The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Grand Theft Auto: Vice City'.
My friend just got his PS2 for Christmas, a bit late I know. The only game he’s got is Vice City, and we were having an argument about whether GTA III is better than Vice City. He has only played Vice for a few hours, but he says it is “way better” than GTA III. I would have to disagree, I don’t own Vice City, but I’ve played it for a long time around one of my other friend’s house.
To me GTA III was a landmark in the games industry, not many people will disagree with me here. Driver was the first game to be 3D in a sense that you could go wherever you wanted on the game. That’s not very clear, but if you’ve played the game you should know what I mean. Now, GTA III took this to new limits. It added what the previous titles in the series had, and added a huge more. It allowed you to explore every inch of the Liberty City and the other islands. I used to perch up on Louis Sex Club, snipe a few people then hide from the helicopters behind the advertising boards.
To me, Vice City is a poor “improvement” on number three, to me it hasn’t improved. It is meant to be a different game, hence the different area and time period, but you have to admit it contains all the main features of GTA III, which to be fair any sequel does. But it still doesn’t contain any drastic changes that make it a new game. Yes, it isn’t GTA IIII, which is why some people say it is only a kind of add-on. But it has taken a few years for this title to come along, which is usually how long it takes for a new release to be made. And seeing as I think the game is very similar to number three, they could have somehow “copy and pasted” a lot of the previous game into the new one.
I do love to play around on the motorbikes, but this does get a bit boring after a while. I also went on a killing spree on Vice City, which lasted for around 30 minutes. Now I could only stay away from the cops for around 15 minutes on GTA III, that’s without stealing a tank. Now I went into a shop, fair enough. But the glass was bullet proof, and I was in a pharmacy. Now crime may have been high then, but bullet proof glass in a high street shop, that’s going a bit too far I think. So, not only was I pretty safe, but I forgot to block of the entrance with a car. But, no need to. The police didn’t come into the shop until I had 5 stars. Now it can’t take the highest level of computer AI to make the cops come into a shop now can it?
I played a few missions on Vice City, and they have improved somewhat on GTA III’s missions. But they weren’t revolutionary, which I didn’t expect, but I was expecting more than what I they were. After all, this game was so hyped up. Even I was looking forward to what I thought would be GTA IIII back in the day. But when I heard that the next game in the series was going “back in time”, I did worry. I had played GTA: London, after playing GTA for a while. And London was absolutely pants. There were no fast cars, and the main game hadn’t changed at all. It even looked the same. Now if you’re going to make a new game, it has to improve on its predecessor. And this is why I think Vice City is, to some extent, like GTA: London.
Now I don’t own Vice City, so I can’t make a major viewing of the game. But during my time playing the game, I made a few views of the game. It was good, but not that good. It was nowhere near as good as what it should have been. GTA III was such a large base for Rockstar to build on; but in the end the game just wasn’t my cup of tee.
So, I prefer GTA III to Vice City by a long way, but which do you prefer? This has been said a lot before, but can you give your reasons, I will be looking forward to reading them :D
Thanks for reading,
Benny Bish.
To me GTA III was a landmark in the games industry, not many people will disagree with me here. Driver was the first game to be 3D in a sense that you could go wherever you wanted on the game. That’s not very clear, but if you’ve played the game you should know what I mean. Now, GTA III took this to new limits. It added what the previous titles in the series had, and added a huge more. It allowed you to explore every inch of the Liberty City and the other islands. I used to perch up on Louis Sex Club, snipe a few people then hide from the helicopters behind the advertising boards.
To me, Vice City is a poor “improvement” on number three, to me it hasn’t improved. It is meant to be a different game, hence the different area and time period, but you have to admit it contains all the main features of GTA III, which to be fair any sequel does. But it still doesn’t contain any drastic changes that make it a new game. Yes, it isn’t GTA IIII, which is why some people say it is only a kind of add-on. But it has taken a few years for this title to come along, which is usually how long it takes for a new release to be made. And seeing as I think the game is very similar to number three, they could have somehow “copy and pasted” a lot of the previous game into the new one.
I do love to play around on the motorbikes, but this does get a bit boring after a while. I also went on a killing spree on Vice City, which lasted for around 30 minutes. Now I could only stay away from the cops for around 15 minutes on GTA III, that’s without stealing a tank. Now I went into a shop, fair enough. But the glass was bullet proof, and I was in a pharmacy. Now crime may have been high then, but bullet proof glass in a high street shop, that’s going a bit too far I think. So, not only was I pretty safe, but I forgot to block of the entrance with a car. But, no need to. The police didn’t come into the shop until I had 5 stars. Now it can’t take the highest level of computer AI to make the cops come into a shop now can it?
I played a few missions on Vice City, and they have improved somewhat on GTA III’s missions. But they weren’t revolutionary, which I didn’t expect, but I was expecting more than what I they were. After all, this game was so hyped up. Even I was looking forward to what I thought would be GTA IIII back in the day. But when I heard that the next game in the series was going “back in time”, I did worry. I had played GTA: London, after playing GTA for a while. And London was absolutely pants. There were no fast cars, and the main game hadn’t changed at all. It even looked the same. Now if you’re going to make a new game, it has to improve on its predecessor. And this is why I think Vice City is, to some extent, like GTA: London.
Now I don’t own Vice City, so I can’t make a major viewing of the game. But during my time playing the game, I made a few views of the game. It was good, but not that good. It was nowhere near as good as what it should have been. GTA III was such a large base for Rockstar to build on; but in the end the game just wasn’t my cup of tee.
So, I prefer GTA III to Vice City by a long way, but which do you prefer? This has been said a lot before, but can you give your reasons, I will be looking forward to reading them :D
Thanks for reading,
Benny Bish.
Page:
have you seen the weapons in vice they are awful they are all machine guns and a pistol and sniper rifle no rocket launcher hoqw rubbish is that
My friend just got his PS2 for Christmas, a bit late I know. The only game he’s got is Vice City, and we were having an argument about whether GTA III is better than Vice City. He has only played Vice for a few hours, but he says it is “way better” than GTA III. I would have to disagree, I don’t own Vice City, but I’ve played it for a long time around one of my other friend’s house.
To me GTA III was a landmark in the games industry, not many people will disagree with me here. Driver was the first game to be 3D in a sense that you could go wherever you wanted on the game. That’s not very clear, but if you’ve played the game you should know what I mean. Now, GTA III took this to new limits. It added what the previous titles in the series had, and added a huge more. It allowed you to explore every inch of the Liberty City and the other islands. I used to perch up on Louis Sex Club, snipe a few people then hide from the helicopters behind the advertising boards.
To me, Vice City is a poor “improvement” on number three, to me it hasn’t improved. It is meant to be a different game, hence the different area and time period, but you have to admit it contains all the main features of GTA III, which to be fair any sequel does. But it still doesn’t contain any drastic changes that make it a new game. Yes, it isn’t GTA IIII, which is why some people say it is only a kind of add-on. But it has taken a few years for this title to come along, which is usually how long it takes for a new release to be made. And seeing as I think the game is very similar to number three, they could have somehow “copy and pasted” a lot of the previous game into the new one.
I do love to play around on the motorbikes, but this does get a bit boring after a while. I also went on a killing spree on Vice City, which lasted for around 30 minutes. Now I could only stay away from the cops for around 15 minutes on GTA III, that’s without stealing a tank. Now I went into a shop, fair enough. But the glass was bullet proof, and I was in a pharmacy. Now crime may have been high then, but bullet proof glass in a high street shop, that’s going a bit too far I think. So, not only was I pretty safe, but I forgot to block of the entrance with a car. But, no need to. The police didn’t come into the shop until I had 5 stars. Now it can’t take the highest level of computer AI to make the cops come into a shop now can it?
I played a few missions on Vice City, and they have improved somewhat on GTA III’s missions. But they weren’t revolutionary, which I didn’t expect, but I was expecting more than what I they were. After all, this game was so hyped up. Even I was looking forward to what I thought would be GTA IIII back in the day. But when I heard that the next game in the series was going “back in time”, I did worry. I had played GTA: London, after playing GTA for a while. And London was absolutely pants. There were no fast cars, and the main game hadn’t changed at all. It even looked the same. Now if you’re going to make a new game, it has to improve on its predecessor. And this is why I think Vice City is, to some extent, like GTA: London.
Now I don’t own Vice City, so I can’t make a major viewing of the game. But during my time playing the game, I made a few views of the game. It was good, but not that good. It was nowhere near as good as what it should have been. GTA III was such a large base for Rockstar to build on; but in the end the game just wasn’t my cup of tee.
So, I prefer GTA III to Vice City by a long way, but which do you prefer? This has been said a lot before, but can you give your reasons, I will be looking forward to reading them :D
Thanks for reading,
Benny Bish.
To me GTA III was a landmark in the games industry, not many people will disagree with me here. Driver was the first game to be 3D in a sense that you could go wherever you wanted on the game. That’s not very clear, but if you’ve played the game you should know what I mean. Now, GTA III took this to new limits. It added what the previous titles in the series had, and added a huge more. It allowed you to explore every inch of the Liberty City and the other islands. I used to perch up on Louis Sex Club, snipe a few people then hide from the helicopters behind the advertising boards.
To me, Vice City is a poor “improvement” on number three, to me it hasn’t improved. It is meant to be a different game, hence the different area and time period, but you have to admit it contains all the main features of GTA III, which to be fair any sequel does. But it still doesn’t contain any drastic changes that make it a new game. Yes, it isn’t GTA IIII, which is why some people say it is only a kind of add-on. But it has taken a few years for this title to come along, which is usually how long it takes for a new release to be made. And seeing as I think the game is very similar to number three, they could have somehow “copy and pasted” a lot of the previous game into the new one.
I do love to play around on the motorbikes, but this does get a bit boring after a while. I also went on a killing spree on Vice City, which lasted for around 30 minutes. Now I could only stay away from the cops for around 15 minutes on GTA III, that’s without stealing a tank. Now I went into a shop, fair enough. But the glass was bullet proof, and I was in a pharmacy. Now crime may have been high then, but bullet proof glass in a high street shop, that’s going a bit too far I think. So, not only was I pretty safe, but I forgot to block of the entrance with a car. But, no need to. The police didn’t come into the shop until I had 5 stars. Now it can’t take the highest level of computer AI to make the cops come into a shop now can it?
I played a few missions on Vice City, and they have improved somewhat on GTA III’s missions. But they weren’t revolutionary, which I didn’t expect, but I was expecting more than what I they were. After all, this game was so hyped up. Even I was looking forward to what I thought would be GTA IIII back in the day. But when I heard that the next game in the series was going “back in time”, I did worry. I had played GTA: London, after playing GTA for a while. And London was absolutely pants. There were no fast cars, and the main game hadn’t changed at all. It even looked the same. Now if you’re going to make a new game, it has to improve on its predecessor. And this is why I think Vice City is, to some extent, like GTA: London.
Now I don’t own Vice City, so I can’t make a major viewing of the game. But during my time playing the game, I made a few views of the game. It was good, but not that good. It was nowhere near as good as what it should have been. GTA III was such a large base for Rockstar to build on; but in the end the game just wasn’t my cup of tee.
So, I prefer GTA III to Vice City by a long way, but which do you prefer? This has been said a lot before, but can you give your reasons, I will be looking forward to reading them :D
Thanks for reading,
Benny Bish.
Page: