The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Its either a whole package and not 100+ quid on one thing.
> its not that bad the mx....
> but a geforce 4 ti any of them is good of course a 4400 or 4600 would
> play it on 32bit and high texture quality easily..
Yeah, the MX is alright for a budget card, but apart from a slight increase in detail, I didn't really see much difference from my old GeForce 2.
Could be because their both PCI card, I don't know, either way I'll be looking to get one of the bigger cards in a few months time, because finally I've got a computer which supports AGP slot.
> yea i seen that.... gts is about twice or more powerful than the
> mx400....
nevermind i sawa something similar had the gts in there.....
without out going indepth the mx card has less features for each chipset it uses compared to a similar bandwidth in similar type of gpu
eg gf2 gts 32ddr will beat gf2 mx440
gf4 ti4200 64 will beat gf4 mx460 etc
but it isnt that simple either as clock speeds and benchmark tests vary and benchmark tests in particular assine more value to a card that has extra features but not more bandwidth
eek
for a simplified look at test performances try looking at a good reliable independant tester
ive posted this guys site many times but it is in my opinion the best and most complete site
http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/20021218 /vgacharts-05.html
take out space after the 8(link to long) spam protection
and he is independant which is a great bonus