The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Well they are.
This forum used to contain soe fairly decent posts about decent games around, feedback on games or general chat about games, the people on here etc etc etc
Maybe it is just me but there have been loads and loads of pointless threads asking people to post nonsense in here, chat about something stupid or mostly just utter spam with no point at all.
Do Newbies think that the more replies the more chance you have to win?
Are people that bored or un-original to come up with something decent to post about.
Or is this really the intelligence level of this forum which seems to be driving most folk away??
This forum used to contain soe fairly decent posts about decent games around, feedback on games or general chat about games, the people on here etc etc etc
Maybe it is just me but there have been loads and loads of pointless threads asking people to post nonsense in here, chat about something stupid or mostly just utter spam with no point at all.
Do Newbies think that the more replies the more chance you have to win?
Are people that bored or un-original to come up with something decent to post about.
Or is this really the intelligence level of this forum which seems to be driving most folk away??
Page:
*cough* Gary Glitter *cough*
There are many potential jokes about this one; but I fear I will taint the minds of many children across the UK if I say them...
My point stands.
Insane Bartender wrote:
> Old men fancy 16 year old girls.
Most men fancy 16 year old girls though...
> Old men fancy 16 year old girls.
Most men fancy 16 year old girls though...
Old men fancy 16 year old girls.
Do you think that old men fancy old women? And vice versa?
Goatboy wrote:
> You never know, we'll be moon-living by then so no worries. Although
> the notion of zero-gravity nekkid old ladies is worrying
GAH!
*scratches at eyes*
> You never know, we'll be moon-living by then so no worries. Although
> the notion of zero-gravity nekkid old ladies is worrying
GAH!
*scratches at eyes*
Goatboy wrote:
> You never know, we'll be moon-living by then so no worries. Although
> the notion of zero-gravity nekkid old ladies is worrying
*tries to shake horrifying image out of head but fails*
eugh.
> You never know, we'll be moon-living by then so no worries. Although
> the notion of zero-gravity nekkid old ladies is worrying
*tries to shake horrifying image out of head but fails*
eugh.
*squints at the monitor*
Oh, tuck.
You never know, we'll be moon-living by then so no worries. Although the notion of zero-gravity nekkid old ladies is worrying
Oh, tuck.
You never know, we'll be moon-living by then so no worries. Although the notion of zero-gravity nekkid old ladies is worrying
Goatboy wrote:
> Big is good as long as they are not like socks with snooker balls in
> the bottom.
*belly laugh*
I'm too young for that, but I do forsee it in my future.
Maybe I'll be rich enough for a tuck by then.
> Big is good as long as they are not like socks with snooker balls in
> the bottom.
*belly laugh*
I'm too young for that, but I do forsee it in my future.
Maybe I'll be rich enough for a tuck by then.
Page: