The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
FOG Chat is now a dump.
What's happened recently...?
Kyz22 has discovered Michael Jackson, depsite the fact that that was a week ago and no-one really cares.
Lovely Lolly has had over 100 replies to two pointless topics.
have fun, chumps.
What's happened recently...?
Kyz22 has discovered Michael Jackson, depsite the fact that that was a week ago and no-one really cares.
Lovely Lolly has had over 100 replies to two pointless topics.
have fun, chumps.
Page:
I agree, just skim through the posts and read the decent ones and let the rubbish sink to the bottom.
All this argueing over some SPAM.
You see, there is too much of it now, so just ignore the 'rubbish' posts. If you see a crap post, dont reply by saying, 'this is a crap post'. When one person replies like that, everyone starts doing it, and arguements start, then 'some' noobs just keep posting SPAM because they know they can get an arguement started.
So its best to ignore those kind of posts completely, if they are so bad, then the SR staffies delete them, simple as.
You see, there is too much of it now, so just ignore the 'rubbish' posts. If you see a crap post, dont reply by saying, 'this is a crap post'. When one person replies like that, everyone starts doing it, and arguements start, then 'some' noobs just keep posting SPAM because they know they can get an arguement started.
So its best to ignore those kind of posts completely, if they are so bad, then the SR staffies delete them, simple as.
oh i see, sorry J-42
*stamps topic with 'SPAM' badge*
*stamps topic with 'SPAM' badge*
Well at least we have topics like this to keep the quality up? Eh?
*COUGH*
*COUGH*
Starlight wrote:
> mikelar wrote:
> no he didn't J-42.
>
> Whitestripes said they place is cack, Starlight said what to do
> about
> it.
>
> Yep, I reckon there's a ratio of 1 moaning topic to every 5
> "crap" topics.
>
> And it's all "spam"
I agree with you i was refering to Azul. (Look below)
Anyway, although the posts are spam, they are fun, which is what i am ehre for.
> mikelar wrote:
> no he didn't J-42.
>
> Whitestripes said they place is cack, Starlight said what to do
> about
> it.
>
> Yep, I reckon there's a ratio of 1 moaning topic to every 5
> "crap" topics.
>
> And it's all "spam"
I agree with you i was refering to Azul. (Look below)
Anyway, although the posts are spam, they are fun, which is what i am ehre for.
mikelar wrote:
> no he didn't J-42.
>
> Whitestripes said they place is cack, Starlight said what to do about
> it.
I was refering to Azul.
> no he didn't J-42.
>
> Whitestripes said they place is cack, Starlight said what to do about
> it.
I was refering to Azul.
Yes, I agree with Starlight. Also, by making topics about it, you're just adding to the problem.
mikelar wrote:
> no he didn't J-42.
>
> Whitestripes said they place is cack, Starlight said what to do about
> it.
Yep, I reckon there's a ratio of 1 moaning topic to every 5 "crap" topics.
And it's all "spam"
> no he didn't J-42.
>
> Whitestripes said they place is cack, Starlight said what to do about
> it.
Yep, I reckon there's a ratio of 1 moaning topic to every 5 "crap" topics.
And it's all "spam"
and i agree totally with Starlight.
Don't start crying because the place isn't like you want it to be. The same thing happened in The Life forum. Someone posted some **** about there beings lots of rubbish topics in there. If thats the case, just don't read/reply to the "rubbish" topics.
Don't start crying because the place isn't like you want it to be. The same thing happened in The Life forum. Someone posted some **** about there beings lots of rubbish topics in there. If thats the case, just don't read/reply to the "rubbish" topics.
Who me? I don't think so.
Page: