The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
http://special.reserve.co.uk/ reviews/review.php?custid=991151459
http://special.reserve.co.uk/ reviews/review.php?custid=991151459&offset=5
When Shaneo found RBS 'copied' review earlier, it's easy to see how he found it. He was copying Chris' himself, from one page before!! Now, this is an all time low.
Take a look at Monkey of Wars and RastaBillySkanks reviews, remarkably similar.
http://special.reserve.co.uk/ reviews/review.php?custid=991151459&offset=5
When Shaneo found RBS 'copied' review earlier, it's easy to see how he found it. He was copying Chris' himself, from one page before!! Now, this is an all time low.
Take a look at Monkey of Wars and RastaBillySkanks reviews, remarkably similar.
Page:
Sh@neo wrote:
> Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Sh@neo wrote:
That firstly, editing a review is fine
> and
> not a copying
> offence,
Of course it is you prat, you're
> supposed to write the review
> yourself giving your own views, you're not
> supposed to take someone else's
> review change a few words round and add a
> bit of text.
Technically, editing is still "legal", as it's
> different to copying. Ah well, I'm off, I can't be bothered with you all.
Leaving, for good?
> Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Sh@neo wrote:
That firstly, editing a review is fine
> and
> not a copying
> offence,
Of course it is you prat, you're
> supposed to write the review
> yourself giving your own views, you're not
> supposed to take someone else's
> review change a few words round and add a
> bit of text.
Technically, editing is still "legal", as it's
> different to copying. Ah well, I'm off, I can't be bothered with you all.
Leaving, for good?
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Sh@neo wrote:
That firstly, editing a review is fine and
> not a copying
> offence,
Of course it is you prat, you're supposed to write the review
> yourself giving your own views, you're not supposed to take someone else's
> review change a few words round and add a bit of text.
Technically, editing is still "legal", as it's different to copying. Ah well, I'm off, I can't be bothered with you all.
> Sh@neo wrote:
That firstly, editing a review is fine and
> not a copying
> offence,
Of course it is you prat, you're supposed to write the review
> yourself giving your own views, you're not supposed to take someone else's
> review change a few words round and add a bit of text.
Technically, editing is still "legal", as it's different to copying. Ah well, I'm off, I can't be bothered with you all.
Surely you should have got RBS' permission before you "edited" his review.
Sh@neo wrote:
That firstly, editing a review is fine and
> not a copying offence,
Of course it is you prat, you're supposed to write the review yourself giving your own views, you're not supposed to take someone else's review change a few words round and add a bit of text.
That firstly, editing a review is fine and
> not a copying offence,
Of course it is you prat, you're supposed to write the review yourself giving your own views, you're not supposed to take someone else's review change a few words round and add a bit of text.
RastaBillySkank wrote:
> Facist? Care to explain that insult?
You, Tom and your little ring of friends will always team up on me, whether I can write a good topic or not, because that's the way you are and you can't ignore the fact that I've done wrong in the past, yet you seem to forget that Tom has indeed copied in the past, and had a Gameaday confiscated for it. Remember that?
> Facist? Care to explain that insult?
You, Tom and your little ring of friends will always team up on me, whether I can write a good topic or not, because that's the way you are and you can't ignore the fact that I've done wrong in the past, yet you seem to forget that Tom has indeed copied in the past, and had a Gameaday confiscated for it. Remember that?
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Facist?
Oh god Shaneo stop dribbling out crap from your mouth, you try to act
> like you know what you're talking about when at the end of the day you're just
> an idiot.
And what you're "dribbling" out ISN'T crap? I know what I'm talking about, because I have a fully-functional brain, unlike some others I know ;)
"What point were you proving exactly?!"
That firstly, editing a review is fine and not a copying offence, and that you can actually make a decent review from another review. If I knew that it wasn't copied, I wouldn't have done it, of course.
> Facist?
Oh god Shaneo stop dribbling out crap from your mouth, you try to act
> like you know what you're talking about when at the end of the day you're just
> an idiot.
And what you're "dribbling" out ISN'T crap? I know what I'm talking about, because I have a fully-functional brain, unlike some others I know ;)
"What point were you proving exactly?!"
That firstly, editing a review is fine and not a copying offence, and that you can actually make a decent review from another review. If I knew that it wasn't copied, I wouldn't have done it, of course.
Facist? Care to explain that insult?
Sh@neo wrote:
I did it as a symbolic statement to prove a
> point!
What point were you proving exactly?!
I did it as a symbolic statement to prove a
> point!
What point were you proving exactly?!
Facist?
Oh god Shaneo stop dribbling out crap from your mouth, you try to act like you know what you're talking about when at the end of the day you're just an idiot.
Oh god Shaneo stop dribbling out crap from your mouth, you try to act like you know what you're talking about when at the end of the day you're just an idiot.
RastaBillySkank wrote:
> Sh@neo wrote:
> Do you think I am that stupid Tom? I did it as a symbolic
> statement to prove a
> point!
You WARRIOR!
Idiot...
Fascist...
> Sh@neo wrote:
> Do you think I am that stupid Tom? I did it as a symbolic
> statement to prove a
> point!
You WARRIOR!
Idiot...
Fascist...
Page: