The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Final Fantasy X (PS2) 6/10
Super Mario Advance 2 (GBA) 8/10
Medal of Honour: Allied Assault (PC) 7/10
Frequency (PS2) 8/10
Maximo (PS2) 7/10
Wipeout Fusion (PS2) 5/10
MotoGP2 (PS2) 6/10
Azurik: Rise of Perathia (XBox) 3/10
Vampire Night (PS2) 5/10
Tekken Advance (GBA) 7/10
Sonic Advance (GBA) 7/10
Kabuki Warriors (XBox) 1/10
Ginger's point about renting is a good one though. After all, no two people like the same games. Unless there is a sinister government cloning conspiracy going on that I don't know about ;-).
I can't honestly sit here and say I play it all that much. It bores me to death.
Most people won't like the slow pace of final fantasy games, people either seem to lvoe em or hate em, as for wipeout fusion, u could see from the demo's its not much more that wipeout 3 with better graphics, and the edge reviewers are prob getting sick of similar ps2 updates using more or less the same game but with improved graphics.
Its good to see that they are giving the gameboy advance a fair go, the games on that system i have found quite impressive, especially Tekken for anyone who hasn't seen it you will be very surprised by the quality of graphics.
Maximo should of prob of got a lower score, but then again i suppose it might have good pick up and play value.
The Xbox reviews are also superb, as they have used this issue to show how poor some of the xbox games are, which is a good idea as they have given recent other xbox games high scores (such as HALo)
Good topic by the way!
> SONICRAV wrote:
>
BEFORE people rant about these scores (some newbies
> will do any second), let me remind yo how EDGE's scoring works.
Why should a
> newbie rant about these scores? Everyone who posts on this site was a newbie
> originally. Those sort of comments will just put new posters off.
i wasn't...
I predate the "rating" system... and the staff... and the notables... check out my stats ;)
But fair comment about the newbies.. I should have replaced the words with "idiot"... after all, there are some regulars like that..
Sonic
BEFORE people rant about these scores (some newbies will do any second), let me remind yo how EDGE's scoring works.
5/10 is an average game. In theory, exaclty half of games released should be above this score, and half below...
> which is how edge judges it. 5/10 does not mean the game is at all bad... just that it's a rehash of old ideas, adding nothing new to the genre. Nothing
> particuarly bad, nothing particuarly new.
And then 10/10 is an almost unheard of score, meaning that you have gaming perfection- games that push all the
> boundries- sight, sound, plot, gameplay. Only a handful of games have ever done this: Halo, Zelda OOT, Mario, Goldeneye, and rightly so. If you give 90% to
> every games (NOM!), then the score becomes meaningless.
Sonic
---------
Exactly.
They only gave MGS2 8/10 but who cares? I know that it looks amazing, & having recently played the demo for the first time, i think it deserves a 10 just for that.
I'll still get FFX no matter what Edge say, because they always find tiny faults with every game.
Aswell as giving every X-Box launch game higher than 88%!