The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Ahem... anyhoo, glad to see BEARDS. isn't a conformist... or something.
Anyhoo, gettin' mesel' a new MP3 player soon, maybe that £300 one here at SR (with the 20 gig of space, even though all the MP3s I own in the world only take up 5 gig)
And BEARDS., I used to waffle on about older games in my reviews, but only to set the mood, and let them know how it's improved. Don't have time for reviews nowadays... (hmm, might go do some, been a while since I let my creative side run wild)
> ban him for fun
LOL.
Parr wrote:
> That is hillarious. That review should get an award. Send him a wet
> tea bag!!
LOL!!!!!!
> Myst, I meant on the Edge forum, where everyone likes Justin because
> the admin does.
That is why i don't go on the EDGE forums...
> "All RTS Fans - or at least most, would have begun their
> obsession with the daddy of all the RTS's to come. Age of empires
> itself came out around 1995"
>
> The above comment is a crime against gaming. Let us all bow our heads
> in shame.
Yep, I began with C & C :)
> "ok basicly this game sux the graphics are ok but does that mean
> i have to rate it a 10? NO! the game is horrible my opinion is that u
> should by it on the pc....MUCH BETTER AFTER ALL AM I NOT USING A PC?
> AM I USUNG THE ****ING GAME TO TYPE TO YOU??? NO!!!!!!!! DONT BY THIS
> GAME IT IS THE WORS THING I HAVE EVER PLAYED RIGHT ALONG NEXT TO THAT
> GAY ANIMAL CROSSING!!! IT SUX!!!!"
Genius.
> Or a trout, with instructions to slap himself repeatedly with it :P
lol, that's a cracker.
:)