The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
what was the worst present you got for x-mas?
mine was a pair of cost hangers, just 2 of them. they were flowery. and another thing i got them from a person who my mum spent 20quid ech on there 5 childen, i mean they must feel so quilty now.
mine was a pair of cost hangers, just 2 of them. they were flowery. and another thing i got them from a person who my mum spent 20quid ech on there 5 childen, i mean they must feel so quilty now.
Page:
DW wrote:
> ReDdY²°°2 wrote:
> My worst present? Hmmm. Socks.
>
> Sure it wasn't that Leicester Shítty, sorry, City shirt?
:-D
> ReDdY²°°2 wrote:
> My worst present? Hmmm. Socks.
>
> Sure it wasn't that Leicester Shítty, sorry, City shirt?
:-D
WS wrote:
> When I got Tribunal form GAME I thought they had forgotten to put the
> disc in, turns out they wrap it in with the instruction manual in the
> plastic wallet type thing.
They do that with all games now. They just pull the lot out in a sealed packet and put it in the case.
> When I got Tribunal form GAME I thought they had forgotten to put the
> disc in, turns out they wrap it in with the instruction manual in the
> plastic wallet type thing.
They do that with all games now. They just pull the lot out in a sealed packet and put it in the case.
When I got Tribunal form GAME I thought they had forgotten to put the disc in, turns out they wrap it in with the instruction manual in the plastic wallet type thing.
ReDdY2°°2 wrote:
> My worst present? Hmmm. Socks.
Sure it wasn't that Leicester City shirt?
> My worst present? Hmmm. Socks.
Sure it wasn't that Leicester City shirt?
Mystique wrote:
> Was it sealed?
> If not...why didn't whoever buy it for you check the box?
> Always.Check.The.Box.
---
Yeah, it was sealed, which made the whole thing more baffling.
That's why I never checked the box when I first got it - just decided to wait until today...
Nintendo's fault then.
*Goes off to moan at some Nintendo person*
> Was it sealed?
> If not...why didn't whoever buy it for you check the box?
> Always.Check.The.Box.
---
Yeah, it was sealed, which made the whole thing more baffling.
That's why I never checked the box when I first got it - just decided to wait until today...
Nintendo's fault then.
*Goes off to moan at some Nintendo person*
I once got a paper rack. I melted it.
My worst present? Hmmm. Socks.
Drunk Cow wrote:
> J-42 wrote:
>
>
> See.
>
> *waves tounge in air*
>
> Making out with the air again I see.:-D
Yep, and it's sooo good. mmmm...
Plus, it's closer to a woman than you'll ever get!
:D
> J-42 wrote:
>
>
> See.
>
> *waves tounge in air*
>
> Making out with the air again I see.:-D
Yep, and it's sooo good. mmmm...
Plus, it's closer to a woman than you'll ever get!
:D
> It's also a lot more
> respectable for a relative to give vouchers instead of a load of
> cash.
Whoever thought up that piece of morality and ethics or whatever it is should be kicked repeatedly in the mean bean machine.
> Surely it's better than nothing?
Obviously.
> respectable for a relative to give vouchers instead of a load of
> cash.
Whoever thought up that piece of morality and ethics or whatever it is should be kicked repeatedly in the mean bean machine.
> Surely it's better than nothing?
Obviously.
Tóm wrote:
>
> Surely it's better than nothing?
surely nothing is better than coat hangers?
>
> Surely it's better than nothing?
surely nothing is better than coat hangers?
Page: