then the book's plot was almost identical to the first one, right down to "oh, what a coincidence, the kid is a genius on a computer, oh no, he has to save them all by typing" ending
Glad they got rid of that!
> There is no way JP3 is as good as the original. I know you have a serious
> problem with Spielberg, Gaz. So I suppose I can understand you saying that. :-D
>
The original had much more of a storyline and was, and still is, a BRILLIANT
> film. The second WAS dire. I don't care if it was Spielberg, it was still dire.
> The 3rd wasn't bad. Not great but not as bad as the second.
---------------
I only saw #2 when it was ITV recently, how bad is that? Heh! We had it on video about 3 times and I never once sat down to watch it!
But I quite liked it
VERY different to the book, which I'd read prior
But then the book's plot was almost identical to the first one, right down to "oh, what a coincidence, the kid is a genius on a computer, oh no, he has to save them all by typing" ending
Glad they got rid of that!
CDouch wrote:
> WH Smiths
I got mine from the Newbury store, they only had 2 so you might
> find it hard to get hold of.
Is it a Smiths exclusive? Is there like a 'special edition' sticker on it? how will i know its a special edition!?
> WH Smiths
I got mine from the Newbury store, they only had 2 so you might
> find it hard to get hold of.
Is it a Smiths exclusive? Is there like a 'special edition' sticker on it? how will i know its a special edition!?
Although all of that was just my opinion lar de da de da. :-D
There is no way JP3 is as good as the original. I know you have a serious problem with Spielberg, Gaz. So I suppose I can understand you saying that. :-D
The original had much more of a storyline and was, and still is, a BRILLIANT film. The second WAS dire. I don't care if it was Spielberg, it was still dire. The 3rd wasn't bad. Not great but not as bad as the second.
The original had much more of a storyline and was, and still is, a BRILLIANT film. The second WAS dire. I don't care if it was Spielberg, it was still dire. The 3rd wasn't bad. Not great but not as bad as the second.
Got Jurassic Park III earlier but havent had chance to watch it yet - Will do later though!! Looks pretty good!!
*hopes for a GAD with JP3 review*
Page: