The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Number 1: People who start reviews by talking about the game's predecessor(s) which they clearly never played.
Page:
BEARDS. wrote:
> It wasn't bad.
I read it. It was bad - I was testing you to see if you lie...
> It wasn't bad.
I read it. It was bad - I was testing you to see if you lie...
BEARDS., any chance of a mass banning of all the people making stupid spam posts in chat lately?
Any other annoying things today BEARDS?
Well when I am going to write a review of Golden Sun 2: The lost Age you should already know that I own and have played the first game over 5 times, so you will get an honest and truthful opinion on the game's predessor and the new game, which I will get on the 14th of April 2003 instead of the July/August european release date.
I normally start off with something like that, but I have normally played the other games :-D
Anyway, what are doing at work on Sunday?
Anyway, what are doing at work on Sunday?
BEARDS when is the noptable election. the real one not that fony type that people said
Beards, are you doing today's GAD or yesterday's?
idlewild wrote:
> Things annoying me - Beards not telling me what he thought of my
> monster post.
It wasn't bad.
> Things annoying me - Beards not telling me what he thought of my
> monster post.
It wasn't bad.
I have nothing against them mentioning the first game, it's just the ones who talk about how they "enjoyed the graphical realism on the original" when I remember its graphics were slated on release as being 3 years out of date.
Things annoying me - Beards not telling me what he thought of my monster post.
Page: