The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
These type of things are always going on in America and Japan, but even special reserve haven’t really done a serious one for a while, and as I am guessing most of you haven’t met in person b4 and claim to be brilliant games players how about a final tournament, staff Vs Notable's who are the best gamers!
Page:
notables only........ You aren't the only ones good at games
Suppose that's another idea, i was thinking more along the lines of console games, and gba games, maybe a mass multiplay, game online, but then thats a little restrictive
Yeah, sounds cool.
Now the biggest problem.
A simple, free, enjoyable, multiplayer game. That is low spec.. Pentium 75mhz, or something along those lines, 133mhz etc.
If you can do that, then get a torny sorted.
Now the biggest problem.
A simple, free, enjoyable, multiplayer game. That is low spec.. Pentium 75mhz, or something along those lines, 133mhz etc.
If you can do that, then get a torny sorted.
Mr.Snuggly wrote:
> Great, we'll drive up and down the country picking up the Notables, then get our
> @sses whupped, then have to give them a prize. Unless we play Pro Evo Soccer,
> in which case, the Notables must give us prizes.
*imagines*
Tony and Ali and Joe Vs er-no.
I win.
> Great, we'll drive up and down the country picking up the Notables, then get our
> @sses whupped, then have to give them a prize. Unless we play Pro Evo Soccer,
> in which case, the Notables must give us prizes.
*imagines*
Tony and Ali and Joe Vs er-no.
I win.
Prodigy wrote:
> Then your initial statement is utterly misleading, anyone can claim a number of
> wins over a period of time, that just normal multiplayer!
But if you used common sense, you would know that nobody could be so silly as to boast over beating 15 computer-handled characters. Let's drop this silly little argument, as it's straying from the original topic, Ok?
> Then your initial statement is utterly misleading, anyone can claim a number of
> wins over a period of time, that just normal multiplayer!
But if you used common sense, you would know that nobody could be so silly as to boast over beating 15 computer-handled characters. Let's drop this silly little argument, as it's straying from the original topic, Ok?
Then your initial statement is utterly misleading, anyone can claim a number of wins over a period of time, that just normal multiplayer!
Prodigy wrote:
> Well then be more clear! Although your prob just lying!
Ok, I can be more clear. I am not lying. 15 goes against human players one after the other must be boring you friends prob just let your win,
> because of boredom
This is spread over a period of time, because I only see my cousins every so often. I could still beat any of you (probably Ant too) at SD1 and 2, but not 3, as I sadly don't own a PS2 nor ever played the game.
> Well then be more clear! Although your prob just lying!
Ok, I can be more clear. I am not lying. 15 goes against human players one after the other must be boring you friends prob just let your win,
> because of boredom
This is spread over a period of time, because I only see my cousins every so often. I could still beat any of you (probably Ant too) at SD1 and 2, but not 3, as I sadly don't own a PS2 nor ever played the game.
Well then be more clear! Although your prob just lying! 15 goes against human players one after the other must be boring you friends prob just let your win, because of boredom
Prodigy wrote:
> Sh@neo wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> Heh, I'd probably lose most of them but I
> can beat anyone at
> any three of the
> Smackdown games, and I'm also a
> master of Red Faction
> multiplayer now too.
Bah, you can't beat me at
> Smackdown 1 or 2, for I am the
> master. With Tazz, I am unbeatable. Out of
> about 15 matches, I have never lost
> one as Tazz. I bet you can kick my bum
> on SD3 though :p
Smackdwon one and two Were both VERY VERY easy, so that's
> not really anything to be proud of! :-P
No, I meant 15 matches against human players! Silly boy! :p
> Sh@neo wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> Heh, I'd probably lose most of them but I
> can beat anyone at
> any three of the
> Smackdown games, and I'm also a
> master of Red Faction
> multiplayer now too.
Bah, you can't beat me at
> Smackdown 1 or 2, for I am the
> master. With Tazz, I am unbeatable. Out of
> about 15 matches, I have never lost
> one as Tazz. I bet you can kick my bum
> on SD3 though :p
Smackdwon one and two Were both VERY VERY easy, so that's
> not really anything to be proud of! :-P
No, I meant 15 matches against human players! Silly boy! :p
Sh@neo wrote:
> Ant wrote:
> Heh, I'd probably lose most of them but I can beat anyone at
> any three of the
> Smackdown games, and I'm also a master of Red Faction
> multiplayer now too.
Bah, you can't beat me at Smackdown 1 or 2, for I am the
> master. With Tazz, I am unbeatable. Out of about 15 matches, I have never lost
> one as Tazz. I bet you can kick my bum on SD3 though :p
Smackdwon one and two Were both VERY VERY easy, so that's not really anything to be proud of! :-P
> Ant wrote:
> Heh, I'd probably lose most of them but I can beat anyone at
> any three of the
> Smackdown games, and I'm also a master of Red Faction
> multiplayer now too.
Bah, you can't beat me at Smackdown 1 or 2, for I am the
> master. With Tazz, I am unbeatable. Out of about 15 matches, I have never lost
> one as Tazz. I bet you can kick my bum on SD3 though :p
Smackdwon one and two Were both VERY VERY easy, so that's not really anything to be proud of! :-P
Page: