The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'StarFox 64'.
Some people who have Starfox on the gamecube say its rubbish because they cannot do the hard parts of the game i think its sad but what do you think.
Page:
*walks out of topic in search of Unbeliever the non spamming n00b.
go talk to unbeliever
param wrote:
> come on people talk to me
No you spammer.
> come on people talk to me
No you spammer.
come on people talk to me
Enemy of the state wrote:
> It made more sense once I realised my mistake and then tried to
> correct it.
>
> I think I once read that from all the posts on the forums every day
> there is a shortlist made by the poor staff member who has to read
> through every post. Then Snuggly makes the decision on who to award
> the GAD to.
> I figure the same system might be used for the reviews as well.
you have done well you have corrected your mistake and explained to me about game a day
> It made more sense once I realised my mistake and then tried to
> correct it.
>
> I think I once read that from all the posts on the forums every day
> there is a shortlist made by the poor staff member who has to read
> through every post. Then Snuggly makes the decision on who to award
> the GAD to.
> I figure the same system might be used for the reviews as well.
you have done well you have corrected your mistake and explained to me about game a day
It made more sense once I realised my mistake and then tried to correct it.
I think I once read that from all the posts on the forums every day there is a shortlist made by the poor staff member who has to read through every post. Then Snuggly makes the decision on who to award the GAD to.
I figure the same system might be used for the reviews as well.
I think I once read that from all the posts on the forums every day there is a shortlist made by the poor staff member who has to read through every post. Then Snuggly makes the decision on who to award the GAD to.
I figure the same system might be used for the reviews as well.
Enemy of the state wrote:
> param wrote:
> i was wrong his starfox one did win but i want to know how did it
> win
> it was rubbish
>
> I don't claim to know how Snuggly decides which review to pick to win,
> If I did I'd write some reviews.
> But In snugglys opinion it was the best review that was written on
> that day.
>
> Now I know how I managed to mess up earlier...
> I didn't read the bit "read my review" at the end of Sib's
> post and thought you were refering to his post and not as it turned
> out, his review.
do you know now what i meant and is it really snuggly that chooses the winners
> param wrote:
> i was wrong his starfox one did win but i want to know how did it
> win
> it was rubbish
>
> I don't claim to know how Snuggly decides which review to pick to win,
> If I did I'd write some reviews.
> But In snugglys opinion it was the best review that was written on
> that day.
>
> Now I know how I managed to mess up earlier...
> I didn't read the bit "read my review" at the end of Sib's
> post and thought you were refering to his post and not as it turned
> out, his review.
do you know now what i meant and is it really snuggly that chooses the winners
param wrote:
> i was wrong his starfox one did win but i want to know how did it win
> it was rubbish
I don't claim to know how Snuggly decides which review to pick to win, If I did I'd write some reviews.
But In snugglys opinion it was the best review that was written on that day.
Now I know how I managed to mess up earlier...
I didn't read the bit "read my review" at the end of Sib's post and thought you were refering to his post and not as it turned out, his review.
> i was wrong his starfox one did win but i want to know how did it win
> it was rubbish
I don't claim to know how Snuggly decides which review to pick to win, If I did I'd write some reviews.
But In snugglys opinion it was the best review that was written on that day.
Now I know how I managed to mess up earlier...
I didn't read the bit "read my review" at the end of Sib's post and thought you were refering to his post and not as it turned out, his review.
param wrote:
> Enemy of the state wrote:
> I didn't check the gameaday lists until after I wrote the first
> post.
> ... not in any hope of finding my name up there, but to see what
> won.
> then I noticed that sibs had written a review.
>
> but how do you know the starfox one won it could have been one of his
> other reviews
i was wrong his starfox one did win but i want to know how did it win it was rubbish
> Enemy of the state wrote:
> I didn't check the gameaday lists until after I wrote the first
> post.
> ... not in any hope of finding my name up there, but to see what
> won.
> then I noticed that sibs had written a review.
>
> but how do you know the starfox one won it could have been one of his
> other reviews
i was wrong his starfox one did win but i want to know how did it win it was rubbish
Enemy of the state wrote:
> I didn't check the gameaday lists until after I wrote the first
> post.
> ... not in any hope of finding my name up there, but to see what
> won.
> then I noticed that sibs had written a review.
but how do you know the starfox one won it could have been one of his other reviews
> I didn't check the gameaday lists until after I wrote the first
> post.
> ... not in any hope of finding my name up there, but to see what
> won.
> then I noticed that sibs had written a review.
but how do you know the starfox one won it could have been one of his other reviews
Page: