The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Purely because the main market for HarryPotter merchandise is around 13 or below, yet for LotR it (I would have hoped) would be higher.
So perhaps the LotR game may be more sophisticated?
To clarify things, this is not Iguana commenting on anything games related.
Think of what they could have done with the licence: a virtual world online where you go through the school ofline and when passed and learnt the spells do battle through forests and unchanted lands. They could have made a brilliant RPG but instead they make a cheap cash in for all the 8 year olds. even they complete it whithin 4 days. HP was a complete waste of time: how could PCgamer give it 79%? It isn't even a game!
> Or the book, the book dammit.
*Jumps around waving her "It was a book
> first" flag"
heh, my thoughts exactly upon reading the title of this thread.
*reads grapo2001's blatant cover up post*
Yeah, probably true. I suspect more of the gamesplaying public have seen the film than read the book. Good point you made there.
*Jumps around waving her "It was a book first" flag"