The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
...
Page:
Flux wrote:
> I'm not annoyed, in fact, I find it funny itself that you are trying
> to laugh at getting people annoyed on an internet chat site. Try it in
> real life some time - much better.
Yes trouty you will find it especially funny when they punch you in the face
> I'm not annoyed, in fact, I find it funny itself that you are trying
> to laugh at getting people annoyed on an internet chat site. Try it in
> real life some time - much better.
Yes trouty you will find it especially funny when they punch you in the face
I'm not annoyed, in fact, I find it funny itself that you are trying to laugh at getting people annoyed on an internet chat site. Try it in real life some time - much better.
Flux wrote:
> Not your fault though.
>
> Heh, tad hypocriical? Getting off on irritating the people of these
> forums.
I find it amusing to annoy uptight idiots like yourself.
You just keep stoking the fire with your pathetic replys and i'll keep laughing at you.
> Not your fault though.
>
> Heh, tad hypocriical? Getting off on irritating the people of these
> forums.
I find it amusing to annoy uptight idiots like yourself.
You just keep stoking the fire with your pathetic replys and i'll keep laughing at you.
ARRRGGGGHHHH!!!!!
why does it keep doing this to me i don't want so many posts!!!!!!!
why does it keep doing this to me i don't want so many posts!!!!!!!
Whitestripes wrote:
> Emma Watson
>
> *runs*
I think running was a good idea, but she does have *potential*
:-) didn't another certain someone say that????
> Emma Watson
>
> *runs*
I think running was a good idea, but she does have *potential*
:-) didn't another certain someone say that????
Whitestripes wrote:
> Emma Watson
>
> *runs*
I think running was a good idea, but she does have *potential*
:-) didn't another certain someone say that????
> Emma Watson
>
> *runs*
I think running was a good idea, but she does have *potential*
:-) didn't another certain someone say that????
Tromatic Trout wrote:
> Flux wrote:
> No, you're not gonna get 'abnned', you're going to get banned,
> idiot.
>
> No need to throw a hissy fit child.
I am no mere child, but a :::teenager:::, a much worse form of child :)
>
> Shouldn't you be busy celebrating your 1000 posts?
Been there, done that, bought that T-Shirt, used it as a rag and thrown it out.
>
> Some people get excited over the smallest things, you must have a very
> empty, meaningless life.
>
> Not your fault though.
Heh, tad hypocriical? Getting off on irritating the people of these forums.
Not your fault though.
> Flux wrote:
> No, you're not gonna get 'abnned', you're going to get banned,
> idiot.
>
> No need to throw a hissy fit child.
I am no mere child, but a :::teenager:::, a much worse form of child :)
>
> Shouldn't you be busy celebrating your 1000 posts?
Been there, done that, bought that T-Shirt, used it as a rag and thrown it out.
>
> Some people get excited over the smallest things, you must have a very
> empty, meaningless life.
>
> Not your fault though.
Heh, tad hypocriical? Getting off on irritating the people of these forums.
Not your fault though.
Memorandum wrote:
> well if we are i'm petty sure its *SOUL* mates, learn to spell in
> future
Correct my spelling, is that really the best you can do?
I'm not even gonna bother waisting my time arguing with you 2.
It's not even fun, lighten up guys.
Jeeeeebus
> well if we are i'm petty sure its *SOUL* mates, learn to spell in
> future
Correct my spelling, is that really the best you can do?
I'm not even gonna bother waisting my time arguing with you 2.
It's not even fun, lighten up guys.
Jeeeeebus
Jade Goody (Was that her name?)
Emma Watson
*runs*
*runs*
Page: